Joined
·
198 Posts
With all the criticism especially in the media over talk of armed security in and around schools, it got me looking at other sectors where armed security is being used perfectly successfully...
Here we have an excellent example of armed security, in this case at sea,
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/pirat...ime-security-business-booms/story?id=16352840
Now on the other hand, this is what happens when you use a British "security"
rolleyes
company that advertises "non-lethal" "security solutions" . You couldn't make it up, honestly. The pirates literally jump straight onto the ship and the "security guards" all jump off!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...mp-ship-to-escape-somali-pirates-1040257.html
Some interesting reading here,
http://www.somaliareport.com/index.php/post/3380/The_Rise_of_Private_Maritime_Security_Companies
Notice paragraph four, the bit over the media being the first to point out if/when armed security may eventually be unsuccessful. I can't see it happening but aint that the truth, the media will be all over it then
.
Here contains some examples of the hand wringing bet wetter idiot attitudes towards the use of armed security, even though it has proven itself successful and with absolute minimal loss of life and injuries.
http://thenonstateunlimited.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/pirates-vs-private-security/
What do you think guys...
This is how it should be, plain and simple common sense measures...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVnpY8HhTwU
Here we have an excellent example of armed security, in this case at sea,
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/pirat...ime-security-business-booms/story?id=16352840
In fact, since June, there has not been one successful pirate attack in the waters off East Africa, marking the longest stretch of peaceful transit through the region since piracy began to mount a decade ago .
The reasons, according to observers, are the increased presence of international naval vessels -- and the stepped-up use of armed guards, who have successfully rebuffed every attack launched against them.
"To date," said Assistant Secretary of State Andrew Shapiro, "not a single ship with privately contracted armed security personnel aboard has been pirated. Not one."
Now on the other hand, this is what happens when you use a British "security"
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...mp-ship-to-escape-somali-pirates-1040257.html
Some interesting reading here,
http://www.somaliareport.com/index.php/post/3380/The_Rise_of_Private_Maritime_Security_Companies
Notice paragraph four, the bit over the media being the first to point out if/when armed security may eventually be unsuccessful. I can't see it happening but aint that the truth, the media will be all over it then
Here contains some examples of the hand wringing bet wetter idiot attitudes towards the use of armed security, even though it has proven itself successful and with absolute minimal loss of life and injuries.
http://thenonstateunlimited.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/pirates-vs-private-security/
What do you think guys...
This is how it should be, plain and simple common sense measures...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVnpY8HhTwU