Legal to sell Kevlar?

Discussion in 'The Club House' started by marlin-owner, Jul 24, 2012.

  1. marlin-owner

    marlin-owner New Member

    116
    0
    0
    I have a level 3 Kevlar helmet and I was wondering if it was legal to sell it as a private owner? It says advanced combat helmet under the left ear. And under that it says advanced defense system with some numbers. It was issued to a friend of mine and he gave me his whole military uniform including a bit of Kevlar. Is it legal in the state of Arizona to sell??? Or even to have.:confused:
     
  2. winds-of-change

    winds-of-change The Balota's Staff Member

    29,528
    526
    113
    i'm not sure but I believe it is government property and you might not legally be able to own it.
     

  3. marlin-owner

    marlin-owner New Member

    116
    0
    0
    How would I find out if it is legal?
     
  4. Marlinman

    Marlinman New Member

    11,010
    0
    0
    It isn't legal if he didn't give you the paperwork showing that the said helm was discharged form the service.
     
  5. marlin-owner

    marlin-owner New Member

    116
    0
    0
    Gay. How do I do the right thing and not get screwed for it?
     
  6. marlin-owner

    marlin-owner New Member

    116
    0
    0
    I get that there should be paper work but the helmet was issued to him and he left with it. Does anyone else think if it was not discharged they would have shown up to take it back? The cerial numbers were issued to him. If it was missing they would know the numbers and taken it back? Am I over analyzing this? It just wouldn't make sense if it was not discharged they would show up and take it back. Or is that one way they like to take your rights away? It just doesn't make sense to me.
     
  7. c3shooter

    c3shooter Administrator Staff Member

    21,454
    590
    113
    (sound of referee whistle)

    OK- some of you are using auto correct that is messing up. The rest of you may be posting while drunk.

    Service members are issued items of clothing. In general, when they leave the service, they may keep those.

    They are also issued items of EQUIPMENT. Stuff that belongs to the govt. The service member does NOT own the radio, rifle, binoculars, rucksack, canteen- or helmet. When they are no longer using it, the govt wants it back.

    While there is no broad Federal law against selling armor and helmets (in the US- export is another matter) you may not sell or give away what you do not own. And those helmets are not cheap.
     
  8. JeeperSC

    JeeperSC New Member

    120
    0
    0
    If I were you I'd call the Military Police from his base and inform them. It pay not have been his to give away.
     
  9. Flat Tire

    Flat Tire New Member

    1,905
    0
    0
    I would call your friend that gave it to you. If there are any numbers that can be traced back to your friend then give it back to him and let him deal with it. Why not just keep the stuff.
     
  10. robocop10mm

    robocop10mm Lifetime Supporting Member Lifetime Supporter

    11,380
    2
    0
    The current crop of helmets are not Kevlar, they are Spectra shield. Not illegal to own or sell, but if still gov't property could cause some problems. VERY illegal to export.
     
  11. ktmboyz

    ktmboyz New Member

    1,207
    0
    0
    They are all over ebay for sale. I assume the same thing.
     
  12. marlin-owner

    marlin-owner New Member

    116
    0
    0
    I'm just gonna keep the stuff. Thanks guys
     
  13. marlin-owner

    marlin-owner New Member

    116
    0
    0
    Idk if it's the same. I found out its the gold shield and it's got the contract number in it. I would like to keep it. But I don't know yet. It would be handy to have when the Russians arrive but that's a whole different subject I believe in... Thanks guys
     
  14. Mosin

    Mosin Well-Known Member

    7,450
    357
    83
    I have no link but remember reading an article of government officials coming to people's homes and confiscating government issued body armor purchased over the Internet. Apparently it's something they do. The article mentioned that no charges were filed, but the government did take their property back.