Judge upholds CO mag restrictions

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by Cnon, Jun 27, 2014.

  1. mseric

    mseric New Member

    4,171
    0
    0
    Is this now dead in the water or are they going to appeal?
     

  2. locutus

    locutus Well-Known Member Supporter

    16,404
    274
    83
    There are really no grounds for an appeal. It isn't a constitutional issue
     
  3. Cnon

    Cnon Member

    81
    0
    6
    From what I've read on another forum, the sheriff's lawyer says, yes.



    Cnon
     
  4. mseric

    mseric New Member

    4,171
    0
    0
    Please explain?

    Did you read the Judges 50 page Ruling?
     
  5. locutus

    locutus Well-Known Member Supporter

    16,404
    274
    83

    The 2A doesn't really address magazine capacity.
     
  6. locutus

    locutus Well-Known Member Supporter

    16,404
    274
    83
    There's also the issue of standing. To have STANDING, you must be harmed by a law.

    15 years ago, I wanted to sue under the 1A because my city council passed an ordnance that political yards signs could not be out up more than 30 days before an election.

    I had to defy the law, put up a sign, then call the police and ask them to come out and give me a citation. When the citation was issued, I had been injured, and therefore had standing. I sued, and I WON! The ordnance was struck down by the court.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2014
  7. Sniper03

    Sniper03 Supporting Member Supporter

    7,667
    67
    48
    Marcia S Krieger is a Democrat a Liberal and obviously in the Obama anti-gun Camp!
    Impartial ruling? What is that! She wouldn't know!
    Still need to attack the ruling! And go back after them! Some people are getting real tired of these liberal Democratic judges meddling with the US Citizens Second Amendment and our Constitutional Rights. Magazine capacity has nothing hardly to do with the rounds fired. There have been tests even using a revolver where 30 plus rounds were fired from the wheel gun in 1 minute. That is one round evey two seconds. These people are just wanting to attack the Second Amendment.

    03
     
  8. alsaqr

    alsaqr Well-Known Member Supporter

    6,128
    114
    63
    So much for the claim that Republican presidents will appoint only pro Second Amendment judges: Junior Bush appointed the lady. :confused:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcia_S._Krieger
     
  9. mseric

    mseric New Member

    4,171
    0
    0
    Did you read all 50 pages of the ruling?
     
  10. locutus

    locutus Well-Known Member Supporter

    16,404
    274
    83
    NO I didn't. Why take the time to read a case that I knew we were going to lose before it went to court????? (regardless of the judge. Any other judge would have thrown it our for lack of standing)

    It's long past time to bring this battle back to the legislative arena where it rightfully belongs.

    For too long, we've depended on judges to go to the bench and clean up the mess "we the people" made at the ballot box.

    Let's start taking responsibility for our own mistakes and clean up our own mess on election day as the FF intended.