Ca 2A advocates deliver 67,000 letters to Gov.

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by peopleofthesun, Oct 5, 2013.

  1. peopleofthesun

    peopleofthesun New Member

    74
    0
    0
    The Firearms Policy Coalition delivers 67,000 letters to Gov. Brown's office asking him to veto all gun control bills. These were the letters generated by the WWW.DemandRights.com site. They will keep printing, faxing and emailing Gov. Brown so share the link.


    http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolaler...s-urge-gov-jerry-brown-to-veto-gun-bills.html


    "With Gov. Jerry Brown days away from deciding the fate of a stack of gun bills, Second Amendment advocates today delivered to the governor's office about 67,000 signed letters imploring him to veto the 14 prospective laws.

    "California already has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation and these 14 measures are particularly onerous," said Craig DeLuz, a legislative advocate for the California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees...."
     
  2. TDS92A

    TDS92A New Member Supporter

    2,747
    0
    0
    This is a good thing!! :D

    Can Jerry Brown read? :confused:
     

  3. nitestalker

    nitestalker New Member

    6,489
    0
    0
    Gov Brown had a small fire while eating his dinner. :rolleyes:
     
  4. peopleofthesun

    peopleofthesun New Member

    74
    0
    0
    LOL. His people have been tracking and studying these bills since they were introduced.



    We hope not..we hope he recycled..
     
  5. 7point62

    7point62 Lifetime Supporting Member Lifetime Supporter

    2,188
    0
    0
    I doubt if 67,000 letters will have much impact on Moonbeam.
     
  6. TDS92A

    TDS92A New Member Supporter

    2,747
    0
    0
    Perhaps not, but any fight against Anti-Freedom douche bags deserves all the support that it can get. ;)

     
  7. JTJ

    JTJ Well-Known Member Supporter

    9,762
    532
    113
    News just announced that Moonbeam vetoed several gun control bills.:)
     
  8. bluez

    bluez Well-Known Member

    1,673
    96
    48
    I am proud ot have signed one of those letters and to have donated to the FPC :)
     
  9. widowmaker

    widowmaker New Member

    624
    1
    0
    Got this in an email a few minutes ago. He just made many thousands of citizens potential criminals.
    We won some but lost some too. I will be moving out of state before July 2014.


    https://www.firearmspolicy.org/the-issues/california/2013-2014/askbrown/



    VETOED
    AB 180 by Assemblymember Rob Bonta (D-Alameda) – Registration and licensing of firearms: City of Oakland. A veto message can be found here.
    AB 169 by Assemblymember Roger Dickinson (D-Sacramento) – Unsafe handguns. A veto message can be found here.
    SB 299 by Senator Mark DeSaulnier (D-Concord) – Firearms: lost or stolen: reports. A veto message can be found here.
    SB 374 by Senator Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) – Firearms: assault weapons. A veto message can be found here.
    SB 475 by Senator Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) – Agricultural District 1-A: firearm sales at the Cow Palace. A veto message can be found here.
    SB 567 by Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara) – Firearms: shotguns. A veto message can be found here.
    SB 755 by Senator Lois Wolk (D-Davis) – Firearms: prohibited persons. A veto message can be found here.

    SIGNED
    AB 48 by Assemblymember Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) – Firearms: large-capacity magazines.
    AB 170 by Assemblymember Steven Bradford (D-Gardena) – Assault weapons and .50 BMG rifles.
    AB 231 by Assemblymember Philip Y. Ting (D-San Francisco) – Firearms: criminal storage.
    AB 500 by Assemblymember Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) – Firearms.
    AB 711 by Assemblymember Anthony Rendon (D-Lakewood) – Hunting: nonlead ammunition. A signing message can be found here.
    AB 1131 by Assemblymember Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) – Firearms.
    SB 683 by Senator Marty Block (D-San Diego) – Firearms: firearm safety certificate.
     
  10. peopleofthesun

    peopleofthesun New Member

    74
    0
    0
    Thank you all who send letters in and donated! We did lose some and beat the worse ones. AB 48 only targets magazine "conversion kits". It does not ban pre-ban magazines. That part was amended out with bill 396 not making the cut.

    Once again thank you all who supported us.

    -Cisco
     
  11. bluez

    bluez Well-Known Member

    1,673
    96
    48
    Keep up the good work!
    Be an activist and an organizer!
     
  12. myers1991

    myers1991 New Member

    69
    0
    0
    I believe a good question to be asking, with rhetoric of course, is how many of these 67,000 people are legal gun owners or supporters and not gang members or anyone that illegally obtains guns? I believe the answer would be 0, zilch!!! If only the stupid libertard legislators and officials could see this we would not be in this debate at all.
     
  13. myers1991

    myers1991 New Member

    69
    0
    0
    Gang members and anyone who illegally obtains guns would be zero of course. Sorry for the confusion.
     
  14. mrm14

    mrm14 Active Member

    2,708
    6
    38
    I thought it did ban pre ban magazines or null the grandfather clause.

    This is what I read for AB 48

    http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB48
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2013
  15. peopleofthesun

    peopleofthesun New Member

    74
    0
    0
    Only if SB 396 became law which it didn't. It didn't even make it to the Gov desk. Here:

    SEC. 3.
    Section 1.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 32310 of the Penal Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 396. It shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, (2) each bill amends Section 32310 of the Penal Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 396, in which case Section 1 of this bill shall not become operative.

    SECTION 1.
    Section 32310 of the Penal Code is amended to read:

    32310.
    (a) Except as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 32400) of this chapter and in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Division 2 of Title 2, commencing January 1, 2000, any person in this state who manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.
    (b) For purposes of this section, “manufacturing” includes both fabricating a magazine and assembling a magazine from a combination of parts, including, but not limited to, the body, spring, follower, and floor plate or end plate, to be a fully functioning large-capacity magazine.

    SEC. 1.5.
    Section 32310 of the Penal Code is amended to read:

    32310.
    (a) Except as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 32400) of this chapter and in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Division 2 of Title 2, any person in this state who manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.

    (b) Except as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 32400) of this chapter and in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Division 2 of Title 2, commencing July 1, 2014, any person in this state who possesses any large-capacity magazine, regardless of the date the magazine was acquired, is guilty of an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100), or is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100), by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.


    Wall of text I know but it is in there.