Commander in Chief

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by gwk4667, Feb 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. gwk4667

    gwk4667 New Member

    475
    0
    0
    Good Detective Work on Obama

    By
    James H. Illies CPM....

    1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes'. So how can the Obama birth certificate state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used at that time?

    2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is age 25 years old and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa
    Protectorate".
    Wikipedia about this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya_Colony

    3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?

    Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?????

    Please send this to everyone you know with the hope that we can force the media, as well OUR NATION, to address this CORRUPTION.

    "IN GOD WE TRUST"

    I have not checked this out on my own - - - some of you that are good on computers plese check it out! GWK
     
  2. trip286

    trip286 New Member

    18,658
    1
    0
    I'll give you three guesses, and the first two don't count...

    Unfortunately, all this does (assuming it's all true and accurate, which it likely is...) Is confirm what many of us already knew, yet are powerless to do anything about.

    Anytime this subject comes up, it just gets shrugged off and swept under the rug.

    Why are we playing by the rules when the other side isn't?
     

  3. JTJ

    JTJ Well-Known Member Supporter

    9,678
    391
    83
    The whole of the Democratic Party hierarchy would be liable for charges of treason if he was shown to be holding his office illegally and they knew it. Every appointment he made and every document he signed would technically be void. There is no way those rectal orifices will take a fall like that.
     
  4. SSGSF

    SSGSF New Member

    1,160
    2
    0
    Great job bringing this to our attention. The only reason this has never been in the news is because the media is just as liberal as our president. They care more about a president that served in the national Guard during the Vietnam war than a man who was not born in the us. That itself goes against our constitution. But they don't give a **** about that because it is for the greater good, or so that is what they want us to hear.
     
  5. c3shooter

    c3shooter Administrator Staff Member

    21,461
    615
    113
    Gents, sorry, but I am closing this thread. Sir- your post is a political post. For good and sufficent reasons, the Admin of the board limit political posts to supporting members.

    C3
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.