OBAMA's DOG AND PONY SHOW

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by Sniper03, Jan 15, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sniper03

    Sniper03 Supporting Member Supporter

    7,713
    189
    63
    All I have to say is if Tomorrow President Obama will be "Using Children" regarding his attempt to attack our Second Amendment Right by manipulating and pulling on the emotional heart strings of Americans to try to manipulate and promote their attack on our Second Amendment Rights tomorrow on his TV Address! It was a dreaded terrible tragedy "absolutely". All our hearts went out to the victims and their families! But lets not use it as a political tool! If he does this for that reason? He truly is a low life!
    If this is what he actually does? How low can he go! And surely with all the executive orders he is mentioning he is with out doubt close to violating excessive Executive Power in the execution of his office and possible violations of Constitutional Law.

    We will see what happens! And I hope this is not what occurs during the TV Address!

    03
     
  2. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    I would give my left nut to see what happened if somebody set off a string of firecrackers during his BS; my money would be on him grabbing up a youngster to use as a human shield.
     

  3. Tackleberry1

    Tackleberry1 New Member

    6,165
    3
    0
    He will be fanked by children from Across the country who wrote letters after Sandy Hook...it will be a combination of a forceful decree regarding the "executive action" he takes and a somber...tearful parade of dead children meant to SILENCE and COWER Republican House Members.

    Our message to the House is simple. Stop Obama OR force our hand.

    Failure to stop our would be dictator in chief will mean civil war.

    Tack
     
  4. CaseyChadwell

    CaseyChadwell New Member

    825
    0
    0
    Again tack, nicely said! I vote to have a sticky for tacks thought of the day...correction...tacks thoughtS of the day.

    Obama Is scum. He is seriously abusing his power and using children to forward his agenda. I don't use my children for anything other than loving and raising, the asshat in chief should not use children in any other way than I use mine. I bet if he gets his way he won't send his children to public schools at all, let alone without armed secret service.what is wrong with the people looking out for my kids to be armed like his children? Are my children not good enough for king asswhipe?
     
  5. CaseyChadwell

    CaseyChadwell New Member

    825
    0
    0
    Sorry...went on a rant there...
     
  6. Wrecked

    Wrecked New Member

    123
    0
    0
    Obama will stand with one foot on the graves of children and one foot on the Constitution. Then use a human shield of children to insulate himself from anyone who opposes his agenda. Makes me sick to my stomach!
     
  7. Chainfire

    Chainfire Well-Known Member Supporter

    5,366
    589
    113
    So Tack, are you ready to go to war against the freely elected government over the gunshow loophole?
     
  8. OEFvet10072001

    OEFvet10072001 New Member

    30
    0
    0
    I have to agree with what the White House and the NRA president agreed on Thursday about stricter and thoroughly screen people who buy locally and especially at gun shows. I also agree on capping hi-cap 30+ AR-15mags but people clearly don't seen that the hi-caps are just accessories to AR-15's and that without getting rid of the AR's there's no point in getting rid of the hi-caps. They go hand in hand like batteries in a remote.
     
  9. chloeshooter

    chloeshooter New Member

    2,565
    0
    0
    he should have the children of the lady from GA whose lives were saved because their Daddy cared enough to teach Momma how to shoot! [but I'm betting he won't]
     
  10. OEFvet10072001

    OEFvet10072001 New Member

    30
    0
    0
    How would expressing my personal opinion in this "debate" make me a troll?!
     
  11. CaseyChadwell

    CaseyChadwell New Member

    825
    0
    0
    Seriously? I may be saying something I shouldn't and I hope I don't upset the mods, but dude, go away.
     
  12. CaseyChadwell

    CaseyChadwell New Member

    825
    0
    0
    You are starting to annoy me sir. I am sorry if that is too forward, but I feel your only reason for visiting this site is to stir sh! T.
     
  13. Tackleberry1

    Tackleberry1 New Member

    6,165
    3
    0
    Chain...

    I am ready to say NO to any unconstitutional infringement upon the bill of rights.
    I am ready to ignore any executive order regarding the 2nd Amendment.

    Whether or not that means "go to war" is not up to me. It is up to the sworn peace officers serving at both the State and Federal Levels.

    Their actions will determine where this goes...and if they know anything about the founding of this Nation and the true intent of the Second Ammendment, then they already know the consequence of choosing poorly.

    ...as I've stated before...Defence of liberty is ALWAYS the right couse of action, regardless of the uniform worn by the oppressor.

    Now...with all that said, is tomorrow the time to act? No, it's not. Anything the POTUS pukes out over the airwaves will ultimately amount to nothing more than him, bestowing upon himself, a verbal hand job.

    The Press will fawn over it...Chain will feel a "thrill" run up his leg, and the rest of us will sit back and enjoy watching the Adolescent in Chief get taken apart by Judicial and Political scholars for the glaringly obvious overreach we all expect him to attempt.

    Everyone who's followed my posts knows that the time to act is when faced with mandatory registration...and the course of action is to simply NOT register.

    Any action after that is up to each individual...but at least they will still have the choice...to stand or kneel.

    Tack
     
  14. OEFvet10072001

    OEFvet10072001 New Member

    30
    0
    0
    Seriously buddy, this freedom of speech and such is given to all and if you personally don't like it then I kindly suggest that you take your personal opinion about me, whom you don't know personally, and go to another thread. Thank you.

    OEF 10 07 01
     
  15. Warrior1256

    Warrior1256 New Member

    614
    0
    0
    Everytime you give into the antis on anything without a fight they see this as weakness. It simply encourages them to come right back with more demands. It has happened time after time in the past. Concede NOTHING.
     
  16. Tackleberry1

    Tackleberry1 New Member

    6,165
    3
    0
    OEF...

    I must ask what you think can be accomplished with stricter background checks and magazine capacity restrictions?

    ...and I must also ask how long you've been following this debate?

    Your response will shed some light on your thinking and allow me to decide if I'm debating an open minded gun owner or an anti gun troll...no offense mind you, but you are a newly minted member and we've had a rash of that sort lately.

    Tack
     
  17. OEFvet10072001

    OEFvet10072001 New Member

    30
    0
    0
    I see no point in civi's owning assault rifles be it American or Russian made. They should only be in the hands of peace officers and military personal ( paramilitary or militia are not in consideration on this point) there have been TOO many deaths. The Hi-caps for AR-15's and stricter background checks don't diminish the right to lever action, bolt action, semi auto shotguns, pump action, double barrel or even black powder rifles. I don't see how getting rid of the deadliest category in this lot "tramples" on the right to bear arms when there are plenty of other rifles AND pistols to own. Just saying. Thanks

    OEF 10 07 01
     
  18. CaseyChadwell

    CaseyChadwell New Member

    825
    0
    0
    You come to a forum, which I would venture to say you joined today, and insinuate getting rid of the most popular semi auto sporting rifle out there. How about while we give up our rights to bear arms we throw the entire constitution out the window too? The second amendment is the only one that guarantees the others. Without it the government will do as it pleases. With out it u would not have the freedom if speech you talked about. The 2nd was put in place to fight tyranny in the government, if it came down to it would you want an ar15 with a 30 round mag or your daddy's rabbit gun? Did you honestly think that coming to this site and saying what u said you would be graced with open arms and raised in the air as a hero and philosopher? There are other sites you can go to and talk about how my evil black gun is the reason people are murdered every year...I hear www.senator Feinstein.com is a good one:rolleyes: jk
     
  19. OEFvet10072001

    OEFvet10072001 New Member

    30
    0
    0
    Btw I own only two rifles. Both .30-06 both only for hunting and target shooting. I also live in Canada and have been on this forum for a month, I just tend NOT to be a gun forum troll and argue with every person who is new and expresses a difference in opinion.
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2013
  20. Yunus

    Yunus New Member

    5,250
    0
    0
    I don't see you as a troll. I am also fine with Executive Action that will actually enforce existing laws, I disagree about the magazine cap and potential AWB though. I would like to know what your reasoning is for choosing 30+, why not 20, if 20 why not 10, if 10 why not 7, if 7 why not 5, if 5 why not 1, if 1 why not 0, slippery slope and all that. But seriously why is a capacity limit a positive thing, do you think that crime will be reduced or bad guys will kill less if they use 10 round mags instead of 30? A 100 round drum I personally believe would be more of a hindrance to a criminal because they are heavy as heck when loaded, it would slow people down.

    That type of attitude is no better than someone who keeps demanding more.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.