What ?????

Discussion in 'The Club House' started by photopro, Dec 6, 2009.

  1. photopro

    photopro New Member

    88
    0
    0
    I don't know whether you guys have this in the US but there is a purile third rate program here where they dump a dozen or so failing career has been "celebs" in the Australian jungle. Now for me they should just leave them there and not bother going back. Anyway viewers, blonds I think, phone in and vote them to do "trials" or "tasks" and each few days one of the idiots is voted out, the final one left in the jungle winning say £100,000. Anyway all this pre-amble it because two of the contestants, one a chef killed and ate a rat, this has happened on other similar programs and since they expect them to find the bulk of their own food totally understandable. Big difference this time, the two guys concerned have been charged with cruelty to a rat - EH ?? I kid you not cruelty to a bloody rat !! Some dumb arsed Australian animal rights "officer" has decided they treated the rat badly and they are to be taken to court. Well DERR, it's a rat that's what you do !!!!
    I hope his house becomes infested with them 'cos he'll struggle to re-home them with caring sensitive new owners.

    WTF is the world coming to ??

    photopro
     
  2. MichaelG

    MichaelG New Member

    158
    0
    0
    Better not tell the animal rights guy about science labs then..
     

  3. skullcrusher

    skullcrusher New Member

    10,888
    1
    0
    We have one of the largest piece o' crap animal rights organizations in the world. PETA. Domestic terrorists, really.
     
  4. gorknoids

    gorknoids New Member

    2,396
    0
    0
    I have actually drawn checks from Peta. We had the landscaping contract for the waterfront condos right beside Peta, and charged them $40.00 for driving a mower about 50 yards along the curb. What a friggin freak show those people are.
    How was the chef "cruel" to the rat? Did he mock it before killing it? Put a cat's panties over its head?
     
  5. Yunus

    Yunus New Member

    5,250
    0
    0
    BBC News - I'm a Celebrity... producers avoid cruelty charges

    From that article it seems pretty clear to me this is just an attempt for the RSPCA to get publicity. Basically the law says you can't kill animals on TV for entertainment, ok fair enough. But they did it for food, they ate the animal. What's the problem then?
     
  6. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    Rat, squirrel, what's the difference, IMO. I remember my brother-in-law and i placing an operator-assisted call to Beijing in an attempt to contact a restaurant that specialized in farm-raised rat recipes for potential squirrel cooking use.

    They ate it, seems like BS to me. Had they slow-roasted a kitten on TV and NOT eaten it, that would be more prosecution-worthy, IMO.
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
  7. cpttango30

    cpttango30 New Member

    13,934
    4
    0
    I didn't think Rats were even considered animals?

    That is a new one to me.

    Let me guess they want you to trap and relocate to a wild area for them to live free right.
     
  8. Highpower

    Highpower New Member

    1,546
    0
    0
    People for the
    Eating of
    Tasty
    Animals

    :D
     
  9. Walley

    Walley New Member

    264
    0
    0
    The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated.

    Mohandas Gandhi

    Could be that the people in PETA are just trying to get people to work to earn that greatness.
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
  10. skullcrusher

    skullcrusher New Member

    10,888
    1
    0
    What a load of hooey.

    If outlawing the eating of farm animals, wild animals and any meat is greatness, then I will remain mediocre. Ghandi also believed that ancestors were reborn as cows.
     
  11. OC357

    OC357 New Member

    482
    1
    0
    Was that a regular rat or a free range rat??? :D



    OC
     
  12. MichaelG

    MichaelG New Member

    158
    0
    0
    What's the difference?
     
  13. hunter Joe

    hunter Joe New Member

    2,361
    1
    0
    It' a damned shame that groups like PETA, The Human Society of America, SPCPA or whatever letters those b-otches use, don't tunnel all the monetary resources they get from the idiots that support them to feed the hungry. IMO this is just a waste of God given talents and is sinful.

    In some countries people have to eat dogs, cats, gophers, rats, bats, and anything else they can kill to stay alive.

    In the United States, PETA kills unprecedented number of dog, cats, and other domesticated animals because they don't have the recourses to keep them alive and believes that they are saving these animals from a fate worst than death. Daa.

    And yet, there are staving people in America and around the world that these animal rights activist don't give a damned about because these activist yahoos go home to a nice meal for supper every night in their beautiful houses with their well fed fat children.
     
  14. Walley

    Walley New Member

    264
    0
    0
    I happen to know several members of PETA and in no way do they advocate that people should become vegans. They are most concerned on how an animal is treated before and when it is slaughtered and how animals are raised for and merchandized in the pet industry. They are also opposed to the using of animals for research especially in the cosmetics industry. All of these friends are avid hunters.

    When I was young my father told me to know the truth of a matter before you condemn it. He always said to open your mind before you open your mouth.

    Over half of the people on this earth believe in reincarnation so I guess we should always ignore anything they have to say
     
  15. skullcrusher

    skullcrusher New Member

    10,888
    1
    0
    I guess that is why PETA puts up billboards that say "Feeding meat to your kid is child abuse."
     
  16. Dzscubie

    Dzscubie New Member

    2,508
    0
    0
    Walley, everyone’s belief is bent to the way they think and truth is a very flexible thing. Truth is not as clear as you state, what is truth…

    Man condom’s what he/she believes in and what “they” want and to hell with anyone else and their beliefs.

    Animals are put here as part of the food chain and MY BELIEF is that they are below me on that food chain and therefore I am following the natural order of life by killing and eating them. I don’t torture or maim or prolong their death I kill as quickly as possible and if I miss (poor shot at a deer) I will track the blood trail to put the creature out of it’s pain and to get my meat.

    Walley Please tell me, since you know PETA people on a personal level and I don’t, I have only met them in an official capacity, what do they consider a proper way to kill an animal? A bullet to the brain? Cut the throat? Tell them TANGO stories and scare them to death? Dead is dead and how you reach there is just a minor blip on life’s scope. Most normal people don’t and would not torture a creature, so to me PETA’s concerns don’t hold water unless they want everyone to just eat plants.

    This rat thing is just PETA putting forth their agenda and their version of the truth.

    BTW, rat is actually pretty good, taste a lot like chicken.
    (I spent quite a few years in Southeast Asia so yes I’ve eaten rat.)
     
  17. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    If you take a look at the article, this wasn't PETA; it was the RSPCA or something in New South Wales, different group.

    Someone had mentioned that it was wrong for the PETA people to raise money for what they seemed to consider a pointless exercise (not a quote) or use of money; that isn't really for us to decide, now is it? I am of the opinion that as citizens of this country, the PETA people are free to solicit funds for their activities, so long as those activities are legal. I personally don't give to "feed the hungry" campaigns, because (amongst other reasons) i see no reason to encourage overpopulation in areas where it has become such a problem as to cause widespread starvation/malnutrition. Such conditions are likely to breed the next worldwide pandemic. I would rather contribute to an organization that keeps me from seeing as many stray cats on my way to work.

    No, i am not a member of or contributor to PETA. I have & do contribute to animal rescue and care organizations.

    I wonder, if a charity was started to deliver hay & such to feed a population of deer or elk starving due to their own overpopulation (and arguably from displacement by humans), would people think that was a good idea? edit* upon re-reading, this seems a bit mean; contribute to whichever charities you wish, and i will do the same. :)
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
  18. skullcrusher

    skullcrusher New Member

    10,888
    1
    0
    No, gello, it was not PETA, but the OP asked if we have this in the US.

    First, there is a horrible show "I'm a Celebrity, Get me out of Here!" so yes

    The animal 'rights' group is similar to PETA, so yes.

    Both are abominations, imo. Hell, they even had Stuttering John Melendez as one of the celebs once. :eek: