Firearms Talk banner

Ruger 10/22 takedown or not?

8K views 51 replies 23 participants last post by  kfox75  
#1 ·
Hey, im about to buy a Ruger 10/22, im not sure if I should get the takedown model or the other "whole" model. The takedown model costs around 120$ more here and obviously two advantages is that you can take it apart for easier cleaning and carrying.

But my question is how do they differ when it comes to after market parts? Im definitely gonna buy a new stock, do both takedown and the other model "whole" model fit in all the same stocks?


Thanks.
 
#2 · (Edited)
personally, I wouldn't buy the take-down version unless I had a need for that particular version, such as a backpack type gun or something along those lines. not worth the difference in price to me. my suggestion is why spend the extra, unless you have a particular need for the take-down model.

some parts will interchange between the two versions, but some are going to be specific to that particular model.

I know Boyd's makes specific stocks for the take-down models and they are different stocks than the regular 10/22's. if I had to guess, no they probably won't fit either stock, and are specific to each model.
 
#3 · (Edited)
Okey thanks for reply.

It feels like mosts stock would fit the "not take apart" model? Like ATI strike force?

Are BX-25 the best 25 rounders or what magazines should I go for?


Edit;

Do you recommend buying any other items for the rifle? Cuz il have to wait some time for the delivery. Any good spareparts or something?
 
#4 ·
Okey thanks for reply.

It feels like mosts stock would fit the "not take apart" model? Like ATI strike force?

Are BX-25 the best 25 rounders or what magazines should I go for?


Edit;

Do you recommend buying any other items for the rifle? Cuz il have to wait some time for the delivery. Any good spareparts or something?
personally, I like the more traditional look in my rifles, so I have no knowledge of the ATI Strikeforce stock.

some people give the BX-25 magazines great reviews and some seem to have some feed issues with them. personally, I like and have always used the factory Ruger magazines when I owned a 10/22.

one area I would look to improve upon that in my opinion is one of the major faults of the rifle is the trigger assembly. unless they have improved the factory triggers over those in the past, this is where I would start.
 
#5 ·
you can put the takedown into a compact case, that does not look like a rifle case which would give sensitive sisters of both birth genders the fainting vapors and the hissy fits.

you can put the takedown into a compact place, which would not be a place for a full length rifle. if you drive a beyond compact car like a Baja bug, Samurai or MGB this is a necessary consideration.

you can store the takedown into a compact space, which would not be a space for a full length rifle. reducing the chance of a burglar finding it.
 
#11 ·
I have the take down, like others have said it depends. Looking back I probably would use the extra money it costs for ammo. Its a great gun but the takedown feature isn't that practical.
I would stick with Ruger mags.
Oh, I disagree. Maybe it's not practical for YOU, but I am

very happy with the whole package, and the little difference

in cost, between the standard 10-22, and the takedown, is

negligible, when you spread it over the time you will own the

rifle.

To say the barrel isn't easier to clean begs disbelief. You take down

rifle, and the chamber is right there, with no obstructions.

The ballistic nylon case is solid, padded, and well built, with plenty

of extra room. It is as accurate as the standard 10-22, also.
 
#12 ·
Regarding mags, stick with Ruger. Have 4 BX & never had a problem. Also check out the tri-mag. Small device which locks 3 rotary mags together. Small, easy to carry & provides 30 rounds. Also love my extended mag release for quick mag changes. All upgrades I'd do again in a heartbeat.
 
#13 ·
Regarding mags, stick with Ruger. Have 4 BX & never had a problem. Also check out the tri-mag. Small device which locks 3 rotary mags together. Small, easy to carry & provides 30 rounds. Also love my extended mag release for quick mag changes. All upgrades I'd do again in a heartbeat.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
THIS is so true. Ruger brand mags have the metal feed lips

which disreputable ripoff companies don't. The only thing worse that

crap-o mags, like Butler Creek, is when you send them back to the

manufacturer, as I did, and they keep the mags,(I guess to dupe

somebody else.) and never even acknowledge your letter or package.
 
#15 · (Edited)
A thought on the difference. I own both, the problem I have with the takedown, is the sights are located on the receiver, and it is impossible for them to be accurately realigned when you mount and dismount the barrel. My target 10-22 has an aftermarket barrel with the Volquartsen cantilever scope mount, so the scope and barrel stay in alignment.

Now the takedown is an accurate rifle for plinking but, it isn't a target class rifle. Volquartsen has a light weight barrel for the take down with their cantilever mount, that is on my wish list for spring.
 
#16 ·
A thought on the difference. I own both, the problem I have with the takedown, is the sights are located on the receiver, and it is impossible for them to be accurately realigned when you mount and dismount the barrel. My target 10-22 has an aftermarket barrel with the Volquartsen cantilever scope mount, so the scope and barrel stay in alignment.

Now the takedown is an accurate rifle for plinking but, it isn't a target class rifle. Volquartsen has a light weight barrel for the take down with their cantilever mount, that is on my wish list for spring.
So when detaching/ reattaching the barrel it is no longer sighted in and needs resighted? I've heard that isn't a problem with the takedown.
 
#18 ·
Well what are you using it for? And I like the the 10/22 Magpul edition (X-22 stock) with stainless beautiful, or the mannlicher* stock with scale type checkering or stainless laminate. But how many times are you really gonna use the takedown feature after the what I call the 'feature play' in other words you use it 6-7 times and dont give crap anymore about it, example sig 522 I used the foldable stock 2 times, the bolt hold open and release when I remember. Over all my pick is not gonna be the take down, so there is my opinion is it worth any thing nope go with you needs and applications that can be filled. Good luck and keep shootn
 
#20 ·
One vote for the standard issue 10/22, only because that's what I have. Stick with Ruger mags. I've had trouble with after market mags, for both my 10/22 and Mini-14. A word of caution. Get your mags now, while the prices are down. During "The Panic" a few years ago, prices tripled, IF you could find them. Hate to say it, but sooner or later, there will be another panic.
 
#21 ·
My little 10/22.... Mannlicher stock... camo... totally accurate... unless you have a specific need for a take down.... I wouldn't consider it... of course that is my opinion.... which of course... we all have one... :pot stirrer:
 

Attachments

#22 ·
My little 10/22.... Mannlicher stock... camo... totally accurate... unless you have a specific need for a take down.... I wouldn't consider it... of course that is my opinion.... which of course... we all have one... :pot stirrer:
She's a looker Speezack.

i say go for a Marlin model 70P or 70PSS if you are looking for a take down. The sights are on the barrel, and Hi Cap mags are out there for it, and you can get the older one (70P) for less than $200 if you watch the used racks. Then again, what are you buying it for?

I currently have a 70P that was a project build (Johhny Cashed it over the last 5 years from a stock and receiver I picked up for 15 bucks at a gun show.), a 10\22 takedown and CRR, and a few AR7s, including the pistol made by Charter Arms, and they do have a purpose. that purpose is not as a precision rifle. They are a stop gap camp or survival rifle that is also good for plinking, and that's honestly about it. i use mine as a backpack gun or truck gun while out in the sticks to gather up dinner if I am going to be out overnight during hunting season, or as a means of popping a couple rabbits or squirrels when the deer ain't moving much, and i just don't feel the need to go home. I'm not saying they are inaccurate, but when it comes to the point that you have dropped $500 into a $350 rifle, you might as well have just spent the $1,000 on a Volquartsen instead.Now, the upsides to the 70P\PSS and the AR&.

Both will float, Marlin in it's case, AR7 in it's stock. The Ruger does not.

The Marlin sights are on the barrel, and if you want a peep sight on the rear, one is available, and using it is a simple as folding down the rear notch on the barrel. My 10\22 takedoen also has them on the barrel, and the same rear sight option is out there for it as well. The AR7 is only available with the receiver mounted peep sight.

All the parts to the AR7 will fit in it's own stock, including 2 mags and one more in the stock with the Henry US Survival Rifle. It will not fit with the scope on it.

The AR7 and the Marlin are more compact when taken down (The AR7 stock is only 16.5 inches on the longest part, the stock, and the thin case for the Marlin is only 24 inches long.), and cost less than the standard 10\22, and the take down model.

Both are lighter than the 10\22.

Both also have no fore end, which takes some getting use to, but it does save weight, and is truly a free float barrel. This also makes it easier, should you live in an NFA friendly state, to Form 1 or Form 4 it, buy another barrel, and SBR or Suppress it, and you still have the standard barrel so you don't need to leave it home if your travels take you to an NFA restricted state. granted, you can also just thread the barrel of a standard model, but even that's a no go in some states, and you are adding length to the rifle, where the other way lets you run a shorter barrel with a can, or just integrally syppress the rifle, keeping it the same length.

now the 10\22 has more aftermarket support than the other 2, and more goodies are made for it. you can also put together a 3 day kit, if you keep it down to just what you need, in the Ruger case\pack. Ruger also has their own mags for longer shooting time at the range, the BX Series in 15, 25, and 25 X 2. That's honestly about it.

now, the why portion for my having them, I like the take down concept, and there is just something kind of cool knowing you can fit a rifle and 2,000 rounds of ammo in a back, and only you know it's there. less than 3 pounds for the rifle and 100 rounds of ammo is nothing to carry with you when camping or hunting, and if the action is good on the small game end, I can sling the big rifle or shotgun, and use the little one to go after that daily limit instead. Or, if I Get a large,aggressive fish, i can use the .22 to pop it before bringing it into the boat (Came in handy when i was on Vacation in LA, and we caught a 3.5 foot Alligator Gar. My buddy the wife and i were with used it to do just that before we pulled it in.) All of my AR7s fit in the 15 inch long saddle bags on my bike, and the Marlin fits in my sissy bar bag, and no one knows it's there.

Take downs do have a use, and they are fun to own, but they are not fully practical either. They are nice for survival gear in a boat or small aircraft, and under the seat of the truck. That and the fun factor when folks see them is why I own them. The only major let down for me is, I rarely get to enjoy them myself, as my friends and family want to shoot them as well when i set one of them up at the range.

in the end it's your money, do with it what you will. I just wanted to advise you on the other options that exist so you can check on them as well before parting with your money.
 
#23 ·
Well not to whiz on your parade, kfox75, but the AR7 shoots

like crap, and has serious dependability issues.

Whereas the 10/22 takedown is as accurate as the

standard 10/22, and also as dependable.

I did a lot of side by side comparison with the AR7,

before deciding to go with the 10/22 takedown, and

the AR7, to be kind, came up wanting.
 
#24 · (Edited)
I have owned 2 or 3 AR-7s. All had cycling issues. I replaced the last of them with a Springfield M6. I prefer the M6.
I do not agree that the AR-7 "shoots like crap." Mine were plenty accurate. The M6 does not lock up tight and accuracy suffers but reliability is incredible.
 
#26 · (Edited)
If having a takedown Ruger 10/22 speaks to you, Then its a free country, get it.
If anything, if you dont think much of it, Im sure there are folks thatd buy it once your through with it.

Presently my only takedown rifle is a winchester pump clone mfg by Taurus a stainless steel model 73 carbine (.22Mag), though a take down, I dont utilize that feature for transport or storage.
For a while also had a Marlin 39 that also had a take down feature that aided cleaning, but never broke it down for travel.

Many years ago I had a pair of Charter Arms AR-7's that spent most their time assembled though the big selling point was they could stow in the butt stock.
 

Attachments