Firearms Talk banner

1 - 20 of 20 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
286 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Fred Thompson’s Anti-Gun Senate Record


Full details at http://conservativesagainstfred.wordpress.com/2007/06/11/fred-thompsons-anti-gun-senate-record/

The Conservatives Against Fred Thompson volunteers have compiled a list of proposals supported by Fred Dalton Thompson in the senate that include Gun Bans, confiscations and limitations to the free speech of Gun Rights Advocates. Dates and bill numbers are provided so this information can be easily verified. Summary:

1. Anti-gun terror bill (S. 735 )
2. Anti-gun terror bill — final passage
3. Taggants in gunpowder
4. Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation gun ban
5. Free Speech restrictions
6. Smith “Anti-Brady” Amendment
7. Anti-gun Clinton judge appointment
8. Anti-gun Surgeon General
9. Ending the filibuster of a major anti-gun crime bill
10. Young adult gun ban
11. Adopting the “Gun Control Lite” strategy
12. McCain’s Incumbent Protection (2000 version)
13. Incumbent Protection (2002 failed filibuster)
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,215 Posts
Nice find. I was always curious on Thompson's 2nd Amendment stance since he never addressed it in any of his speeches.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
413 Posts
Don't forget his voting record on illegals.

One way and one way only. Abide by the Constitution. Ron Paul is the ONLY one whose voting record proves he belongs in the Oval Office.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
426 Posts
BS Detector going off

:eek: Hillary thanks the whining from the gun crowd for continued attacks on Republican Candidates !

IF you don't want the Clintons BACK in the White House, you had better register AND vote in the upcoming election season.

The Republican Candidate MUST be electable by the Voters. Without VOTES from so-called moderates and thinking Democrats, you WILL get a Democrat in the White House.

Ron Pauls positions may be good but he cannot get elected President.

Newt is the brightest...but out.

Either Guliani or Thompson.....We MUST retain the White House or under go another attack on gun ownership and MORE Taxes.

Reagan was correct on the 11th commandment....speak no evil of fellow Republicans !
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
140 Posts
:eek: Hillary thanks the whining from the gun crowd for continued attacks on Republican Candidates !

IF you don't want the Clintons BACK in the White House, you had better register AND vote in the upcoming election season.

The Republican Candidate MUST be electable by the Voters. Without VOTES from so-called moderates and thinking Democrats, you WILL get a Democrat in the White House.

Ron Pauls positions may be good but he cannot get elected President.

Newt is the brightest...but out.

Either Guliani or Thompson.....We MUST retain the White House or under go another attack on gun ownership and MORE Taxes.

Reagan was correct on the 11th commandment....speak no evil of fellow Republicans !
Ron Paul absolutely has a chance, but that chance is out of the window if everyone thinks the way you do.

And yeah, Giuliani is the person we want for president! [sarcasm] He really does stand up for the Constitution.[/sarcasm] Give me a break. He may as well be a Democrat.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
286 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
:eek: Hillary thanks the whining from the gun crowd for continued attacks on Republican Candidates !

IF you don't want the Clintons BACK in the White House, you had better register AND vote in the upcoming election season.

The Republican Candidate MUST be electable by the Voters. Without VOTES from so-called moderates and thinking Democrats, you WILL get a Democrat in the White House.

Ron Pauls positions may be good but he cannot get elected President.

Newt is the brightest...but out.

Either Guliani or Thompson.....We MUST retain the White House or under go another attack on gun ownership and MORE Taxes.

Reagan was correct on the 11th commandment....speak no evil of fellow Republicans !
Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil. The GOP and the DNC are, for all intents and purposes, one and the same. Do some research on the other candidates' records.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
937 Posts
Yup, stand up for a sure loser, and we all lose.

Bill Clinton was elected TWICE, with just 43% of the vote. Why? Because a bunch of whiney republicans who didn't get their way, voted for Perot, on "principle." Perot (from Texas) was a ringer by the Clinton machine, who had no chance to win and disappered between elections. Are we now seeing another conservative Texas ringer by the Clinton machine? I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the Clinton machine is actually supporting Ron Paul.

I'd rather forgive Giuliani for his wayward past, than live under the so******t regime of another Klinton.

The Democrats just love it when we fight among ourselves.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
457 Posts
no chance

Get out of the Ron Paul handbasket and take a good look at Mike Huckabee. Best candidate in the field.

I'm not opposed to Paul because he has no chance; I'm opposed to his stand on the issues. I believe in the Constitution, but I believe in other things too--like common sense.

Other than gun control, many of his other positions might as well come from MoveOn.org. Forget it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
457 Posts
we disagree

To each his own. Hand basket or whatever ya call it.. Ron Paul is the best out of the field.
We disagree there, and that's OK. But I'll tell you this, and you can take it to the bank: If he runs a 3rd-party campaign, he'll put Hillary in the White House, and if she gets to pick a couple of justices for the Supreme Court, you can kiss your guns goodbye.

And I'll tell you something else: if he does run, the Clintons will be funneling money to him through their backers. Remember Perot? Watch and see.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
413 Posts
We disagree there, and that's OK. But I'll tell you this, and you can take it to the bank: If he runs a 3rd-party campaign, he'll put Hillary in the White House, and if she gets to pick a couple of justices for the Supreme Court, you can kiss your guns goodbye.

And I'll tell you something else: if he does run, the Clintons will be funneling money to him through their backers. Remember Perot? Watch and see.
As you stated in the past, we disagree "STRONGLY".
Outside of the best voting record and (yhr only one) abiding buy the Constitution,( his voting record proves it) Just where would you say Mr. Paul is wrong?

I voted for Perot,went to see him talk. He did 'screw' it up. Perhaps on perpose. As far as the Clintons funneling Ron Paul money...well, what does one say to such nonsense? :rolleyes:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
457 Posts
"As you stated in the past, we disagree "STRONGLY".
Outside of the best voting record and (yhr only one) abiding buy the Constitution,( his voting record proves it) Just where would you say Mr. Paul is wrong?"

See new thread.


"I voted for Perot,went to see him talk. He did 'screw' it up. Perhaps on perpose. As far as the Clintons funneling Ron Paul money...well, what does one say to such nonsense?"

A 3rd-party campaign, a la Perot's, would be very much in the Clintons' interest. If you don't think they'd pull a few strings to make that happen, you haven't been paying attention. They have.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
413 Posts
"As you stated in the past, we disagree "STRONGLY".
Outside of the best voting record and (yhr only one) abiding buy the Constitution,( his voting record proves it) Just where would you say Mr. Paul is wrong?"

See new thread.


"I voted for Perot,went to see him talk. He did 'screw' it up. Perhaps on perpose. As far as the Clintons funneling Ron Paul money...well, what does one say to such nonsense?"

A 3rd-party campaign, a la Perot's, would be very much in the Clintons' interest. If you don't think they'd pull a few strings to make that happen, you haven't been paying attention. They have.
Not paying attention, or not pulling "facts" off the wall. Nonsense is the 'key' word. Mr. Paul and the Clintons? You are not paying attention.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
457 Posts
?

Not paying attention, or not pulling "facts" off the wall. Nonsense is the 'key' word. Mr. Paul and the Clintons? You are not paying attention.
So you don't think Hillary is ruthless enough to do it? Or maybe you think she's too dedicated to her "principles"...

The only "principle" to which the Clintons have any allegiance is power. I admit the idea seems far-fetched; but you can bet they're thinking about it.

I look forward to seeing you on the other thread.

(Still don't have my Saiga, BTW, but I'm working on it. Too bad they don't make .22 Saiga clones...)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
413 Posts
So you don't think Hillary is ruthless enough to do it? Or maybe you think she's too dedicated to her "principles"...

I agree.

The only "principle" to which the Clintons have any allegiance is power. I admit the idea seems far-fetched; but you can bet they're thinking about it.

Yes,power and israel.

I look forward to seeing you on the other thread.

Been there.

(Still don't have my Saiga, BTW, but I'm working on it. Too bad they don't make .22 Saiga clones...)
Yup, much cheaper to shoot.
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
Top