US Warns Iran Not To Fight Back Against Israeli Attack

Discussion in 'The Club House' started by Gh0zt36, Feb 3, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Gh0zt36

    Gh0zt36 Active Member

    1,523
    0
    36
    http://www.infowars.com/us-warns-ir...attack/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

    The USS Abraham Lincoln warship has remained stationed in the Strait of Hormuz despite an Iranian threat that no more aircraft carriers should transit the sensitive oil choke point as tensions in the Persian Gulf continue to simmer with Washington warning Tehran it will join an Israeli attack if Iran dares to fight back in any way.

    Stratfor’s latest naval update map shows that the USS Lincoln has not moved from its position having transited the Strait almost two weeks ago. Similarly, the USS Carl Vinson has also remained in its position, suggesting US Naval officials are satisfied with the strategic position of the two warships as Israel prepares to launch an attack on Iran in which the US could quickly become embroiled.


    _________________________________________________________________






    What a joke our government is . They are such war mongers. But they have no problem throwing our young men and women into the meat grinder cause most of those giving the orders at the highest level never seen a day of combat in their lives and know how how truly effing horrible war is . If we are attacked in retaliation when world war III really kicks into high gear which we most certainly will be because Iran is going to retaliate and Obama will attack on the premise of self defense even though theyre basically starting this war by proxy because everyone knows Irael doesnt do anything without our OK . I hope their target is DC and all those evils F#@k's get vaporized.
     
  2. Tackleberry1

    Tackleberry1 New Member

    6,165
    0
    0
    Wow,

    I'm not sure where to start...

    1. Iran is a threat "despite Ron Paul's views". I've no problem with Pre positioning strategic forces in response to thier spoken vows.
    2. Israel is the ONLY US Ally in the ME. Should they deem a strike necessary you bet your ASS the US should and will come to their defense.
    3. Isreal can and will strike any perceived threat REGARDLESS of Obams wishes.

    The Isrealis know full well that Congress, not the Apologizer and Chief, hold the purse strings and there has never been a shortage of Isrealis support in either the House or the Senate.

    Tack
     

  3. Gh0zt36

    Gh0zt36 Active Member

    1,523
    0
    36
    Yadda yadda yadda . All I ask you sir is how many countries has Iran directly attacked in the past 10 years and how many did we attack in 2011 alone? Iran isnt a threat Iran is defending itself against all the saber rattling and Oil embargos levied against it . Its amazing how many sheeple actually buy into the mainline talking points . As a soldier Im really surprised you say that tack. My 67yo pal went into the VA a coupe weeks ago and there were kids ALL OVER the goddamn place with no arms blown off half of their faces , one chic , gorgeous little broad considering had no arms and no legs at all ..... The only reason were leaning on Iran is OIL period . If we were going to attack everybody that spouted rhetoric periodically North Korea woulda been a parking lot a lonnnnnnng ass time ago.
     
  4. Tackleberry1

    Tackleberry1 New Member

    6,165
    0
    0
    Absolutely oil is the magnet that keeps us engaged in the ME. I never denied that, but we know Iran funds Hezbollah to "indirectly" attack Isreal and we know many of the IED's that injure our troops are made in Iran. Once again using proxy forces to attack us and our allies.

    This is a despotic regime hell bent on nukeing Isreal and would not hesitate to smuggle one into the US to hit us.

    1. You don't win an argument by name calling so tone down the sheeple comments.

    2. Every Vet who took the oath knew the risk. Do not belittle there sacrifice by playing the "poor little soldier" card. No one likes to see our soldiers maimed or killed but it comes with job and is a sacrifice to be honored and respected, not lamented to win an argument.

    Tack
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2012
  5. Tackleberry1

    Tackleberry1 New Member

    6,165
    0
    0
    ...and FYI...I carry 11 pieces of Govt Hardware in my lower back due a fractured spine in service to this nation.

    Tack
     
  6. Gh0zt36

    Gh0zt36 Active Member

    1,523
    0
    36
    Im not belittling their service at all but the cold hard truth is that if we wernt in Iraq in the first place Iran woulda had no one to blow up with their IED's and as far as Hezbollah

    A) Israel is a soverign nation completely capable of defending themselves due to the fact we've armed them to the TEETH with state of the art weapons systems and dont need our help dealing with a few mortars or standard garden variety rockets .

    B) nearly the same that could be said for hezbollah could be said for Blackwater / Z / whateverelse they call theirselves


    And I think the ayatollahs rhetoric is just that , they know theyre finished if they nuke ANYONE , I bet even russia and china would join in on the melee if Iran started lobing nukes around
     
  7. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    I don't agree with you on this; Israel isn't really known for holding back when the target is clear or cowtowing to U.S. demands. My favorite example of Israeli intelligence taking care of business: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wrath_of_God Those people are not to be effed with, IMO.


    I think there is enough American blood in the sands of the middle east already, but i support U.S. military support of Israel. I do wish they would consider the nuclear options, given that Iran seems so interested in nuclear options research.
     
  8. Tackleberry1

    Tackleberry1 New Member

    6,165
    0
    0
    Sir

    Your mindset is frighteningly similar to the appesers of the 1930's who's beliefs were espoused by former British PM Nevil Chamberlin who chose endless negotiation with Hitler despite Germany's obvious military build up in violation of the Versailles treaty.

    Had Britain and France acted in 36 or 37 they could have jointly subdued German aggression and saved millions of lives.

    When the Jewish State says Never Again they mean it and if Irans peaceable citizens lack the courage to throw off their current regime then they will be deserving of the collateral damage headed there way.

    Tack
     
  9. Georgiahunter

    Georgiahunter New Member

    506
    0
    0
    Let me jump in for a minute. Iran has directly threatened the lives of our troops in the carriers and may vert well act on that threat if we don't attack. Not only that (which alone is reason enough to go to war) but they have continued a nuclear program even though they have been told to stand down. Not only that but it is our job to protect our allies when they are being threatened. Period. No questions asked.
     
  10. Tackleberry1

    Tackleberry1 New Member

    6,165
    0
    0
    By my count the score is:
    Tack 2
    Ghost 0
     
  11. hiwall

    hiwall Well-Known Member

    4,269
    22
    48
    I might as well give my two cents worth. I think Iran's talk is just talk. While they might do (and probably are) some back door stuff against Big Satan and Little Satan I doubt they would do direct attacks. I agree that Israel can take care of its self and will always do whatever it thinks it has to. I am not a Ron Paul supporter but I would like to see our troops come home and stop all the wars. I could not be more proud of our troops and I would really like them to keep all their arms and legs. In my view if a country makes us go to war with them I say dismantle a couple nukes by dropping them from a B2 on top of them. We have got to stop fighting wars where our troops have to be afraid of shooting the wrong guy. We should never go to war unless we are going to kill them all ( and let Allah sort them out).
     
  12. Chainfire

    Chainfire Well-Known Member Supporter

    5,239
    288
    83
    More weapons of mass destruction?

    Too many people make too much money on wars for us to ever be at peace with the world. Lives are a dime a dozen and the almighty dollar rules.
     
  13. BlueTurf

    BlueTurf New Member

    1,038
    0
    0
    I believe if Israel and Iran were to go to war with each other, and other countries stayed out of their conflict, including the U.S., Israel would waste Iran in a very short time. I know that a conflict between Israel and Iran would surely involve other countries, and largely because of oil, but it would be nice to see just those two countries fight it out. I think we all know we will be seeing a continuous global conflict taking place.
     
  14. c3shooter

    c3shooter Administrator Staff Member

    21,343
    215
    63
    If you want to start a political thread, do so in politics.

    If you want the thread to stay open, then keep it civil, and stay away from the name calling.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.