NK vs. Army Rangers

Discussion in 'The Club House' started by usmcprofessional, Aug 3, 2011.

  1. usmcprofessional

    usmcprofessional New Member

    249
    0
    0
    just watched Deadliest Warror with North Korea fighting against U.S. Army Rangers. Rangers won of course. theres no way in hell NK could beat Ranger badasses. Of course they couldnt make it U.S. Marines vs. North Korea, cause we already did that and it would be just stating the obvious again.

    BUT, with the weapon comparisons, the AK beat the M4 hahah, hell yea, take that AR humpers.
     
  2. JonM

    JonM Moderator

    20,110
    15
    38
    first season they did a show with main weapon ak vs m16 and m16 was chosen... its all a bs show heh
     

  3. JustAnotherGunLover

    JustAnotherGunLover New Member

    49
    0
    0
    Of course we won on a tv show.... (an awesome tv show by the way!!!) But i wonna see us whip their asses in a real life war. Not saying it would be easy, but itd be more challanging the iraq or whoever we're fighting over there.... (so many different groups, i cant keep up....)
     
  4. usmcprofessional

    usmcprofessional New Member

    249
    0
    0
    SHUTUP, ill have my victory somewhere.
     
  5. c3shooter

    c3shooter Administrator Staff Member

    21,344
    220
    63
    Can introduce you to a good friend that already played the "NK vs Ranger" scenario. In 1951.
     
  6. doctherock

    doctherock New Member

    5,132
    1
    0
    My Grandfather was in Korea with the Rangers before the war ever kicked into gear. God rest his soul. He lived through the war and succumbed to old age.
     
  7. usmcprofessional

    usmcprofessional New Member

    249
    0
    0
    i know its a horsesh*t show, i mean, a force still working off of cold war tech can be a challenge? yea-no. its just like watching a football game for me. dosent really frickin matter, but still gets me giddy rootin for the home team....ahh-ahh-CHOOakwonovertheM4-excuse me.
     
  8. JustAnotherGunLover

    JustAnotherGunLover New Member

    49
    0
    0
    They'd be a challange cause its alot of them and they all have guns. I mean we'd have to bomb them like japan only not just a couple of cities but the whole country to make sure we get them all.... Like roaches....
     
  9. Ploofy

    Ploofy New Member

    1,197
    0
    0
    That scenario made me sad. No Ranger would be stupid enough to take out the sharpshooter but leave his spotter right next to the rifle. And they should have included things like Air Support, and grenades, or even body armor. And should have had at least one support weapon for both sides.
     
  10. Ploofy

    Ploofy New Member

    1,197
    0
    0
    Bullets will kill you just as dead no matter how old the gun is. Pretty much anybody who can aim is a threat, and any special ops team will be able to do that in their sleep.
     
  11. usmcprofessional

    usmcprofessional New Member

    249
    0
    0
    the war of attrition dosent work anymore. i know everyone has a hard on for the soviet union beating the germans with shear numbers, but 70 years later its gotten to the point that troops can sit on their ass and let all the tech around them do the job. NK can send the entire force they got down on us in SK and the only thing our troops would have to do to pick off is the ones that lived through all the strike packages we threw at them. their armor is sh*t. they have zero airpower, it would be like stomping on a fire ant hill but we have a sh*t load of gas and a lighter.
     
  12. fisher79

    fisher79 New Member

    221
    0
    0
    Oh lord like it matters AK,M16,M4,every frigging one will drop your a$$. The rest is history;)
     
  13. JonM

    JonM Moderator

    20,110
    15
    38
    ill second that. my antique mosin pu sniper 1944 is STILL a solid moa shooter and i can get it submoa from time to time with surplus ammo.