What caliber?

Discussion in 'Revolver Handguns' started by laxexquis, Feb 11, 2009.

  1. laxexquis

    laxexquis New Member

    17
    0
    0
    Hello,

    You might of seen my other posts in general handgun discussion. I have been looking at Walthers.

    I am a beginner with guns and was told that a revolver is a good gun to start with. I defiantly want to go with a Smith and Wesson, just because right now they are kinda of paired with Walther and I am a big fan of Walther.

    I was looking at them on the S&W website.

    So for a begginner, what caliber or kind of bullet do you recomend for me.

    I want something good enough for home defense and good for practicing at the range. I also will be carrying this gun sometimes, so I would like something fairly concealable.

    So first, what type of caliber should I get? I presume .357 Magnum is too powerful for a beginner Second, out of all the S&W revolvers, which one would you recommend me?

    I am still considering the Walther PPS, but I thought maybe I will add a nice revolver to that consideration.

    Thanks,
    John
     
  2. 30-30remchester

    30-30remchester New Member

    459
    0
    0
    if you are unaware all 357 magnums will shoot the much milder 38 specials so dont be afraid of the 357.its a matter of choice and usage. i would always suggest 4"to 6" barrel unless your only goal is ultra cocealability and 10 yard or less defense. adjustable sight are a great bonus. smith makes 3 frame sizes of 357's. the J frame is a small frame 5 shot model for concealabilty, then the L frame is the middle of the road sized frame( my 5' tall wife shoots one well as do i at 6'-4"). then they have the large N frame. this sometimes gives problems with smaller handed shooters. weight is also a factor as the small ones are light and the large ones are heavy. the mid sized L frame is a popular choice.
     

  3. Franciscomv

    Franciscomv New Member

    1,257
    0
    0
    I think you should go with a .357 with a 4" barrel. It's a good all around gun, you can shoot .38 rounds for target practice and slowly get used to full house magnum loads.

    Something like this: Product: Model 686 Revolver - 4", 6-Shot



    Concealment will depend on your size and the kind of clothes you wear. With the right holster you can carry a full sized S&W 686.

    I know you like Smith & Wesson, I love their wheelguns too, but you should take a good look at Ruger's SP101 with a 3" barrel if concealment is one of your main concerns. It's one of the best carry .357's out there. IMHO, 3" is the minimum barrel length you want in a .357 (I prefer 4"). If you can find a model 66 S&W with a 3" barrel in good shape, that would be a great choice as well.
     
  4. Quis custodiet

    Quis custodiet New Member

    27
    0
    0
    A Model 19 or Model 66 with a 4" barrel, or a Model 15 (.38 Spl) will suit your needs well. These are K-frame revolvers; larger than the J-frame but lighter than the L-frame and N-frame guns. A good compromise for a carry gun.

    You can save quite a bit with a Model 15, which being a non-magnum has fallen out of favor with some shooters.
     
  5. laxexquis

    laxexquis New Member

    17
    0
    0
    Would a 7 round be too much for concealed carry?

    I suppose 6 round is better for that?
     
  6. BILLYBOB44

    BILLYBOB44 New Member

    1,259
    0
    0
    .357 Models?

    Go to GunBroker.com. Hit the revolver link, enter S&W 357. you'll see a great selection and get an idea of the price range. A decent used S&W 357 will run you $400+ but you get what you pay for. I've heard of some problems with the newer models (with the hammer lock), so you might avoid them. Just a thought. I would stay with the 6 shot models. More tried/true IMO. Good Luck!:D
     
  7. robocop10mm

    robocop10mm Lifetime Supporting Member Lifetime Supporter

    11,380
    1
    0
    The 7 shot .357's will be N-frame guns. Much larger than the "traditional" K-frame. If you plan on shooting .38's and occasionally magnums, go with the K-frame. More concealable than either the L or N-frames but do not hold up well to high volume .357's. 100/year is fine.
     
  8. stalkingbear

    stalkingbear Active Member

    4,077
    4
    38
    The late legendary Bill Jordan would disagree with K frames being good for only 100 rounds per year. True they will go out of time quicker, especially using nothing but full power loads, but they are good for 10s of thousands of rounds of mixed ammo velocity levels. Since most practice will assume be done with 38 specials, they should last more than any of us would be able to shoot-if we're not exhibition shooters or the like. Bottom line is the K frames such as models 19, or 66, or especially L frames will stand up to a lifetime of shooting.
     
  9. Bighead

    Bighead New Member

    643
    0
    0
    The 7-shot 686 is an L-Frame gun. It is the same size as the 6-shot model, with chambers cut closer together in the cylinder to add the extra shot. The N-frame .357s are 8-shot models.

    I agree with previous posts that if you want to carry the gun the K-frame would be a better choice, but Smith & Wesson only new K-frame guns coming out of Smith & Wesson are .38 Specials. Bill Jordan's beloved Model 19, and its stainless cousin the Model 66 Combat Magnum have been replaced in the Smith lineup by the L-frame Models 619/620.

    I think the .357 Magnum is a good choice for your revolver, and if you are considering carrying it then I would suggest you try to find a used Model 13 or its stainless cousin the Model 65 in either three or four inch barrel configuration. The Model 13 with a 3-inch barrel was the issue piece of the FBI before they transitioned to semi-autos. Other good choices would be the above mentioned Models 19/66, but I would replace the adjustable Smith & Wesson sights with Cylinder & Slides Extreme Duty sights.

    I don't want to seem like I am discounting the L-Frame guns because they are excellent, but they are large, heavy guns. If the gun is mostly for range time and home protection I think you will find L-Frame & N-Frame guns an excellent choice. If you want to carry these guns as CCW you will need to consider their size & weight.

    Good Luck

    PS: I recently shot the PPS 9mm and found it an excellent piece.
     
  10. robocop10mm

    robocop10mm Lifetime Supporting Member Lifetime Supporter

    11,380
    1
    0
    The K-frames will not self destruct if you shoot more than 100 rds of .357 a year. They will begin to show some relatively minor problems after only a few years of repeated use of Magnums. End shake cylinder WILL become readily apparent relatively quickly (after about 500-750 rounds of magnums). This condition is not a huge issue until it gets severe. It will eventually cause misfires with hard primers (CCI magnum primers). It is fairly easy to correct, I have "fixed" several dozen 66's with end shake cylinder.

    My point was the 686 will remain relatively maintenance free for thousands of rounds of Magnums. The 19/66 will need some maintenance but will not be "shot out". I had the pleasure of meeting Bill Jordan prior to his death. THAT was a real man!

    The L-frame is definately NOT the same as the K-frame. Cylinder has larger diameter, hammer is different, cylinder window is larger, space between the barrel and top strap is larger on the L-Frame. The 686 cylinder will not even fit inside the 66 cylinder window. The only real similarity is the grip frame. They are the same.

    Saying the K-frame is the same as the L-frame is like saying the L-frame is the same as the N-frame. Holsters are different, Speed loaders are different.
    I guess it is the fact that the grips are EXACTLY the same can cause some confusion.
     
  11. laxexquis

    laxexquis New Member

    17
    0
    0
    I see what you mean with the K frame, it being smaller and more concealable, but I only plan on using the 38s at the range, and have magnums in it the rest of the time. No gun in the K series is rated for magnum. I guess you could use it anyway, but I wouldn't want to do that.

    I think it's between the L or the J.

    It's a gun I will not carry with me all the time, but maybe if I feel I would want it. I would wear it with a suit, or regular clothes, probably with a shoulder holster.

    But I also want this gun for home defense, and for shooting at the range.

    Do you think that a 4 inch barrel is the minimum for my situation? I like the size of the 3 inch better, but I presume it affects its accuracy a lot. WOuld getting a 3 inch be a mistake?

    Also, would you notice a difference between a 3" J-frame, and a 3" L-frame?

    I may just go with the PPS, but I'm still thinking about a revolver.
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2009
  12. Franciscomv

    Franciscomv New Member

    1,257
    0
    0
    You certainly would notice a huge difference between an L frame and a J frame. Here's a quick snap of my 686 (L frame) and 640 (J frame) revolvers.

    For a first revolver, I think you'll be better off with a 4" barrel L frame. Especially if concealed carry isn't your first concern.

    Don't get me wrong, I LOVE my little J-frames, but they wouldn't be my first choice for a range or home defense gun.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. laxexquis

    laxexquis New Member

    17
    0
    0
    Ok, so right now it's between the 620 L-Series, and the 686 L-Series, both four inch barrel.

    As far as I can see the 620 can hold one more round, is a little smaller overall, and in my opinion a little better looking just because the under barrel curves up.

    Now, I know the 686 is a lot more popular, so is it a better gun?

    What are your thoughts on the differences?
     
  14. Franciscomv

    Franciscomv New Member

    1,257
    0
    0
    You can get the 686 with a 6 or 7 shot cylinder.

    IMHO, they are both excellent guns. Go with whichever you like most, you won't regret it. I picked a 686 because I got a good deal on it, but I wouldn't mind owning a 620.
     
  15. Bighead

    Bighead New Member

    643
    0
    0
    Any K or L frame gun is going to serve you fine in three or four inch barrel.

    The Model 13/65 would be my choice for target shooting, home defense, and concealed carry.

    I would probably avoid a J-frame guns unless you are going to carry all the time (even then I might still go with a 3-inch barrel Model 13). I consider J-frame 2-inch guns expert guns because of the light weight and short barrel. If you decide you do want a snubby I would recommend the Model 442/642 in .38 Special, or a model 640 with heavy barrel in .357 Magnum.

    Smith 640 (I would trade out for boot grip like Eagle Grips Secret Service model)
    [​IMG]
     
  16. Bighead

    Bighead New Member

    643
    0
    0
    Of course you could always get a .44 Magnum Model 29 and shoot .44 Specials through it...

    You could get the 3-inch shown below, or a 4-inch mountain gun, or a the 6.5 inch (my choice, but you ain't carrying it concealed very easy)

    Smith Model 29 3-Inch
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2009
  17. BILLYBOB44

    BILLYBOB44 New Member

    1,259
    0
    0
    Model 66 3"

    Did Smith make a 66 in 3"? I haven't heard of any of them made in that length. 2 1/2=4=6=8 3/8" are all that I'm aware of? Teach me if I'm wrong, thanks Bill:confused:
     
  18. BILLYBOB44

    BILLYBOB44 New Member

    1,259
    0
    0
    Heavy Duty 357

    You're exactly right Robo. The L frame was orginally marketed to be a heavy duty(short of N frame) 357 that could fit the same hands as the Model 19/66. The grip frame is the same as K frame.All (MOST) parts above the grip are larger.:)
     
  19. robocop10mm

    robocop10mm Lifetime Supporting Member Lifetime Supporter

    11,380
    1
    0
    3" was not a production length for the 66. The 65 was available in 3". I have one, DAO, my favorite concealable revolver.
     
  20. Franciscomv

    Franciscomv New Member

    1,257
    0
    0