Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition

Discussion in 'The Club House' started by sculker, Feb 17, 2009.

  1. sculker

    sculker New Member

    247
    0
    0
    :mad:


    Inside the Newsroom: Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition

    By Chris Peck

    Sunday, February 15, 2009

    Misunderstandings with people who carry guns can turn ugly.

    This past week it has been ugly at the newspaper, after passionate gun owners latched onto three very wrong ideas about why The Commercial Appeal's Web site now lists all those in Tennessee who have a permit to carry a concealed weapon.

    -- Wrong idea No. 1: The newspaper is against the Second Amendment that gives Americans the right to keep and bear arms.

    -- Wrong idea No. 2: The newspaper is invading people's privacy by posting the permit-to-carry-guns list on its Web site.

    -- Wrong idea No. 3: Posting the list is empowering criminals.

    The Tennessee Firearms Association and others have fanned the frenzy against our Web site posting of the permit-to-carry list. Pro-gun groups orchestrated a protest campaign that has spread nationwide. By late last week, Commercial Appeal executives were receiving as many as 600 e-mails a day, along with dozens of phone calls at home, at work and on their cell phones. Maps to their houses, with ominous warnings, had been posted online.

    Our crime? Putting up a Web-only database that allows people to search by name or ZIP code for those who have a permit to carry a concealed weapon in Tennessee. The list came from the Tennessee Department of Safety and is available to anyone who wants it, simply by contacting the agency's office. The state of Tennessee, to this point, has decided that the right to carry a concealed weapon comes with the responsibility of agreeing to have a public record of who is packing.

    The newspaper did edit the state's publicly available list. We removed street addresses and birth dates from the information to lessen any chance that somebody might use information on the list for identify theft. As a result, our posted list of permit holders for concealed weapons has less information about individuals than the phone book, your voter registration form or the credit card you use to buy dinner at a restaurant.

    No matter. The posting of this list somehow conjured up deep fears about personal safety, criminals and the media being soft on crime and hard on the Second Amendment.

    This newspaper isn't soft on crime. We know that crime is the No. 1 issue that needs to be addressed in Memphis. We urge public officials to get tough on crime. We back Republican-led efforts to take a hard line on gun crimes and repeat offenders. Only last week we gave prominent coverage to Shelby County Mayor A C Wharton's call for a tougher gun-offender registry in Tennessee. We hope that proposal comes to pass so we can post the names of all who commit gun offenses and the names of all those arrested for carrying a gun without a permit.

    And we're not enabling criminals by posting the list of Tennesseans who have carry permits.

    Think about it for a minute. Many, if not most, households in Memphis possess a firearm. So you don't really need a list to find a house with a gun.

    And, if criminals were checking the permit-to-carry list before picking a target, would they likely choose a house where they know the owner could be carrying a gun, or would they more likely steer away from that house to avoid a possible confrontation?

    Neither logic nor common sense is carrying the day on this issue. It's emotion. After listening to dozens of phone calls, it seems that the issue, for them, boils down to a simple core equation: I have a constitutional right to possess a firearm; any effort to infringe on that right will be opposed.

    For all those who are a notch or two away from a strict black-and-white view of gun rights, there's a powerful case to be made both for a permitting process to carry concealed weapons and for keeping that permitting process public.

    To begin with, the permit-to-carry law helps identify responsible gun owners. If you are a felon, have committed a crime with a gun, have a history of mental problems, etc., you can't get a permit. That's good for society.

    Next, violation of the permit-to-carry law can lead to an arrest. In other words, somebody stopped for a traffic violation or frisked at a bar, who has a gun but no permit, can be busted right there. Another plus.

    Finally, when somebody who has a permit for a concealed weapon messes up with a gun, they lose their right to have that concealed weapon. For example, Harry Raymond "Ray" Coleman, the Cordova man charged recently with shooting a man to death after an argument about whether the dead man's SUV was parked too close to Coleman's vehicle, will lose his permit to carry a concealed weapon. Isn't that the way it should be?

    That's a good segue into why the permit-to-carry list needs to stay public.

    News events like the Feb. 6 shooting at Trinity Commons shopping center led many people to wonder, logically and instantly, who else might be packing a gun. At the point of that shooting, the online list of who is licensed to carry a concealed weapon became a matter of deep public interest. That's why, during the past week, thousands of people looked at the list that had been sitting mostly unnoticed on the Web site for two months.

    A mom might now check the list to see if the parents at her kid's sleep-over next door had a concealed weapon permit. If so, maybe it would be worth talking to them to make sure the gun is locked up.

    A school official, concerned about whether teachers were bringing guns onto school grounds, might check the list to see whether anyone on the staff has a permit to carry, and then have a discussion about it.

    Business people who sell goods and services that might be of interest to those who carry concealed weapons might use the list to generate new leads.

    But there is one overriding, enduring reason the permit-to-carry list needs to be public. Once a concealed weapon is pulled out at a shopping center, a hospital or a business, what happens next with that gun becomes a matter of public concern to everyone.

    That's why commercialappeal.com posted the list. It's a tiny bit of local information, and we're in that business of gathering and distributing local information.

    Granted, news organizations do have some things to learn about this changing media world where print is about stories and online is about data and search. We need to learn how to massage databases more efficiently to tease out particular information, such as how many convicted felons in Shelby County have a concealed weapons permit. (Nine, as it turned out when we did this story back in August 2008.)

    We'll learn. The feedback, flaming and otherwise, from gun owners concerned about this issue has been helpful. But there isn't much room to go back on this mixing of news in print with data online. If it's not The Commercial Appeal doing this, then it will be Google or a hundred Web sites. As more news and information gathering shifts online, local newspapers like this one simply must make sure that those who are searching for information about local communities are directed to newspaper-based information sources. That's why we continue to add databases to our Web site for people to use. We've already got restaurant cleanliness scores, missing IRS refund checks and school test score results. We're working on addresses of sex offenders, real estate transactions and more.

    So can we exhale on this?

    The newspaper isn't anti-gun. We are pro-news and information. That's our job, and we want to do it right.

    Inside the Newsroom: Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition : Columnists : Memphis Commercial Appeal
     
  2. Benning Boy

    Benning Boy New Member

    9,624
    1
    0
    Not being from Tennessee, I can be emotionally detached from this.

    The reasons listed as a case for posting the names of permit holders is less than weak.

    Rather than mom worrying about little Johnny finding a gun at the sleepover, perhaps she should worry about him finding the RX drugs that kids are regularly abusing. Yet I don't see a public disclosure for peoples meds. There's a reason for that.

    If a principal has teachers packing in a school, there may well be a reason for that as well, and it has nothing to do with those who are legally licensed.

    If a newspaper is suggesting that publishing clues to the lifestyle of a private citizen can generate sales leads, and that's a good thing, why not pry into all the other facets of their lives, and publish those as well? For the sake of sales. Isn't that why advertisers pay the papers in the first place?
     

  3. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    Doh! I guess this is why people called it the "banana appeal" when i lived in Memphis. :rolleyes: There is a difference between "available upon request from the government" and "published in the friggin paper", IMO. Regarding the teacher's packin at public schools in Memphis, i would imagine most of my friends there who survived the public school system would have welcomed an instructor who could command a bit more respect in those classrooms (i'm sure some are quiet and peaceful).
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2009
  4. DonnyKC

    DonnyKC New Member

    202
    0
    0
    In Missouri you need a court order to get a list of ccw holders. maybe Tn should adopt that law
     
  5. CA357

    CA357 New Member Supporter

    19,847
    3
    0
    I call bull****.
     
  6. biff44

    biff44 New Member

    46
    0
    0
    Moonbats on the march!
     
  7. hillbilly68

    hillbilly68 New Member

    994
    0
    0
    Reasons for publishing are total KRAP. This was done as a jab at the CCW holders and 2A rights. Why would anyone else need to know? They don't. This is an unvarnished attempt to stick it to the legally licensed carriers. You could make the same argument that we all need to know the credit scores of our neighbors. It makes no sense. But the actions of these types usually don't.
     
  8. Bighead

    Bighead New Member

    643
    0
    0
    People should quit calling and emailing the paper and starting calling and emailing the Tennessee legislature to include privacy provisions in the concealed carry permit statutes.
     
  9. dunerunner

    dunerunner New Member

    8,411
    3
    0
    I guess that after the list is published there is no reason to carry concealed. Just strap that shooter on and let everyone know you're armed. Might as well sling that AR over your shoulder as well. The legislature in Oregon has been hammering the county sheriff to disclose the names of those who have carry permits. So far in this county, he has replied that "...those who have permits requested them for personal security reasons and disclosure would not be prudent."
     
  10. 1861

    1861 New Member

    353
    0
    0
    The commercial appeal is just another so soci alist t rag.
     
  11. bkt

    bkt New Member

    6,964
    0
    0
    That's a big load of crap. Their reasoning is flawed and meaningless.
     
  12. Benning Boy

    Benning Boy New Member

    9,624
    1
    0
    This is an excellent point. Since the secret is out, why not OC to erase any doubt?
     
  13. freefall

    freefall New Member

    2,325
    3
    0
    I say post names and addresses of editors and reporters, heck take out ads, and say "these people have no guns! Home invaders take note!"
     
  14. Benning Boy

    Benning Boy New Member

    9,624
    1
    0
    And this is another excellent point. Publish, instead, a list of people WITHOUT permits.
     
  15. Wenonah

    Wenonah New Member

    43
    0
    0
    To the Commercial Appeal I say, "Just because you can doesn't mean you should." While I would agree that it is completely appropriate to do a story about the law, point out that the information is available to the public and even to tell readers how to acquire the list, publishing the list put them outside their journalistic responsibility and borders on an invasion of privacy.

    Journalists, in the interest of privacy, routinely withhold the identity of victims of crime. Additionally, there are reams of information that is available publicly that no newspaper would consider publishing. For instance while it may be appropriate to name the person who owns a building where the town's first strip bar just opened, it would be considered irrelevant and irresponsible to publish a list of who owns every property in town.

    While the Tennessee state legislature feels that the names of those who hold a concealed firearms permit should be available to anyone who requests the information, a view I disagree with, most people are not sufficiently interested to go to the trouble of researching. By publishing the list, the Commercial Appeal has given those too lazy to do their own thinking or research something to stew upon. I can think of no legitimate reason to publish this list unless they are simply trying to stir the pot.
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2011
  16. danf_fl

    danf_fl Retired Supporter

    12,369
    57
    48
    And no reason to post on an old thread unless one is simply trying to stir the pot. :)

    Now if you want to start a new one....
     
  17. Wenonah

    Wenonah New Member

    43
    0
    0
    Excellent point except that I hadn't noticed how old the thread is. I was simply browsing forums and realized that some points that occurred to me hadn't been mentioned.
     
  18. Benning Boy

    Benning Boy New Member

    9,624
    1
    0
    Night of the Living Thread 2: Dawn of the Thread....
     

    Attached Files:

  19. steve666

    steve666 New Member

    627
    0
    0
    [​IMG]
    Glad I'm from Indiana. When the media here tried that the legislature stopped them.