Why 33 rounds makes sense in a defensive weapon

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by indyfan, Feb 16, 2011.

  1. indyfan

    indyfan New Member

    422
    0
    0
  2. Dillinger

    Dillinger New Member

    23,972
    2
    0
    It's an interesting take on the situation, and one of the more positive and historically accurate ones written.

    I will reserve comment on whether it "makes sense" in a defensive situation for The Bunker.

    JD
     

  3. DarinCraft

    DarinCraft New Member

    1,159
    0
    0
    I agree with his points in reference to self defense in a residential setting, however that capacity in CCW is impractical if not ridiculous. Now I am speaking of capacity not count. A 15 round mag with a spare is one thing, but one 30 mag is once again impractical.
     
  4. indyfan

    indyfan New Member

    422
    0
    0

    Stephen discusses it in the article.


     
  5. JonM

    JonM Moderator

    20,110
    19
    38
    carry a 15 round mag in the gun easier to lug the 30 rounder in a pocket. its vable for ccw.

    my belief is pistol mags beyound 15 are not reliable enough to stake your life on. according to the media print laughner's 33 rounder failed on him. in fact laughner would have killed and injured far far more people if his 33 round mags hadnt failed or he had of been limited to 10 round mags.

    laughners choice of a interweb-mall-ninja gun setup probably saved quite a few people.