The real reason for gunwalker/gunrunner

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by Cory2, Jul 13, 2011.

  1. Cory2

    Cory2 New Member

    575
    0
    0
    Does anyone know how many guns, exactly, have been sold to Mexico by the ATF since 2006 when gunwalker began?

    Reason I ask is because i was reading on the brady bunch site (know thy enemy) that there has been 20,000 American guns recovered in Mexico (since 2007 interesting timing huh?)... I wonder how many of those are there because of the ATF?

    Manufacturing support for stricter gun laws.... Didn't they say they had gps devices in some of the guns they sold? That would definately assist in finding them to use as "evidence" no?....

    It seems to me that the media is going about this all wrong. I haven't seen in any media suggesting this was an attempt to create "proof" for more gun laws and restrictions, but I think it is pretty apparent that that was its main purpose.


    Opinions?
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2011
  2. culdee

    culdee New Member

    293
    0
    0
    gps

    OK now you got me worried, how do we know whether any guns that we might have bought have chips impanted in them? Any one know of a way to scan for them? Not that I am paranoid but it could be defended by the admin as saying they are used to recover stolen guns, ya know.:eek:
     

  3. anm2_man

    anm2_man Member

    504
    2
    18

    No - If they had chips in them, they could of followed them. The scumbags at the Justice Dept, figured they would let some guns go across the border, some would be recovered, and thus a case for more gun control. Well they didn't think that an American (border agent) would be murdered with one of those guns. As far as I'm concerned, the white house and everybody else should be on trial for MURDER ! :mad:
     
  4. freefall

    freefall New Member

    2,325
    3
    0
    Looking at this from the (far) outside, it seems obvious to me that the whole reason for this bollocks of a plan was to be able to prove that the guns being used in the Mexican drug violence were indeed bought from legal arms dealers in the US, thus necessitating more controls, more agents, and larger budgets. If anybody has a better suggestion I'm willing to listen but hard to convince.
     
  5. alsaqr

    alsaqr Well-Known Member Supporter

    6,128
    117
    63
    The purpose of the putrid Gunrunner/Walker/Whatever plan is to motivate congress into passing a draconian "assault weapons ban".

    i will say it again: Why in hades would a drug lord pay huge prices for semi-auto guns smuggled in from the US when he can buy a container full of rock and roll AK-47s for $250 apiece?
     
  6. Richard47

    Richard47 New Member

    13
    0
    0
    The Cartels have billions of dollars, and access to Mexican Army weapons. They have attack helicopters, and even submarines.

    And the goverment REALLY wants us to believe an outfit with resources like that sends folks hiking thrugh the desert with false IDs so "Texas gunstores" will sell them a Century "AK" or a Glock 9?

    No wonder the Cartels are winning.....
     
  7. easterner123

    easterner123 New Member

    348
    0
    0
    This is a great point. Why risk going through the United States with weapons when they can be so easily had from South America, which is flooded with cheap soviet style weapons, as well as weapons we gave "freedom fighters" that were against communism during the cold war, and now no longer have an enemy to fight?

    Illegal AKs are 1) Full auto 2) Much cheaper and 3) Available in bulk.

    Its awfully suspicious to order 50 AKs and 100,000 rounds of 5.45x39 from an American gunstore to Mexico ya know? :eek:

    The operation was stupid. If it was in a series of controlled stings (ie. gun crosses, proven illegal, recovered within 24-48 hours) then maybe it would not be a constitutional outrage. But the fact that one of our own men was killed...

    Now, I lost my guns to a canoing accident a while back, damn near lost myself :eek:. But if I were a new gunowner, try buying a shotgun or two off grandpa to keep off the books... just in case.
     
  8. gocritter

    gocritter New Member

    65
    0
    0
    How soon we forget, Waco, Clinton, the justice dept. The laws billy bob wanted to pass. Hmmm, the sec. of state now is? The president, and I use the word loosely, comes from what state and background? If that don't fit you have the wrong pair of gloves and your 2 year old just crawled in a plastic bag an took a walk in the woods.
     
  9. Millwright

    Millwright New Member

    149
    0
    0
    C2,

    Keep in mind the Spin Machine is maxed out - both in the anti-gun and government camps - right about now. We're going to see a lot of factoids popping up in MSM "stories" - that are pretty much PRs - from these groups. Its a face-saving manuver as the MSM hasn't studiously ignored all the blood in the water from Rep. Issa's HCGR hearings and its consequential impact.

    Its emerging "gun walking" (a sobriquet created by Mr. D. Codrea of Examiner), is/has taken place in CA, NM, TX and FL (and perhaps other states). The FL connection may prove the most damaging as it has ties to Honduras where, you might recall, USAG Holder spoke on the subject of contraband guns in March of '09 . What remains questionable is the purpose of what are essentially small-scale buys of very expensive weapons.

    The Cartels have billions in assets. They have business/criminal connections worldwide. They have heavy transport aircraft, ships, even submarines. As noted by others here, they can purchase all sorts of light infantry weapons on the world market for a far cheaper per unit cost. Its also known a very large number of the weapons seized by the Mexican government are traceable to USDOS sales to various governments in Central America and Mexico. But we haven't heard anything about this issue from our own government. In short, a hairy connundrum. So let's shave it with Occam's Razor.

    The cartels have a vested interest in keeping their supply lines direct, cheap and secure. OFF/GW meets none of those criterium. No one can argue the Cartels don't act - often with lethality - in their own best interests.

    OTOH, gun contol/prohibition groups worldwide have a vested interest in creating situations supportive of their pogrom of private disarmament. Our President recently assured Sarah Brady he was working "under the radar" on gun control. He and USAG Holder both made statements supportive of finding ways to enhance gun control at least as far back as 3/09. The President has a long "anti-gun" history, being a past board member of the Joyce Foundation, and voting for every anti-gun measure that came his way as a member of the IL legislature. His administration has been characterized by a series of executive fiats and actions of dubious legality. So creating a scenario furthering his objectives is more reasonable than un. Plus, he had a ready-made vehicle from his predecessor's administration.

    Operation Fast and Furious was created during the G. H. Bush administration. The former President apparently took personal interest in stopping the southward flow of arms. During this phase straw purchasers were prosecuted and guns interdicted. But what better sitution could the Obama Administration be handed ? All they had to do was order field agents not to interdict the guns, thereby insuring increased trafficing and mayhem on both sides of the border, while going through standard investigative motions. Now here I'm just guessing, but its reported ATF agents were ignorant of other players on the field. FBI and DHS played a role in financing and developing "snitiches" making the straw purchases and handing over the guns to others. Both of these threads lead back to DOJ and AG Holder; the same Holder that testified to Rep. Issa's committee he had "no direct knowledge" of OFF and PGW.

    Y'all can connect the dots. >MW
     
  10. aafasano

    aafasano New Member

    9
    0
    0
     
  11. Cory2

    Cory2 New Member

    575
    0
    0
    Well said and well written, sir! +1
     
  12. CA357

    CA357 New Member Supporter

    19,847
    3
    0
    Holder Bragged About Project Gunrunner in 2009

    By Barbara Hollingsworth, Washington Examiner

    On May 3, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder testified before House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa's committee that he only learned about the government's sale of weapons to Mexican drug cartels "in the last few weeks."

    But Big Government found a 2009 speech by Holder on the Department of Justice's own website that proves the attorney general was well aware of Operation Gunrunner back in 2009:

    …at the arms trafficking conference in Cuernavaca, Holder not only acknowledged the program, he bragged that he was in the process of expanding it:

    "Last week, our administration launched a major new effort to break the backs of the cartels. My department is committing 100 new ATF personnel to the Southwest border in the next 100 days to supplement our ongoing Project Gunrunner, DEA is adding 16 new positions on the border, as well as mobile enforcement teams, and the FBI is creating a new intelligence group focusing on kidnapping and extortion. DHS is making similar commitments, as Secretary Napolitano will detail."

    Read more: Holder Bragged About Project Gunrunner in 2009 - Mexico - Fox Nation
     
  13. Millwright

    Millwright New Member

    149
    0
    0
    What I'd like to see/find is a statistical survey banging the caliber/make/model of guns "walked" against the "hit list" of anti-gun prohibitionists. I'll bet a long bill there's a "one for one" correspondence !

    If that comparison "proves out" its pretty much damning evidence the sole purpose of Operation Fast and Furious, aka Project Gun Walker was to create an atmosphere conducive to further restrictions on gun purchases by Americans. Its increasingly apparent these "gun walks" were conducted in contempt of federal law on gun exports and the known effect upon Mexican citizens.

    But there can be other scenarios in play south of our border senior ATF/FBI/DHS personnel could be aware of. What if they were selling these arms to citizens/orgs resisting the persecutions of the Cartels ? It certainly fits the "onesy/twosey style of purchase. And it would serve as the perfect OUT for the Obama Administration to obsfuscate this whole issue. Could that be a possible ploy for the DOJ erecting the "smoke screen" its displayed to Rep. Issa's Committee ?

    Jest wonderin' >MW
     
  14. Sniper03

    Sniper03 Supporting Member Supporter

    7,667
    67
    48
    I am beginning to think that Operation GUNWALKER could have been an elaborate scheme and ploy to implement stricter gun laws in a round about way. I saw on the news this morning due to the situation in Mexico that OUR GOVERNMENT created, as usuall has cost the lives of several border agents and others... Someone like Eric Holder for a prime example and the group needs to be 100% accountable for their stupidity and botching up such a critical operation and the deaths of the border officers. Or as I stated maybe it was not a botch up at all? They are now proposing that if anyone buys two or more ARs for example, or Receivers I might add, it must be immediately reported to the ATF!
    That means as a law abiding citizen if I buy one for myself and one for my grandson I am reported immediately to the ATF. GO FIGURE!
    Another attack on our second amendment rights!:mad:

    03
     
  15. opaww

    opaww New Member

    4,868
    0
    0
    Holder, osamabama needs to share a cell with bubba for the rest of their lives.
     
  16. Sniper03

    Sniper03 Supporting Member Supporter

    7,667
    67
    48
    opaww,

    I will second that!

    03
     
  17. rpg1520

    rpg1520 New Member

    6
    0
    0
    I'm glad this was exposed and people are now waking up to these false flag operations by the government
     
  18. gocritter

    gocritter New Member

    65
    0
    0
    Where on the network news did you see or hear this information to the extent it should be exposed? Are we preaching to the choir again? We all know the present bag of wind that resides in the white house gets a free pass on everything. It seems he takes his direction of rule from Hugo Chavez. When ABC,NBC<and CBS start to pound on this then we know we have a chance, until then the lefty lemmings just crawl along behind his highness.
     
  19. Millwright

    Millwright New Member

    149
    0
    0
    We also know, GC, any criticism - no matter how deserved - of our President brings out a sh*t storm of "race cards", as witness recent remarks by Rep. Shelia Jackson Lee (D) TX.

    We'll know the Demoncrats have "hit the wall" when they start playing the "race card" for Holder and the President over this issue ! >MW
     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2011
  20. therewolf

    therewolf New Member

    8,409
    1
    0
    I don't mean to sound obtuse, but why/how does irresponsible actions by

    Mexicans show we're irresponsible with guns?

    Federal agencies have shown they're pretty irresponsible with guns,

    but nobody's shoving gun control laws down their throats...