Mobile devices and pet peeve

Discussion in 'The Club House' started by Chainfire, Aug 17, 2013.

  1. Chainfire

    Chainfire Well-Known Member Supporter

    5,360
    575
    113
    I have a warning for all of you, and you know who you are, butt-heads who drive down the street while posting on your social media devices. I see it every day, some lame sombich, hiding his or her device below the window, while bobbing and weaving down the street, spending more time looking at his or her lap than out the windshield.

    One of you is going to run over me. When you do, I am going to put that cell phone someplace that a proctologist will have to probe for hours to find. If you hurt one of my family I may just put you out of your misery. For me, life in prison may only be five years, I can take it.

    I am quite sincere, and you are forewarned, act accordingly.
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2013
  2. DrumJunkie

    DrumJunkie New Member

    4,823
    0
    0
    I never understood the desire to check my email in traffic. But I see lot of people doing to. The birth of smart phones made it much more prevalent.
     

  3. Axxe55

    Axxe55 The Apocalypse Is Coming.....

    7
    2
    0
    i understand your fustration and anger, but putting such comments out on an open forum could come back to haunt you one day. just saying.
     
  4. therewolf

    therewolf New Member

    8,409
    1
    0
    I can't make, talk to someone,or answer a call on this thing.

    BUT they call it a "smart" phone.

    Well, if it's so "smart" how come the on-off switch

    and the volume control are hellishly positioned

    where you hold the phone to talk on it? WHY?

    WHY, HUH?
     
  5. DFlynt

    DFlynt New Member

    3,038
    0
    0
    The phone is "smart" they didn't say anything about the people who designed it being "smart". ;)
     
  6. therewolf

    therewolf New Member

    8,409
    1
    0
    They're BOTH dumbass, if you ask me.

    WHAT MORON tested this product?

    They didn't have ANY problems with it?
     
  7. Gatoragn

    Gatoragn Active Member

    3,937
    13
    38
    Ole Junior says it best, Hang Up And Drive

    [ame]http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jbMkt8EY6QA[/ame]
     
  8. rjd3282

    rjd3282 New Member

    3,852
    0
    0
    Damn it Chain I've had to agree with you twice in one day. Stop it. :D
     
  9. dwmiller

    dwmiller Well-Known Member Supporter

    3,586
    339
    83
    The Smartphone just made the dumbasses that much worse by comparison;)
     
  10. 303tom

    303tom Well-Known Member

    5,215
    150
    63
    Don`t have one, don`t want one !................
     
  11. TekGreg

    TekGreg Lifetime Supporting Member Lifetime Supporter

    2,000
    0
    0
    The one and only thing that Kommifornia got right was that they require a driver to use a headset if they want to use their phone in their car, period. If you are holding the phone and looking at it, texting on it, or in any way engaged with the phone OTHER than using your headset, it is a primary offense. The LEOs will pull you over and cite you and the fines are steep.

    The best thing everyone can do is petition their lawmakers to pass similar laws and make LEOs enforce them. The only way anyone will change their behavior is if they are faced with monetary loss and the enforcement causes some drivers to pay e hefty fines. When people tell all their friends and relatives they had to pay a $400 ticket for not using a $30 headset, things will start to change.

    Studies show that a driver talking on the phone is equivalent to someone that is illegally intoxicated, Blood Alcohol Content of .08. A person texting is equivalent to TWICE that level, .16. It's time to take this problem as seriously as drunk driving. Use of a headset has proven to alleviate a lot of the problems associated with driving and calling because the driver keeps his eyes looking forward and also keeps turning his head to look at traffic - something no one does with the phone held to the side of their head.
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2013
  12. Axxe55

    Axxe55 The Apocalypse Is Coming.....

    7
    2
    0
    very well said!

    for a long time i thought it was mainly the younger teenage drivers being the problem, but that's just not true. i am seeing people of all ages doing it, men and women alike.

    it's a very serious problem that needs to be enforced. another sad thing i have seen is many LEO's doing it as well. how can they enforce laws that put lives in danger when they themselves are doing the same thing? it sets a bad example.

    i do agree that hefty fines and taking away the privelage to drive would send a message that others might wake up and see that this is problem and they are endangering other peoples lives, not just their own.
     
  13. Chainfire

    Chainfire Well-Known Member Supporter

    5,360
    575
    113

    Agreed.

    A couple of weeks ago, on my regular commute to work on the interstate, I passed a middle aged man with a newspaper spread across his steering wheel reading to his hearts content, at 70 mph.
     
  14. jgoertz

    jgoertz New Member

    497
    0
    0
    All the above is quite common on the Ponchartrain Causeway, a boring 24 mile straight bridge in New Orleans. Men and women reading material draped on the steering wheel, women doing make-up and doing the morning hair-do in the rear view mirror. There is a stiff fine for doing all that, and in the days before cell phones a lot of people would have CB's in their vehicles and call the cops who monitored channel 12. Alas, C.B. use has declined with the increase of cell phone use. It's not as convenient to call the cops now. It was nice to be able to pick up the handset and talk directly to the cops (their were always 2-3 on the bridge. I was considering painting "kill" markings on my vehicle for all the DUI's and other dangerous drivers I turned in.
     
  15. Overkill0084

    Overkill0084 Active Member

    4,910
    2
    38
    Ride a motorcycle. People are scary enough without the added distraction of a phone.
    IMHO, the scariest thing on the road is a woman in a Tahoe with the cutesy stick figure family decal on the back, blathering into her phone.

    I hope no one minds if I piggy back on the original pet peave:
    Most cars since around 2008 or so have Bluetooth built in. Would asking people to actually use it, be too much to ask?
    The only time my phone leaves my pocket when I'm driving a cage is when it's plugged in to charge..inside the center console.
    What's that you say? You don't have Bluetooth in your older car? Sorry, still no excuse.
    A few years back I bought my wife a Bluetooth speaker similar to this: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=854010&is=REG&Q=&A=details

    [​IMG]

    They work great & they ain't that expensive.
    Bonus: You can take it with you when you travel so you can still be safe in whatever rental car you get, without learning a new Bluetooth setup every time.
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2013
  16. Fred_G

    Fred_G Active Member

    448
    28
    28
    I don't talk on my phone when driving, I just can't do it. I agree people on phones are dangerous drivers, but do we really need the gubment to legislate every behavior? Don't we already have laws about failure to maintain controll/reckless driving? And don't get me wrong, if you have a wreck because you were on a phone or distracted, you should be punished.

    But, passing a law punishing someone for having the 'potential' to hurt or be a danger is not right. In a way, it is similar to some of the anti gun people. Need to get rid of guns because of the potential. And CCL will make the US like the Wild West, shootouts every day...

    Don't mean to be argumentative, but you can't legislate common sense.
     
  17. Fred_G

    Fred_G Active Member

    448
    28
    28
    Pretty nifty device there. Will look into getting one of those. My car has blue toof, but that is not compatible with blue tooth. :D
     
  18. dragunovsks

    dragunovsks New Member

    2,310
    0
    0
    I use a bluetooth headset when driving. I see alot of idiots playing with thier phones while driving and the amount of closecalls I see is mindboggling.

    Its now a requirement here in Indiana that if you are driving a tractor trailer you have to use a handsfree device. Fines for being caught on a phone without one are $2700 fine for the driver and up to a $10,000 fine for the company which they drive. Thats a first time offense.

    Ive never heard of anyone getting caught and being fired that severly tho. We did have a driver at my company that received a $100 fine and was told if he bought a handsfree device and took it to court along with the receipt that they would dismiss his ticket.

    Id also like to say I also see alot of stupid crap done by motorcyclists as well. When Im running 60 mph done the road in an 18-wheeler and a guy on a bike cuts in front of me so close I actually cant see the guy on the bike because of the hood of the truck, thats stupid. Thats a motorcyclist with a deathwish.
     
  19. Axxe55

    Axxe55 The Apocalypse Is Coming.....

    7
    2
    0
    what is so humorous about many states passing laws to punish drivers who either use their phone while driving or text while driving is that many states already had a law in place. anything that impedes your ability to safely operate a vehicle is illegal. this doesn't matter if it's alcohol, drugs, or kids being disciplined in the vehicle from the driver. if it disrupts your ability to operate a motor vehicle safely, it's illegal.

    all they did was pass another law that is ineffective and won't be enforced any more than the ones they already have in place. so IMO, passing the new laws about cell phone usage while driving is nothing more than about making revenue for the states, and nothing about stopping a dangerous activity while driving.
     
  20. TekGreg

    TekGreg Lifetime Supporting Member Lifetime Supporter

    2,000
    0
    0
    Absolutely correct! The only credence I give to a new law is it takes the offense from the generic (unsafe operation of a vehicle) and specifies exactly what the offense is. This makes it harder for a good attorney to get it thrown out and also defines for LEOs EXACTLY what they are to look for and enforce. It also clarifies to the public the exact danger, offense, penalty and how to avoid being cited. The local news will often broadcast new laws being passed, but say nothing of a clarification or expansion of an existing law. "News at 5 - A new law will cost you $700 if you phone home!"

    Being a safety issue, it is important to work with LEOs and tell those in charge what you expect as a citizen. Should that not be effective, a citizen can take their case to a higher authority. In California, it is illegal to transport a pet (mainly dog) in the bed of a pickup without a camper shell to protect it or being secured by a short lead. After this law was passed, the ASPCA monitored law enforcement by following and filming officers that were riding behind offenders and not enforcing it. The ASPCA asked local police chiefs to enforce the code multiple times to no avail. The ASPCA finally filed in court with almost three hundred film clips showing law enforcement not doing their job. The judge found the department guilty and slapped a huge fine on them, but suspended it for one year if the police would start enforcing the law. Police changed their attitude, started enforcing it and the city never wound up paying the fine.

    This is the exact same scenario that would work for Bluetooth laws. Just setting up a camera on a corner could catch offenses like this and LEOs enforcing it. The ASPCA example was extreme in that there was NO enforcement, exactly 0%. As long as LEOs do their best when they can, word will get around even if they only stop 15% of what they see and more and more people will use Bluetooth, causing everyone to drive more safely. I hate making more and more laws, but sometimes it's necessary to emphasize and define it.