California Democrat proposes mandatory gun registration

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by opaww, Apr 8, 2010.

  1. opaww

    opaww New Member

    california people get ready, buy more ammo

    California Democrat proposes mandatory gun registration - Taking Liberties - CBS News

    Posted by Declan McCullagh

    A California Democrat is proposing a new law requiring residents to register their shotguns and rifles or go to jail, has learned.

    Assemblyman Mike Feuer, whose district includes Beverly Hill and West Hollywood, this week introduced legislation ordering law enforcement to "permanently keep" records of anyone who buys a gun from a dealer or an individual. California already stores information about handgun purchases.

    Feuer is no friend of firearms owners: his previous legislative effort, which Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into law, required all new handguns to include "microstamping" technology that can imprint serial numbers on spent ammunition casings. As a Los Angeles city councilman, Feuer proposed limiting city residents to one gun a month.

    Feuer spokeswoman Arianna Smith declined to answer questions about the bill on Tuesday afternoon, saying the staff member involved was in a meeting and not immediately available.

    The proposal comes as the U.S. Supreme Court is considering a landmark civil rights case, McDonald v. Chicago, which will decide whether Second Amendment rights in the federal constitution trump state anti-gun laws. But California is proposing mandatory registration -- and not a flat ban, as Washington, D.C. once tried and the justices rejected -- and even legal scholars specializing in this area disagree about whether registration is constitutional.

    "Even though the constitutionality of such a measure is a close call, it is a horrible public policy choice," says Gene Hoffman, chairman of the CalGuns Foundation. "Just as Canada is about to do away with their long gun registry after squandering $1 billion, California wishes to attack law abiding gun owners for firearms not used in crime."

    A CBC News article last month reported that the Canadian parliament is backing away from the nation's gun registry, which was enacted in 1989 and has now come under fire by critics who call it a billion-dollar boondoggle.

    Feuer's bill isn't exactly a surprise: He told the Brady Campaign, an anti-gun advocacy group, earlier this year that his forthcoming proposal would give law enforcement another tool to track down people in possession of illegal firearms. "This legislation will close a glaring loophole and ensure that all firearm records, not just handgun records, are maintained for law enforcement purposes," Ellen Boneparth, spokesperson for the California Brady Campaign Chapters, said in a statement at the time.

    Feuer appears to have adopted an unusual approach to introducing his mandatory registration bill. He took an existing piece of criminal legislation, AB 1810, that dealt with graffiti and vandalism, and replaced it with a completely new version with the same bill number.

    A hearing is scheduled for April 13 in Sacramento before the California State Assembly's Committee on Public Safety.

    At the moment, a minority of states including New York, Maryland, California, New Jersey, and Massachusetts require mandatory registration for handguns. Others, like Pennsylvania, require sales of handguns to go through a dealer, who keeps records of the transaction.

    No federal firearm registry exists, though some anti-gun types have pushed for one in the past. An unsuccessful 1995 bill, H.R. 169, would have imposed California-style registration of handguns nationwide through a "federal handgun registration system." Violations would have been punished by up to 12 years in prison. The author of the bill, Rep. Cardiss Collins, D-Illinois, told her colleagues at the time that "I still believe the best way to control handguns is to ban them outright."
  2. CA357

    CA357 New Member Supporter

    Another leftwing scumbag California politician. :mad:

  3. mrm14

    mrm14 Active Member

    I thought all my shotgune and rifles were registered since the 1980's here in California as I bought them. Is this something new? If their registered once at purchase why is it necessary to do so again? It seems redundant for what is already known. So, your saying I have to register all my long guns again? This just is total nonsense and a waiste of taxpayer money. It is totally known what I own here already in this state.
    Last edited: Apr 9, 2010
  4. Rick1967

    Rick1967 Well-Known Member

    I remember when I was a teenager California was a gun friendly state. Or at least the part I lived in. I can't believe what has happened?
  5. Yunus

    Yunus Active Member

    With California's huge budget surplus it only makes sense that they want to implement an expensive program like this. :rolleyes:

    ALSGUN New Member

    I wonder if all the gang members are going to register thier guns:rolleyes:
  7. crossfire

    crossfire Member

    Sure they will...along with the illegal aliens and the elite that feel they are above the law.
  8. Jo da Plumbr

    Jo da Plumbr New Member

    How is this going to do anything about illegal weapons. No one with an illegal rifle or shotgun is going to show up to register it.

    But the state will probably pass this because they will stick a fee on the process and generate income. The llibs have driven so much of CAs businesses out of the state with their taxation they now have to find ways to nickel and dime the citizens.

    I'll tell you they've driven me out. When I retire I'll be moving to somewhere that my money isn't ripped off by the libs.
  9. NGIB

    NGIB New Member

    Now we know why you're driving all the way to Texas for the meet & greet - it's a pre-retirement scouting trip! Good on ya Jo...
  10. amoroque

    amoroque New Member

    Exactly! gun laws only hurt the law abiding citizen!

    IGETEVEN New Member

    "A California Democrat is proposing a new law requiring residents to register their shotguns and rifles or go to jail"

    Ah...If nobody shows up and does it or participates, can they arrest and jail you all? Will they have to do it in shifts? They do not have enough space in jails now as it is, and I would think the LEO's have more important things to do and have bigger fish to fry, no?

  12. Jpyle

    Jpyle New Member

    A little civil disobediance is a good thing when something like this occurs but what happens when CA declares you a felon for not complying and confiscates all of your guns? Don't have an answer, just throwing that out there as an example of how insidious this type off law can be. You have to wonder what the real endgame is.