Wyoming Sheriffs Told Federal BATF & IRS Agents To Abide By The Constitution Or Face

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by chevelle427, Sep 24, 2011.

  1. chevelle427

    chevelle427 New Member

    45
    0
    0
  2. Scratchammo

    Scratchammo New Member

    1,490
    0
    0
    That's the stuff I like to hear
     

  3. chevelle427

    chevelle427 New Member

    45
    0
    0
    looks like some are growing there Back Bone back;)
     
  4. Scratchammo

    Scratchammo New Member

    1,490
    0
    0
    And not a moment too soon. Nice ride by the way.
     
  5. chevelle427

    chevelle427 New Member

    45
    0
    0
    thanks much had her from back in 1974:D
     
  6. texaswoodworker

    texaswoodworker New Member

    10,198
    0
    0
    Glad to hear that someone is standing up the the BAFT and IRS.
     
  7. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    3,305
    28
    48
    That is out-damn-standing!!!!!!
     
  8. ttolhurst

    ttolhurst New Member

    125
    0
    0
    Sorry, this is a hoax that has been rattling around various crackpot sites for some time. The US District Court of Wyoming has even had to put out a statement regarding the matter.

    As anyone who has ever read the US Constitution should know, no Federal court would ever rule in such a manner. Article VI, Section 2 is pretty clear about Federal supremacy:

     
  9. chevelle427

    chevelle427 New Member

    45
    0
    0
    bummer

    i have heard the Montana gun law,gun is made there sold there atf stay out of it is going to be challenged
     
  10. BigByrd47119

    BigByrd47119 New Member

    3,426
    0
    0
    I say bring back the Republic!
     
  11. Rasica

    Rasica New Member

    1
    0
    0
    Article is fact: crackpots say otherwise. - another such incidence just happened in N

    There is no such clause for supremacy. In fact, There is priority, first is we the people, second are thecStates and last is the fed.

    Article VI – Debts, Supremacy, Oaths:*The Supreme Law of the Land is comprised of the Constitution, Law, and Treaty. The Constitution has supremacy over Law and Treaty, as it is it which constructs our governance, the separation of powers and checks and balances, and the powers and authorities of the People, the States, and the Union, respectively, and every officer of the United States and the several states are bound by Oath to the Constitution.

    The “supremacy clause” is dealt with in Mack/Printz, in which the U.S. Supreme Court stated once and for all, that the only thing “supreme” is the Constitution itself. Where by the powers, the Sheriff reigns supreme above the president.


    In fact another showing that the Sheriff has supremacy over a fed any day of the week.

    Obama’s Federal Stooges Beginning To Understand The Power Of Sheriffs: Sheriff Warns Federal Agents They Will Be Arrested If They Interfere! « Political Vel Craft.
     
  12. ttolhurst

    ttolhurst New Member

    125
    0
    0
    What??? "There is no such clause"???

    Do me a favor: Pick up your favorite copy of the Constitution (here's one, in case you don't have one handy), and find Article VI, Section 2. You will find these words there:

    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. ​

    If your copy doesn't have these words, ask for your money back.
     
  13. lonewolf101

    lonewolf101 New Member

    528
    0
    0
  14. Dennis845

    Dennis845 New Member

    272
    0
    0
    No argument here folks! But, what will 9 black robed politically appointed people decide what is constitutional?

    And mark my words, United Nations law "supersedes" U.S. law and our Constitution, or will in the near future. There will come a day when our U.S. soldiers will be required to wear the U.N. patch on their left shoulder and follow foreign commanders orders, or be court-martialed. Or, be required by the WTO, to purchase X amount of tomatoes from Mexico and x amount of olives from Egypt, etc., etc. Ooops, we're already there! Don't think this is the case and just my opinion?