Mossberg or Weatherby?

Discussion in 'General Rifle Discussion' started by Tjurgensen, May 25, 2013.

  1. Tjurgensen

    Tjurgensen New Member

    85
    0
    0
    Im looking for a new rifle and have narrowed my caliber down to a 270 WSM. Now im debating on the gun. My decision is between a Weatherby Vanguard Series 2 sporter or a Mossberg 4X4. Both are wood stock, both have a 24" barrel, and both look to be quality guns. Unfortunately I have never owned neither a Mossberg or Weatherby rifle so I don't know which is better or the qualities both hold. Any suggestions or advice would be appreciated
     
  2. aandabooks

    aandabooks New Member

    1,598
    0
    0
    I've never heard any great praise for Mossberg rifles and I've never heard a bad word about Weatherby rifles. For my money I would get the Weatherby.
     

  3. DrumJunkie

    DrumJunkie New Member

    4,823
    0
    0
    I have one of the Mossberg ATR's (30-06). It shoots fine but kicks like a mule. But I attribute a lot of it to the featherweight stock. I'm hoping a wood replacement will make things less ill tempered.

    It was me looking at the choices you have I'd look at the Weatherby. Not saying the Mossberg is a bad rifle especially for the money. I just think the Weatherby is a better built gun.
     
  4. Txhillbilly

    Txhillbilly Active Member

    4,435
    28
    38
    I'd take the Weatherby over a Mossberg any day of the week.
    But why do you want a WSM caliber? The ammo is expensive,brass is hard to find,and any gains in performance are subtracted by the first two notes.

    The Vanguard series is just a Howa action,so you could also look at the Howa line of rifles. It is a very good action/rifle.
     
  5. Tjurgensen

    Tjurgensen New Member

    85
    0
    0
    Thanks for the suggestions and as for your question Txhillbilly brass is not a problem as I don't reload and the ammo is only on average ten dollars more than less expensive calibers an expense im willing to pay. I also don't shoot enough for the expense of the ammo to really build up on me.
     
  6. DrumJunkie

    DrumJunkie New Member

    4,823
    0
    0
    A 270 isn't my first choice of a round either. But as long sad your shooting I guess :)
     
  7. Anna_Purna

    Anna_Purna New Member

    7,236
    0
    0
    Of the two choices I would definitely get the Weatherby over the Mossberg.
     
  8. DrumJunkie

    DrumJunkie New Member

    4,823
    0
    0
    I have to admit I bought the Mossberg because I couldn't find anyone that had one and I wanted to know how they shot. I will say it puts the bullet where it needs to but there are better rifles out there. I guess for the money they are pretty good. But if I do change to a wood stock and I still end up not all that happy it will be a huge testament to the rifle. And it wont be a cheap rifle any more. It's that lack of assurance that causes me to not want to endorse them a whole lot.

    Though in the OPs case there where two rifles to choose from. That choice would be pretty easy for me to make for me. Thank God I have an old (sporterised)Remington 03A3. Now THAT'S a nice rifle :)
     
  9. Apex-Predator

    Apex-Predator New Member

    577
    0
    0
    Weatherby is a totally different class. That said Weatherby firearms are too big and bulky for little old me, they feel like shouldering a 2x6 plank. My 270 WSM is a slim/light Savage 11 that shoots dime sized groups.
    Only problem with the 270WSM is it is too much of a good thing, it is too darn fast for hunting here unless I am hunting a wide open field where I am expecting 300+yard shots which are rare to say the least so she does not see much action.
     
    Last edited: May 26, 2013
  10. locutus

    locutus Well-Known Member Supporter

    16,415
    305
    83
    The Weatherby in a totally different class.

    BTW, for a few bucks extra you can get a Vanguard ll with a decent stock instead of the wood.