Joined
·
48 Posts
Seriously, what's the plan? What do you plan on doing?
What's the plan if Gun Confiscation begins?
- Status
1 - 20 of 62 Posts
I just don't believe there will be a gun confiscation because it is the armed citizens who are actually protecting the inner-core of America from an outside take-over. There may be more control, registration, licensing, and training requirements; but not total disarmament. The People will never permit themselves to be vulnerable to violence and crime.
Joined
·
48 Posts
Well same here, but then they'd just make short work of you, I'm talking about we need to organize. I've already begun doing so in my area. We need a massive organized resistance group. A modern-day Minutemen force.
Joined
·
6,964 Posts
There aren't enough LEOs, Guard and military to do simultaneous house-to-house gun confiscations. Therefore, they would have to start in some places and work their way to other places. Word of this would spread extremely quickly.
Then, I expect the shooting would start and there would be an awful lot of dead Americans - LEOs, Guard and military as well as civilians - in the name of non-violence and safety.
Then, I expect the shooting would start and there would be an awful lot of dead Americans - LEOs, Guard and military as well as civilians - in the name of non-violence and safety.
Joined
·
1,657 Posts
I can see one of the first places they'd try to start is the Peoples' Яepublik of Kalifornia. The pro-gun forces there would be very busy getting the word out to the rest of the country, which would probably start a ground-swell of resistance, which would escalate into a full-blown nationwide protest complete with large rallies against the confiscation efforts. The only places where a full on confiscation might be somewhat successful are those where oppressive gun laws already exist....like Chicago and New York City. As bkt said, once the word gets out, the violence would, most likely, escalate to a full blown "war" involving shooting.
Joined
·
7,509 Posts
Guns, what guns? No guns here, Just my Model 11 floor lamp and featherlight broom handle!
Registration FOOG is just one short step from confiscation, they already have that done with pistols throughout the Union. Those that would order the act are not the same ones that will be required to carry it out. I would guess that very few Americans would apply for that job.
You think Repo guys have a dangerous job, Federal Gun Collectors would meet with some very stiff and painful resistance.
Gun control is just another misnomer for people control. We are way down that slippery slope and any more pacification of the fear-mongers rants will lead to an explosion heard round the world.
Ive said before that lifes not digital; all or nothing, good or bad. Life's analog but our bill of rights is not. It is definable and absolute, only our actions are subjective. Do not give the regulators a single inch of territory that they do not own and do everything in your power to take back what has been stolen from us FOOG.
I cannot agree with a single view that compromises a single clause in our single basis of common cause as Americans, The Constitution. To believe for one moment that restricting access to anything protected by the blood of our countrymen for law abiding citizens will protect us better is ludicrous. They arent restricting killers, they are disarming citizens.
Actions not possibilities are the only activities that require legal redress. Its stupid to convict someone for what they could do yet reasonable to pass judgement on those that have committed one. Define crime- Im not gonna use the dictionary, just my noggin- A criminal act is one that negates, removes or minimizes the rights, freedoms and liberties of another human. Cruel and destructive Acts against Animals and Mother nature are included, legal hunting is not a crime!!!!
We almost all agree unanimously that anyone convicted of perpetrating a crime with the augmentation of a firearm should be punished to the full extent of the law. Why shouldnt someone who does the same without one not get punished to the full extent of the law? Was it the crime or the gun that is being judged? If its the gun, than technically, the gun should pay the price for the crime not the perpetrator! Thats silly, its the crime we punish and shoulda, woulda, coulda really doesnt mean spit, did and done is all that matters.
Registration FOOG is just one short step from confiscation, they already have that done with pistols throughout the Union. Those that would order the act are not the same ones that will be required to carry it out. I would guess that very few Americans would apply for that job.
You think Repo guys have a dangerous job, Federal Gun Collectors would meet with some very stiff and painful resistance.
Gun control is just another misnomer for people control. We are way down that slippery slope and any more pacification of the fear-mongers rants will lead to an explosion heard round the world.
Ive said before that lifes not digital; all or nothing, good or bad. Life's analog but our bill of rights is not. It is definable and absolute, only our actions are subjective. Do not give the regulators a single inch of territory that they do not own and do everything in your power to take back what has been stolen from us FOOG.
I cannot agree with a single view that compromises a single clause in our single basis of common cause as Americans, The Constitution. To believe for one moment that restricting access to anything protected by the blood of our countrymen for law abiding citizens will protect us better is ludicrous. They arent restricting killers, they are disarming citizens.
Actions not possibilities are the only activities that require legal redress. Its stupid to convict someone for what they could do yet reasonable to pass judgement on those that have committed one. Define crime- Im not gonna use the dictionary, just my noggin- A criminal act is one that negates, removes or minimizes the rights, freedoms and liberties of another human. Cruel and destructive Acts against Animals and Mother nature are included, legal hunting is not a crime!!!!
We almost all agree unanimously that anyone convicted of perpetrating a crime with the augmentation of a firearm should be punished to the full extent of the law. Why shouldnt someone who does the same without one not get punished to the full extent of the law? Was it the crime or the gun that is being judged? If its the gun, than technically, the gun should pay the price for the crime not the perpetrator! Thats silly, its the crime we punish and shoulda, woulda, coulda really doesnt mean spit, did and done is all that matters.
Let us know how that works out. Am interested.
Seriously? What's the plan for doing the confiscations? 
Just send a bunch of UN blue helmets door to door in middle America? Just roll down driveway after driveway with big assed dump trucks, just tossing guns and ammo in the back until full? And then? Drive them all to a huge open field and toss them in the worlds biggest wood chipper?
Logistically explain to us, Please, how this could possibly be done without a ridiculous loss of life on both sides.
There is probably more down range, active military hours in our civilian populace than the collective of the UN troops anyways.
Just send a bunch of UN blue helmets door to door in middle America? Just roll down driveway after driveway with big assed dump trucks, just tossing guns and ammo in the back until full? And then? Drive them all to a huge open field and toss them in the worlds biggest wood chipper?
Logistically explain to us, Please, how this could possibly be done without a ridiculous loss of life on both sides.
There is probably more down range, active military hours in our civilian populace than the collective of the UN troops anyways.
Joined
·
2,073 Posts
Not sure how true it is. Someone on another forum said if any state refused to carry out the order to conduct door to door sweep UN peace keepers would carry out the orders. With the help of armored vehicles and armed drones.Dillinger said:Seriously? What's the plan for doing the confiscations?
Just send a bunch of UN blue helmets door to door in middle America? Just roll down driveway after driveway with big assed dump trucks, just tossing guns and ammo in the back until full? And then? Drive them all to a huge open field and toss them in the worlds biggest wood chipper?
Logistically explain to us, Please, how this could possibly be done without a ridiculous loss of life on both sides.
There is probably more down range, active military hours in our civilian populace than the collective of the UN troops anyways.
Rather than ask what their "Plan" is....dedicate yourself to your answer to any such scheme.
What people actually resolve to DO if such a thing was ever undertaken is far more important than decades of what if discussions. Resolve yourself to make the price of attempting gun confiscation overwhelmingly costly....and you answer the question.
What people actually resolve to DO if such a thing was ever undertaken is far more important than decades of what if discussions. Resolve yourself to make the price of attempting gun confiscation overwhelmingly costly....and you answer the question.
They will not go after the "Guns". they will go after the people and their families. They will make firearm possession a felony. People will be arrested and charged with felonies. This will strike fear on most Americans and they will hide them never to be used again or they will turn them in to their Local PD . Family, friends and neighbors will be their eyes and ears and turning in a gun owner will be rewarded.
They will not have to come door to door, most Americans will turn them in or hide them, either way they will not be used ever again.
They will not have to come door to door, most Americans will turn them in or hide them, either way they will not be used ever again.
Joined
·
2,989 Posts
That's G14 classified. Can't wait for threads like this to show up in the Google search.
Joined
·
9,882 Posts
Yep, another the UN is going to take our guns thread.
i love these civil war threads. Numerous of my relatives lost their lives the last time large numbers of Americans revolted against the US government. The duly elected leaders of this country will do whatever it takes to hold this country together. That includes fire bombing the hades out of folks who take part in armed revolt, if need be.
What in hades is wrong with simply voting the scumbags out of office; every damned one of them? One thing is preventing us from voting all the scumbags out: i hear it here all the time; we must continue to vote for the lesser evil. Voting for evil will not get you there.
i'm now selling a full body double layer tinfoil suit complete with noneexistinium head shield.
i love these civil war threads. Numerous of my relatives lost their lives the last time large numbers of Americans revolted against the US government. The duly elected leaders of this country will do whatever it takes to hold this country together. That includes fire bombing the hades out of folks who take part in armed revolt, if need be.
What in hades is wrong with simply voting the scumbags out of office; every damned one of them? One thing is preventing us from voting all the scumbags out: i hear it here all the time; we must continue to vote for the lesser evil. Voting for evil will not get you there.
i'm now selling a full body double layer tinfoil suit complete with noneexistinium head shield.
1 - 20 of 62 Posts
- Status
Join the discussion
Join now to ask and comment!