Firearms Talk banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
848 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I've seen some comments on other websites and some people I know that think limiting magazine capacity to 10 rounds would be a good "compromise".

This is a terrible compromise. It is in effect a stealth AWB. While most of the legislation around "Assault Weapons" attacks cosmetic features, magazine capacity actually affect function even if it does not affect lethality.

Go check out www.assaultweapon.info if you have not already. The whole purpose is for gun grabbers to get their foot in the door. No more compromises. If you have not already communicated to your representatives, make it clear that any such compromise is unacceptable.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,482 Posts
It's by design. Once they can "limit" the amount of rounds a magazine can have. They will publicly pat themselves on the back and claim "our streets are safer". Then after the next school shooting, they will claim they need more laws against gun owners, until the shooting public is declawed.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
22,674 Posts
No compromises on basic civil rights.
 

·
Retired
Joined
·
13,624 Posts
Scenario:
Your kid is out in the woods with your dog.
A pack of coyotes comes around.
Do you think 10 rounds in your AR are enough to protect your little one?
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top