Sherriff's demo of how magazine size makes very little difference

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by KJG67, May 2, 2013.

  1. KJG67

    KJG67 New Member

    1,428
    0
    0
    I didn't see this posted anywhere.

    Pretty good video. You could certainly pick it apart, but he makes a good demonstration. Nice job Sheriff.


    [ame]http://youtu.be/MCSySuemiHU[/ame]
     
  2. JimRau

    JimRau Well-Known Member Supporter

    5,028
    73
    48
    I saw this some time ago. But lets not confuse the 'emotions' with truth and facts!;)
     

  3. Garadex

    Garadex New Member

    1,267
    0
    0
    Used this as a reference in a school assignment. Got an A. :D
     
  4. manta

    manta Well-Known Member Supporter

    3,027
    47
    48
    I think to anyone that knows about firearms he is stating the obvious.
     
  5. KJG67

    KJG67 New Member

    1,428
    0
    0
    Nice job. What's the summary topic of the paper?
     
  6. texaswoodworker

    texaswoodworker New Member

    10,198
    0
    0
    Yes, that was already extremely obvious to us, but the antigunners are too busy shoving their head up their ass and dancing on the graves of dead children to care. Even when thousands upon thousands of officers tell them that gun control doesn't work, they don't care. They'd rather believe their emotion based lies than look at cold hard facts.
     
  7. Garadex

    Garadex New Member

    1,267
    0
    0
    We had to do a controversial issue essay and mine was about gun control and why it doesn't work.
     
  8. danolator

    danolator New Member

    630
    0
    0
    Of course, in a real fight, the shooter would not be retrieving magazines from a barrel at waist high level. It would be interesting to see the same exercise with mags retrieved from a belt pouch, fanny pack, back pocket, or any other method of real life storage conditions. Also, the first shooter quickened his trigger pull in the second rounds which compensated for the mag change. Not exactly scientific. Just sayin'.
     
  9. willshoum

    willshoum New Member

    5,417
    0
    0
    The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly................

    What does the bad guy glean from this video..............More than you know.................:mad::mad::mad:
     
  10. JonM

    JonM Moderator

    20,110
    15
    38
    Democrats arent banning guns and magazines because of some mythical bullet count reason they are banning guns because it makes people independent and not need the false safety net of a federal or state government.

    A well armed cirizen that works for a living supporting him/herself through life doesnt need the government for anything. That means they dont need democrats telling them how to live.

    The sheriff is a buffoon if he thinks its all about shooting speed. Democrats dont care about that.

    The whole purpose of limiting magazines is to reduce the amount of people who are able to be free from government. Its got nothing to do with saving lives. Democrats are more than happy to see another thousand dead children if it advances their political antigun agenda. It wasnt even an hour passed when obama was hopping up and down in glee over those kids being dead because he knew he had a chance for more political power in the antigun arena.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2013
  11. Overkill0084

    Overkill0084 Active Member

    4,910
    2
    38
    This was posted some time back. It's a fairly good video that makes it's point well.
    Unfortunately, rational arguments and reality have little to no bearing on the argument. We are pissing into the wind if we think that some really cool argument will turn around the issue. There is no shortage of data to show that Gun control doesn't work & in fact generally makes things worse. One word: Chicago, wins the reality discussion. If the gun banners won't be reasoned with, they must be defeated.

    Short version: It's not about guns, it's about control.