Firearms Talk banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

3 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
It's nuts what our Gov't is trying to pass using this terrorist BS.

WASHINGTON -- The National Rifle Association is urging the Bush administration to withdraw its support of a bill that would prohibit suspected terrorists from buying firearms.
Backed by the Justice Department, the measure would give the attorney general the discretion to block gun sales, licenses or permits to terror suspects.

In a letter this week to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, NRA executive director Chris Cox said the bill, offered last week by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) ''would allow arbitrary denial of Second Amendment rights based on mere 'suspicions' of a terrorist threat.''

''As many of our friends in law enforcement have rightly pointed out, the word 'suspect' has no legal meaning, particularly when it comes to denying constitutional liberties,'' Cox wrote.

In a letter supporting the measure, Acting Assistant Attorney General Richard Hertling said the bill would not automatically prevent a gun sale to a suspected terrorist. In some cases, federal agents may want to let a sale go forward to avoid compromising an ongoing investigation.

Hertling also notes there is a process to challenge denial of a sale.

Current law requires gun dealers to conduct a criminal background check and deny sales if a gun purchaser falls under a specified prohibition, including a felony conviction, domestic abuse conviction or illegal immigration. There is no legal basis to deny a sale if a purchaser is on a terror watch list.

''When I tell people that you can be on a terrorist watch list and still be allowed to buy as many guns as you want, they are shocked,'' said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, which supports Lautenberg's bill.

In the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings, lawmakers are considering a number of measures to strengthen gun sale laws.

''Right now law enforcement carefully monitors all firearms sales to those on the terror watch list,'' said NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam. ''Injecting the attorney general into the process just politicizes it.'

6,964 Posts
We are already told what we may buy, what we may not buy, and we're made to jump through hoops to exercize rights acknowledged by the constitution.

This is just another means to set a precedent for arbitrarily denying firearm sales. By using emotion -- the concern over "terrorists" -- they can probably drum up enough support. Never mind that the word "terrorist" can apply to anyone for any reason our public servants dream up. Hell, we see articles today about people arrested for having an "arsenal" (a dozen or so firearms) and a "huge stockpile of ammunition" (a couple thousand rounds). How hard would it be to tag such an individual as a potential terrorist? Sheeple will eat this stuff up and encourage officials to "protect" them by legislating their rights away.
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.