Low threat threshold

Discussion in 'The Club House' started by txpossum, Apr 17, 2013.

  1. txpossum

    txpossum New Member

    1,638
    0
    0
    There's a saying about when the only tool you have is a hammer every problem looks like a nail. I've seen a few posts on this forum about folks shuckin' iron in response to perceived threats that to me seemed a little premature. I don't assume that every strange face I see in my neighborhood or every bump in the night requires an armed response. Don't get me wrong, I usually have a weapon handy, but I don't assume one is called for without some more substantial indication of a threat. Any time a weapon is drawn or shown the situation can escalate unnecessarily.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. Axxe55

    Axxe55 The Apocalypse Is Coming.....

    7
    1
    0
    i agree. i believe that bringing a firearm into the equation is the last resort when all other options have been exhausted.

    now if a BG breaks into my home in the middle of the night, then the firearm is my last resort as the other options didn't work, such as the barking dogs and the locked doors!
     

  3. bigbomar4

    bigbomar4 New Member

    453
    0
    0
    Unknow people walking around outside= investigate further. Unknow people in the house in the middle of the night with the door kicked in=boom
     
  4. 95sniper

    95sniper New Member

    820
    0
    0
    ^^^ simply put^^^
     
  5. locutus

    locutus Well-Known Member Supporter

    16,381
    224
    63

    Agreed. Lethal force is the last step in the progression.
     
  6. c3shooter

    c3shooter Administrator Staff Member

    21,328
    171
    63
    You are correct, sir. Under most circumstances, it should stay right there in the holster. Under some circumstances, that holster may be unsnapped. But present a firearm without just cause, you may be about to learn the legal definition of Brandishing a Firearm.

    Or at least learning the penalty for Stupid in a Smart Zone.