Kansas Uses 10th Amendment; Draws Warning Shot from AG Holder

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by BigByrd47119, May 3, 2013.

  1. BigByrd47119

    BigByrd47119 New Member

    3,426
    0
    0
    Pretty interesting series of events may be on the horizon.

    http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.co...s-in-letter-on-gun-control-nullification-law/

    There is more to read that the link above this quote.

    I would encourage everyone willing to write the legislator and governor of Kansas and tell them we are watching and support their push for the Second Amendment legislation. Everyone likes knowing they are supported in their endevors, so I wouldnt worry if your not from the state if you do want to write them.

    Brighter days are ahead in Kansas for the Second AND Tenth Amendments.

    *Thanks to the Tenth Amendment Center for bringing this into the light as no one else is reporting on it*

    **MODS: Feel free to move this if it takes a political turn unfitting for this forum (i.e. more about nullification than 2A**
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2013
  2. BigByrd47119

    BigByrd47119 New Member

    3,426
    0
    0
    I should have been clearer, the link in the original post will ahow the letter sent from Holder. Its a rather serious tongue lashing, although I am surprised Holder has even the most basic understanding of the word unConstitutional...even if he doesnt understand what is or isnt unConstitutional!
     

  3. Axxe55

    Axxe55 The Apocalypse Is Coming.....

    7
    1
    0
    well AG Holder better start writing more of those letters, as other states are pushing for proposals of the same type laws to protect the citizens in their states.

    states are fighting back against Unconstitutional laws.
     
  4. RJMercer

    RJMercer New Member

    519
    0
    0
    It's a good day when Holder gets his panties in a knot. Kudos to the state of Kansas.
     
  5. Garadex

    Garadex New Member

    1,267
    0
    0
    Makes me proud to live in this country but sad to live in Kalifornia.
     
  6. Warrior1256

    Warrior1256 New Member

    614
    0
    0
    What Holder SAYS is constitutional and what IS constitutional could be two very different things.
     
  7. otisthecat

    otisthecat New Member

    456
    0
    0
    I'm no fan of Brownback, but the guy definitely supports the 2A.
     
  8. trip286

    trip286 New Member

    18,658
    1
    0
    Are* two entirely* different things.

    Fixed it :)
     
  9. Axxe55

    Axxe55 The Apocalypse Is Coming.....

    7
    1
    0
    well nobody with any common sense would ever accuse Holder of doing the right thing in regards to the law.
     
  10. alsaqr

    alsaqr Well-Known Member Supporter

    6,127
    113
    63
    Pi$$ on Holder and Janet Reno, the wet nurse who burped him. :mad:
     
  11. kbd512

    kbd512 Well-Known Member Lifetime Supporter

    2,721
    60
    48
    Axxe, I'm not sure anyone with common sense would ever accuse Holder of following the law, much less "doing the right thing".
     
  12. Cattledog

    Cattledog New Member

    1,462
    0
    0

    I would accuse him of that if he tied 300lb test line around is junk and used himself as shark bait. Perfectly legal :D
     
  13. Daoust_Nat

    Daoust_Nat Well-Known Member Supporter

    3,418
    57
    48
    Interesting. Another case of Obama/Holder waving the constitution when it suits them, and ignoring it any other time. Calling it an outdated document that does not have relevence today.
     
  14. jebsca

    jebsca New Member

    228
    0
    0
    I love how this administration will pick and choose what parts of the law they wish to enforce and ignore. They threaten action when states start trying to enforce immigration laws telling us that immigration is a federal law and only they can prosecute. When a state, like Kansas, points out that if the gun is made and kept in Kansas, and never crosses state lines, it is not subject to federal laws, they get all bent out of shape. When gun control bills fall flat, we get to hear about how they held up a bill with technicalities, but they do not point out to us that Harry Reid changed his vote so they could use a technicality to let them bring the same bill up later.

    If the feds push this, I could see it ending up in the Supreme Court. I think Kansas is saying that if the gun is made here and used here, that it is a case of States Rights, and to stay out. As I remember, Montana passed a similar law a few years ago, but I can’t find anything on it. Does anybody remember this too, and if so, what’s the status of it now?
     
  15. Bigcountry02

    Bigcountry02 Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup Supporter

    7,232
    37
    48
  16. Axxe55

    Axxe55 The Apocalypse Is Coming.....

    7
    1
    0
  17. BigByrd47119

    BigByrd47119 New Member

    3,426
    0
    0
    Hope its real. AFAIK, anyone can put anything on that site although I do know I have seen documents I know to be genuine on there.

    The way the letter seems to address some 3rd party (us reading the back and forth between Holder and the Governor) and not Holder makes me suspicious...
     
  18. trip286

    trip286 New Member

    18,658
    1
    0
    I kinda thought that too... We'll see where it goes.
     
  19. BullseyePrecision

    BullseyePrecision New Member

    348
    0
    0
    Makes me glad I live in Kansas.
     
  20. nitestalker

    nitestalker New Member

    6,489
    0
    0