They had a CZ VZ 58 and compared to other AKs the thing is basically completely different.....granted it's 830 bucks for the thing....but I loved the feel and look of it....and as far as I know CZ is an underated brand of firearms but they are excellent.....and it was so TINY! Compared to the regular AKs which is a big plus for me.....but then I saw the next thing. A pre 2005 model of a Ruger mini 14 with a side rail mount with scope rings on it.....for only 430 bucks.....I am tempted to get that thing because then it's a more economical .223 easier to maintain than an AR and hell it's already got a rail mount on it! Can anyone say Red dot for me? Hahaha.....but I don't know yet.....CZ 58.....or the Ruger .223 for half of the CZ......I was told the CZ would probably pic up ALOT of value later on...but I don't know. I'm thinking the Ruger because I already have an SKS...and if I get the Ruger I have a .223...so I have 2 of the Main ammo bases covered...the last being the .308....which they had a really nice (AND EXPENSIVE) PTR with a magpul stock and a high quality bipod on it...... BAH I hate having choices....I WANT THEM ALL lol. Maybe people can clue me in on the good value of said weapons?