Axxe, you blame the attack on Benghazi on the some conspiricy of the government. Do you blame a Bush conspiricy for 9-11, Roosevelt for Pearl Harbor, or Grant for Custer's haircut? Geez folks, stuff happens, it always has and always will. The difference is only in the mind set of the conspiricy theorists. If you want to see the boogey man behind every bush, you will, that doesn't mean he is really there, waiting to get you.
When you put embassies in unstable areas, sometimes you lose people. Was the security ineffective? Hell yes. Our NSA, CIA and other agencies can't see into the future, they allocate resources to the best of their judgements. Sometimes judgements are wrong, in this case, dead wrong. The allocation of security was probably made by some bored bean counter in St. Paul. It is not some sort of conspiricy, it is just that our govenment is not perfect. (as we are reminded here so often)