From Oregon Firearms Federation

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by Mongo, Apr 30, 2010.

  1. Mongo

    Mongo Active Member Supporter

    1,549
    10
    38

    Attached Files:

    • atf.jpg
      atf.jpg
      File size:
      42.6 KB
      Views:
      241
  2. CA357

    CA357 New Member Supporter

    19,847
    3
    0
    Mutha' effin' douches! :mad:
     

  3. pandamonium

    pandamonium New Member

    1,601
    0
    0
    I pray that Mr. Pyles wins his court battle and becomes a very rich man, with luck these gestapo type actions will be outlawed VERY specificly. This is UNREAL and should NEVER happen in America!
     
  4. michigan0626

    michigan0626 New Member

    763
    0
    0
    He just got a payday. Once he gets paid, he should quit work. After that, buy the biggest handgun known to man. And because Oregon is an open carry friendly state, he should open carry the hand cannon on the side walk right in front of his former employer's house.:cool:
     
  5. Dzscubie

    Dzscubie New Member

    2,508
    0
    0
    Not this crap again!!! :mad:

    Look guys, we have hashed this "incident" over in a previous thread, let’s not go there again. We have determined that we have different opinions on this incident and that there is a lot of information missing. We have also found that there are just as many right wing distortions of facts about the incident as left wing distortions, so again I say, let’s just put this puppy to bed as all it will do is raise the blood pressure of some of our members.
     
  6. dunerunner

    dunerunner New Member

    8,411
    3
    0
    My blood pressure has been elevated for two years scubie!! I can't wait for the upcoming elections!
     
  7. spittinfire

    spittinfire New Member Supporter

    9,663
    2
    0
    You can me both!
     
  8. Kimber45

    Kimber45 New Member

    261
    0
    0
    scubie, question, the article was written by . . . "left wing distortions" or "right wing distortions"? Next, you give your location as some where in Texas, according to the song by the same name, so this doesn't really affect you directly as it would someone living in Oregon or Washington, yet. IMHO this needs to be brought up daily on every blog site over and over, again and again until every citizen in the USA has seen it. You don't want to participate, then don't. We need to fight this asinine effort of the police to "control" our thoughts before it does become an issue that affects all United States Citizens.
    Unite, or die.
     
  9. Dzscubie

    Dzscubie New Member

    2,508
    0
    0

    But Kimber you need to fight those fights where there is clearly a wrong by the government or the police. In this incident, as I mentioned above, there is a large amount of information missing for any rational person to make a valid, informed decision on what actually happened. You state "this is an asinine effort of the police to "control" our thoughts before it does become an issue that affects all United States Citizens." but that evaluation is made upon the assumption that all facts of the incident are present to be evaluated, and that is not the case. It just bothers me when people start lambasting the government or police on supposition and innuendo and not facts. I guess it’s the cop in me that people are innocent until the “facts” prove they are guilty. Again there are a lot of facts missing from this incident. I will be the first one to call foul on misuse of authority by the police when the facts support it. The fact that I live in El Paso, Texas I don't believe has anything to do with my opinion and I believe my opinion to be valid wether I live in Texas, Oregon or Washington.
     
  10. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f97/lose-your-job-buy-gun-get-arrested-24581/ I bleve that is the previous thread about this sorry situation. I'm not sure all the relevant facts were presented in the link to the O.F.F. article; perhaps some that were missed will be available in the other thread.

    I followed the other thread when it was made & just read over the OFF article & watched news coverage of the event; i never heard anything that made me think this situation warranted the SWAT team or the involuntary mental exam, at least not on Mr. Pyles.

    I was very disappointed in how the public employees involved handled the situation, HOWEVER if the guy had gone on a shooting spree at his old office, many people would be pointing at his purchases as "indicators" of a mass murderer "arming up" for slaughter. The deal is, his purchases have not (to my current knowledge) been defined as justification for arrest or for confiscation of his property. If such purchases are to be prohibited, they should've been stopped by the standard NCIS processing.

    What would we be saying if this guy had awakened before the phone call & opened fire on shadowy figures in his back yard? Personally, i would feel really bad for him & would be wishing him RIP.

    Not to pick on you personally, but that comment in relation to this fubar'd situation is very ironic. The "facts" acted upon by the state in the apprehension of this citizen were marginal at best, extremely marginal IMO. The state took practically paramilitary actions against a guy based on the say so of his forseeably biased boss/soon-to-be ex-boss; my gosh, what if his mother had called to say he was a bad son or a bedwetter or something. :rolleyes:

    Weren't there some witch trials up in Oregon at one time that relied on similarly flawed evidence? Perhaps we should dunk suspects until they confess, oh wait...
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2010
  11. Kimber45

    Kimber45 New Member

    261
    0
    0
    Lambasting the police? Hmmm, did not the gentlemen in question get his door knocked on by a swat team? Lets see, what else? Was he not detained by the police, driven to a physc hospital and evaluated? Oh I see, because we do not have the lefts side, our mass media reporting on this and because it was written by a "gun group" it must be fallacy? Was there any implied threat? No, or they would not have released him. So what are you trying to say, that the story is all bull crap? Accept it, the police overstepped their authority, detained but did not arrest this gentleman and for what? Hmmm, think long and hard on that one . . . . He LEGALLY BOUGHT FIREARMS! And I might add, to complement his other legally bought & owned firearms. "I guess it’s the cop in me that people are innocent until the “facts” prove they are guilty." Innocent people who have committed no crime are not dragged from their home, their legally bought firearms confiscated, driven to a hospital and forced to undergo a MENTAL evaluation. If this is how you operate please stay the hell out of the Pacific Northwest we do not need any more thought police. I imagine you would defend the seattle cops for stomping on that "suspect" also. It is cops like these that give police departments a bad name.
    Below is a link to an article all LEO's need to read
    Open Letter to American Law Enforcement
     
  12. Dzscubie

    Dzscubie New Member

    2,508
    0
    0
     
  13. Kimber45

    Kimber45 New Member

    261
    0
    0
    Also I can't find how the police knew he had bought three guns in the days prior to this incident. scubie, keep digging for it's plain that others have found this info. All firearms purchased in the state of oregon go through an oregon state police data base for approval. There is an article out there admonishing the oregon state police for misuse of the data base in this case. Next, he was a union shop foreman for the oregon department of transportation, aka odot, which works closely with osp. From all the reading I've done on this my best "guesstimate" is that the info was leaked from one government bureau to another, nothing official mind you because there was NEVER a complaint form filled out against this gentleman with ANY law enforcement agency. He was a shop stewart, he was having conflicts with his immediate boss and was placed on administrative leave until the matter of their dispute was cleared up. PERIOD!
    IMO this comes down to the idea that we try to control, by thought, opinion or concern, United States citizens, to keep them from harming themselves or others. We, the citizens of this country do not need our government or any of it's agencies telling us how to think. We especially must resist this intrusion, this cradle to grave mentality that our government is there to protect us from ourselves, that they know what is best for us and will not allow is to fall down and get a boo boo. If no threat was made, even though his supervisor might have felt intimidate, than no crime was committed! End of discussion!
     
  14. pandamonium

    pandamonium New Member

    1,601
    0
    0
    Scubie, if you look at the attached article in the origional thread about this it states that the Oregon DOT reported the employee to athorities, who then began to "monitor" the "suspect", it was during this period of monitoring that Mr. Pyles purchased his firearms. This just for clarification purposes, no implications intended.
     
  15. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    The man recently had been placed on administrative leave from his job and was "very disgruntled," the news release said.
    ODOT Communications Director Patrick Cooney said there were administrative, personnel matters involved that limited what the department could discuss.
    However, the state agency had reported concerns about the man to law enforcement agencies, who started monitoring him, officials said.
    "We had concerning information regarding a personnel issue and were watching the subject," Jackson County Sheriff Mike Winters said.

    from Police act swiftly after gun purchases | MailTribune.com It was easier to see in the article linked to the previous thread.

    Regarding the difference between being "held" for a mental evaluation & being arrested: I realize there are people who the state feels may be a danger to themselves & others who may need to be strongly encouraged, maybe even forced, to seek psychological assistance, but i DON'T think having a disagreement with your boss or purchasing some legal firearms should be legally supportable justification for such an involuntary psyche evaluation. Had the guy dropped a deuce on his boss's desk & used it to write a death threat to his boss on the window while carrying a recently purchased handgun coated entirely in his own semen, that would necessitate an interview with a psychological professional, IMO.

    I don't need a nanny named Uncle Sam. I don't need someone to tell me to wear a seatbelt. I don't need someone to tell me how many firearms i should purchase or not to bitch at my boss. I don't need the cops to stop by & rattle my doorknob at 3AM or to tuck me in at 11PM. I don't think this guy needed an encounter with the swatters to let him know that he doesn't really have any rights (4th amendment for example) unless the State wants him to have rights. I SERIOUSLY doubt this encounter will bring about a greater degree of cooperation with LEOs in this individual's future.

    I hope he uses some of his well-deserved suit proceeds or settlement to buy a crapload of firearms & three craploads of ammunition & some exterior night vision cameras for his home to alert him to any future illegal assaults. In My Opinion, every supervising officer involved needs to be retrained, the ODOT supervisor who involved law enforcement in a personnel matter needs to be retrained or repositioned, and Mr. Pyles needs to be very well compensated for the State's virtual rape of his rights via a financial settlement and perhaps a permanent exemption from state taxes.
     
  16. Kimber45

    Kimber45 New Member

    261
    0
    0
    Great post.
     
  17. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    You know what they say about opinions. That was mine. I can't say that other opinions are absolutely wrong, but i may need some convincing or some tasty tasty Koolaid.

    Thanks for the vote of sanity. :)
     
  18. Kimber45

    Kimber45 New Member

    261
    0
    0
    Apology

    Gentlemen, if I've stepped on any ones toes here I'd like to apologize. Some times I get a wee bit too aggressive with my opinion.
     
  19. KalashnikovJosh

    KalashnikovJosh New Member

    1,156
    0
    0
    +1.

    This situation is yet another example of what happens when we let government step past its Constitutionally proscribed lawful limitations and define its own role in our lives.
    And yet another reason why having to beg government for permission to excersize our God-given inalienable right to arms via a background check for every purchase is really not a good thing......because then they know who has the guns,and thats not what the founders had in mind when they wrote the Second Amendment.
    If tyrants know who has guns,it makes their evil just that much easier to accomplish.

    "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
    Thomas Jefferson

    But....But....Dont you know?
    The 'background checks' keep guns out of the hands of criminals?

    Yeah,right.
    And if you believe that,I have some nice beach front property on the Moon you might be interested in.

    But hey,nanny is here to 'help',with their para-military raid teams,nanny knows best;they 'need to know' and 'need to control' who has guns,and if they think you need their 'help'-you'll accept that 'help'-or die.
     
    Last edited: May 13, 2010
  20. robocop10mm

    robocop10mm Lifetime Supporting Member Lifetime Supporter

    11,380
    1
    0
    We all get emotionally involved in certain topics. There are several veteran LE members who can help put some of these situations into perspective (if you are willing to gain perspective).