Federal bills would repeal DC gun laws

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by bkt, Apr 28, 2010.

  1. bkt

    bkt New Member

    Federal bills would repeal DC gun laws
    by Matthew Cella

    Federal lawmakers Tuesday introduced bills into the House and Senate that would repeal most of the local gun laws in Washington, D.C.

    The bills come less than a week after Democratic leaders withdrew landmark legislation that would have given the District a vote in the House of Representatives because of Republican plans to introduce an amendment similarly aimed at loosening city gun restrictions.

    The bills introduced Tuesday would eliminate gun-registration requirements in the city and prevent the mayor and the D.C. Council from adopting laws prohibiting gun ownership.

    It would also bar city officials from enacting laws that would prohibit guns from being carried in public places (whether concealed or openly brandished), that would diminish the authority of the city's police chief to deny concealed-carry licenses, or that would prohibit city leaders from preventing guns from being taken into city buildings.

    "This looks exactly like the bill that was going to be attached to the [D.C. Voting Rights Act] last week," said Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, the city's nonvoting representative. "It is this revised, over-the-top language that caused us to pull the DCVRA from the House floor schedule in the interest of protecting public safety, both in our neighborhoods and on federal property here."

    Mrs. Norton, a Democrat, also said she had expected renewed assaults on the city's gun laws by National Rifle Association-backed members of Congress.

    The legislation was introduced into the Senate by Sens. John McCain, Arizona Republican, and Jon Tester, Montana Democrat. In the House, the bill was sponsored by Reps. Travis Childers, Mississippi Democrat, and Mark Souder, Indiana Republican.

    The bill cites the high rate of violence in the District, where a 2008 Supreme Court decision overturned a 30-year ban on handguns that was considered among the most stringent gun restrictions in the nation.

    City officials began rewriting the laws immediately after the decision, and a District Court judge last month upheld local laws requiring gun registration and prohibiting assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition feeding devices.

    An NRA spokesman last week said the legislation was necessary because D.C. gun laws remain too restrictive.

    D.C. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty said Tuesday he opposes the newly introduced bill, noting that the homicide rate in the District is at a 40-year low.

    "Any provisions that would permit more guns in the District would be a major step backward for public safety in the nation's capital," he said.

    IGETEVEN New Member

    Horsesh!t!! :mad:


  3. skullcrusher

    skullcrusher New Member

    I wonder how that came to be? :D

    Even the Mayor gets it.
  4. pandamonium

    pandamonium New Member

    Quoted for truth!
  5. Dillinger

    Dillinger New Member

    Murder rates may be at a 40 year low, but what if they could go lower by allowing the citizens to protect themselves?

    How many lives are justified as long as the rate doesn't go above the "40 year low"?

    How many innocent civilians are you willing to bury to keep guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens Adrian? You putz! :mad:

    Didn't Kumar get mugged in DC last week? And he lost a phone provided by the Obama Administration so now the FBI is involved?

    Yeah, you got a LOCK on "Safe City of the Year" there Adrian.

    Toolbag! :mad::mad:
  6. bkt

    bkt New Member

    A year after the Heller decision, the crime rate dropped 25% in D.C. and it is now the lowest it has been in 40 years. This makes perfect sense for anyone with a brain. Mayor Fenty apparently does not have one.

    Tightening gun restrictions prevents law-abiding citizens from acquiring the means to defend themselves and does nothing to deny criminals access to firearms. Loosening gun control restrictions permits law-abiding citizens to defend themselves and does not make it any easier for criminals to acquire firearms. Law-abiding citizens do not turn into criminals once they take possession of a firearm. These are very simple concepts that gun-control advocates lack the intellectual capacity to grasp.

    Link: » More Guns, Less Crime - Big Government
  7. michigan0626

    michigan0626 New Member

    great article by John Lott. He had written a couple of books, and tons of scholarly articles PROVING that when more citizens have and carry guns, the more crime goes down. i just wrote an english paper for college. it was about how more guns mean less crime and i used him for more than half of my sources. google this guy, read his stuff, and you will have more information to prove OUR (ftf) point of view to all of the hoplophobes.

    hoplophobia- morbid fear of guns
    Fear of guns is a sign of mental and sexual retardation. Frued