Come to Idaho Oct. 7th

Discussion in 'Hunting Forum' started by Flat Tire, Sep 11, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nwrednk

    nwrednk New Member

    380
    3
    0
    "Shoot, shovel & shut-up"...

    Pop & I have not seen any sign of them where we hunt, but we will not be
    the first victims of them if confronted by a pack! Unlike California, Idaho
    allows us to protect ourselves by carrying a sidearm even when bowhunting!
    And we will not accept "being entered into the food chain" lightly by the
    (eco-nazis) that chose our state for re-introduction rather than California or
    nyc's central park! Last hunting season for wolves was needed BUT, it also
    brought out the worst of "nimrods" that overcrowded every patch of forest
    by camping in the "middle of it all"! Too many non-resident "nimrods" (and) a
    lot of local ones that never hunted a "day in their life", wanted to "be the
    first kid on their block" to kill a wolf! Well, it was such an "overcrowded" &
    unsafe experience in the woods last year that Pop & I forfeted the last day
    of cow elk season (for our safety)! (I wonder if we can be compensated for
    that lost day of hunting)!!!:mad:
     

  2. Flat Tire

    Flat Tire New Member

    1,905
    0
    0
    The Governor of the State of Idaho is going to stop all enforcement for anyone that shoots a wolf. We have almost 900 wolves in the state. Please come to Idaho and help get rid of these animals that should have never been allowed to live here. It has had a horrible effect on our elk and deer populations and we need help.
     
  3. dog2000tj

    dog2000tj New Member

    8,176
    2
    0
    900? In the entire state? My god man, you folks are over run. I fear your state is lost, you should just pack up and move :rolleyes: According to wikipedia - Idaho has an area of 83,642 sq mi. That equates to 1 wolf every 92 sq miles. In case you weren't aware, a square mile is pretty damn big.

    As for never being allowed to live there ... I'm pretty sure the wolves were there first :cool:

    Stay safe
     
  4. Flat Tire

    Flat Tire New Member

    1,905
    0
    0
    One wolf eats 2 deer/elk a month and there are 12 months in a year = 24
    24 x 900= 21,600 deer/elk each year. We used to have a good hunting season in Idaho. Those numbers are generous for the wolf. In the spring the wolves have been knocking the crap out of all the new born deer/elk. Maybe you don't know enough about this subject to be so out spoken.
    The wolves we had here before were smaller than the canadian grey wolf.
    And this animal has had a free for all for to long, its time to remove them completely from the state, and the Butch Otter is trying to make that happen.
     
  5. joshfireart

    joshfireart New Member

    267
    0
    0
    well you would be wrong these wolves were not hear first. the wolves we had where not grays. They where the size of a big dog. I seen one just last week with in 200 yards of the highway and that far from a house a house and 500 yards from a cafe. Every hunter i know wishes that all the wolves lived in VT
     
  6. dog2000tj

    dog2000tj New Member

    8,176
    2
    0
    Well a couple points regarding your post Tire,
    1.the link you provided leads to an article where the wolf population is estimated to be around 850, not 900 as you stated. Why the difference?
    2. You state that wolves eat deer/elk. Which is it that you are using to state your position? Because an elk is roughly 2x the size of a deer. According to info I researched in order to maintain a healthy wolf population a wolf has to eat 7lbs of meat a day. That equates to about 1 deer a month, not 2 as you stated. As you will see it makes a huge difference when coming to a statistical conclusion.
    3. So Lets do the math shall we - in order for a healthy wolf population to survive we have 850 wolves x 7lbs x 365 days = 2,171,750lbs of meat. 850 wolves x 2 deer/elk/wolf x 12 months = 20,400 deer/elk. 20,400 deer x 250lbs(ave weight) = 5,100,000lbs of meat. Based on your data the wolves are consuming more than 2x what they need to survive. The discrepancy is even greater when you factor for a 500lb Elk.

    Tire, I am sorry that you feel the wolf population has become so out of control in your state. But I can't see based on the info you provided how you can draw your conclusions. So the outright slaughter of an animal is not something I am prepared to agree with. If you can provide more factual info I would be pleased to read it.

    And Josh, humans routinely come in contact with wild animals in places you wouldn't likely believe. It's a fact of life, the best you can do is keep your cool, understand what the situation is and protect yourself. But if you feel an animal should be outright slaughtered just because it dampens your hunting season I will have to disagree with you as well. As stated earlier, provide some facts and I will gladly read up on them.

    Again, stay safe
     
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2010
  7. Flat Tire

    Flat Tire New Member

    1,905
    0
    0
    DUDE they kill for fun, you need to do a little research. You are a little out of touch.

    Do a search there are many articles on the subject. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE MAKING A COMMENT ABOUT !! THE BEARS IN YELLOWSTONE DON'T GO INTO HIBERNATION ANY MORE BECAUSE THERE ARE TOO MANY CARCUSES LAYING AROUND. but you like to make a comment from the east coast, please-

    http://missoulian.com/news/local/article_5ff01772-938f-11de-9aca-001cc4c03286.html
     
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2010
  8. dog2000tj

    dog2000tj New Member

    8,176
    2
    0
    Thanks for the article -
    :rolleyes:

    Your first post has discrepancies based on the article you provided. Your second post cited the most extreme case ever recorded. You now have introduced Yellowstone bears into the argument without providing any reference material.

    You've asked me to do a little research, I did. And what I found is that your statements do not add up to the facts that I have found. So I've asked you to provide some info to back up your posts, and you haven't. What you have done is make some off handed comment to suggest that folks from the east coast don't know anything about interactions with wild animals -

    Coyote in suburb attacks caught and killed

    World's 10 worst shark attacks - Telegraph - special emphasis on #2 (it was the events that the movie Jaws was based on)

    Rabid Bobcat Attacks Vermont Family

    So far you haven't won me over, so again i will disagree with the your desire for the wholesale destruction of an animal. I'm an open minded person so keep trying if you like.

    As I've stated before, stay safe :)
     
  9. skullcrusher

    skullcrusher New Member

    10,888
    1
    0
    Now, they kill for fun. Earlier your math was about how many they eat. So, based on what they eat and what they kill for fun, then you should not have any food animals in the whole state. Nevermind that they eat other things than deer and elk. I say kill them all without regard. When they are gone, put signs up at the state line telling the wolves that they are not welcome. That should keep them out and it should also let the deer, elk, bunnies, turkeys and many other varmants know it is safe to move to Idaho. Problem solved.
     
  10. doctherock

    doctherock New Member

    5,132
    1
    0
    Eastern Oregon is having a hell of a problem with the wolves. They love the sheep and young cattle and as stated seem to be killing not so much for the meat but for sport. Farmers are losing alot of stock but find it almost completely whole and un-eaten. They have tracked the wolves, watched them but are not allowed to put them down.
     
  11. Walley

    Walley New Member

    264
    0
    0
    /

    It is surprising what one can learn from the posting on these forums. All my life I have heard that the only animal walking this earth that kills just for the thrill of it is the human and now I have learned that the wolves in the Rockies have taken up human traits. Thank god the wolves in the northern part of this states are evolving slower than the ones out there. Somehow I have a big problem believing this hypotheses as haven been a psychologist for over 40 years I have learned that people quite often prevaricate to justify their positions. We see it in politics and religion every day.

    With 850 wolves running free in a state the size of Idaho it has to be an epidemic that endangers their total population. Ranchers should hire mercenaries to protect their herds. If Blackwater won’t take the job call out the National Guard. Cut the Bull and just admit that those who call for the annihilation of these majestic creatures do it out of fear of the unknown and the urge to kill for killing sake. They manufacture and manipulate statistics in an effort to hide their own personal fears, lust to kill and agendas. My son who ranches in Montana in wolf territory tells me that most of the stories he has heard about wolf depredations are nothing more than campfire tall tales. The elk and deer herds in his area have never been in better shape.

    Before any of you get your panties in a twist let me say this. I am soon to be 73 and have hunted for over 60 years. I have never seen any sense in killing any animal just because it is there and I can kill it. A trophy on the wall is nothing more than an ego builder in my way of looking at things. Hunt for the pleasure of the hunt and if all you get is some perverse pleasure out of killing animals get a job in a slaughterhouse.
     
  12. Fisherking

    Fisherking New Member

    426
    0
    0

    Wolves will also kill for sport I have seen it on the ice of frozen lakes Make a kill and eat the gut and liver and internals and leave the rest. I guss it doesn't go to wast because the cyotes and ravens get them evetualy, but it shure reaks havock on the populations. so to say a wolf only eats 2 elk or deer a month is not taking into acount that they will kill just for the fun of it if oprotunity presents it self.whether it is for fun or teaching its young how to kill, so this greatly increases the mortality rate of the deer and elk.
    F.K.
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2010
  13. Walley

    Walley New Member

    264
    0
    0
    /

    The first part of a kill a predator eats is the guts and they usually come back to the carcass when they get hungry again as long as they feel safe in doing so. Your scent near a kill could be enough to keep them away. People should learn the traits of animals before passing judgment on them.
     
  14. Fisherking

    Fisherking New Member

    426
    0
    0
    I know the caracteristics of wolves Like I said I have seen packs take down deer and either leave it or just eat the guts. I have watched at over a mile away it's easy on the ice. and to take out a few cyotes we set up on these caracses , we have rarely see the wolves come back.
    It sounds to me that the experiance that some people have is National geogphic. They swallow the whole pill of these aganda based showes.
    No offence but till you have lived it it is realy hard to knock it.
    F.K.

    P.S. It used to be that Ministry of Natural Resorses[(SP) my dislexia comes int play again] that wolves didn't atack people but in northern Manatoba 2 of 3 years ago a pack took out a jogger in January, They tried to say it was a bear which are hybernating at that time of year did it, but have now admited it was wolves. There have been other instances as well. So to me this shows that the so called experts have had it wrong. for a while.
    I think mabey they need to be hunted to keep them afraid of humans. We will never extermanate wolves but we will keep a healthy fear of humans in them when they are hunted.
    F.K.
     
  15. Flat Tire

    Flat Tire New Member

    1,905
    0
    0
    It's really simple, if you shoot a wolf you save the life of many deer and elk. The pro life group never understands that theory. They always want to save every wolf and not think the wolf kills for fun, it just doesn't make any sense, you can't have it both ways. By shooting a wolf you become PRO LIFE.
     
  16. Walley

    Walley New Member

    264
    0
    0
    /

    Fisherking

    I have spent quite a bit of time in both Alaska and Canada and seen first hand wolves making a kill. I have also seen them come back to the kill more than once over a period of days. I have also seen predators kill in Africa and guard their kills from scavengers. Yes there have been isolated cases of people getting killed by wolves but bears and other big game have killed far more. I have the good fortune to know a man who studied the pack dynamic of wolves for over twenty years all across North America and I am more inclined to listen to what he has to say than I am others with predetermined views on the subject.
     
  17. Jo da Plumbr

    Jo da Plumbr New Member

    4,492
    0
    0
    So you want to kill all the wolves to save the deer and the elk... so that you can then go out and kill the deer and the elk? Sounds like you are the one killing just for the fun of it.
     
  18. Flat Tire

    Flat Tire New Member

    1,905
    0
    0
    It is called management. Just like growing corn or raising cattle. The State of Idaho should manage their game to be harvested and not let the feds tell them what to do. A lot of people depend on the business of hunters spending money to go hunting. What is so hard to understand ?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.