Firearms Talk banner

Brady's Latest Video: "Assault Clips"

3K views 25 replies 19 participants last post by  Cory2 
#1 ·
#2 ·
It's long past any point in time where either side will ever come to a common understanding. :( As far as I'm concerned I'd like to see a mass ban and confiscation from the Gov't - that would put this issue to rest once and for all. :cool:
 
#3 ·
"Assault Clips"

That sounds like the name of a crappy haircut place.


Do you think that the Brady bunch will share some of what they are smoking?
 
#6 ·
I really hate the lingo there using, honestly assault clips what next anti tank byanets? I'm honestly I really can think of a good reason to have a 32 round clip for my glock, lets see 5 men break into my house it saves a reload that might mean my life. It also mean that five men arent leaving my house, next thing you know there going to call my 22 a assualt rifle and say that it kills baby seals some how.

what a bunch of liberal yuppies, they can't take there head out of there hind quarters long enough to listen to anyone but them selves.
 
#7 · (Edited)
Maybe we could call them "azzhole clips".
 
#8 ·
Is that a joke? Why don't we ban snow plows? It's obvious that people who put a plow on the front of their truck only want to use it to plow through a field of innocent puppies.
 
#11 ·
This, as usual, really has nothing to do with keeping people safe. This is ONLY about CONTROL!! If these socialist/commie sphincter skimmers were concerned about peoples safety they would be more concerned with the fact that convicted murderers get out of prison in just a couple of years. Lautenberg and McCarthy are only after denying citizens of their rights, period.

The sad part is, there are enough dumb-asses out there that will believe whatever the hell they see on the tv and think it is fact, they are the ones who are allowing our rights to be whittled away, and these effers VOTE! It will be interesting to see how they would react if their other rights were infringed upon in the name of keeping people safe.
 
#12 ·
cars are the greatest source of fitalities in the united states, to reduce this i demand that we mandate that all cars can only have 2 gallon tanks :cool:
 
#13 ·
Here's a really serious anti-gunner for you:

Anti-Gun Senator Shoots Intruder

State Senator R.C. Soles (D - NC) Long time Anti-Gun Advocate State Senator R.C. Soles, 74, shot one of two intruders at his home just outside Tabor City, N.C. about 5 p.m. Sunday, the prosecutor for the politician's home county said.

The intruder, Kyle Blackburn, was taken to a South Carolina hospital, but the injuries were not reported to be life-threatening, according to Rex Gore, district attorney for Columbus, Bladen andBrunswick counties.

The State Bureau of Investigation and Columbus County Sheriff's Department are investigating the shooting, Gore said. Soles, who was not arrested,declined to discuss the incident Sunday evening.

"I am not in a position to talk to you," Soles said by telephone.

"I'm right in the middle of an investigation."

The Senator, who has made a career of being against gun ownership for the general public, didn't hesitate to defend himself with his own gun when he believed he was in immediate danger and he was the victim.

In typical hypocritical liberal fashion, the "Do as I say and not as I do" Anti-Gun Activist Lawmaker picked up his gun and took action in what apparently was a self-defense shooting.

Why hypocritical you may ask?

It is because his long legislative record shows that the actions that he took to protect his family, his own response to a dangerous life threatening situation, are actions that he feels ordinary citizens should not have if they were faced with an identical situation.

It has prompted some to ask if the Senator believes his life and personal safety is more valuable than yours or mine.

But, this is to be expected from those who believe they can run our lives, raise our kids, and protect our families better than we can.
 
#14 ·
The Brady Bunch is a passel of misdirected, lazy cowards.

They have no way to deal with the real problems, the unregistered

criminal who owns one gun and five bullets. So they go after

the law-abiding shooter, who jumps through all the hoops to

follow laws in direct violation of our second amendment rights.


They have no system in place to deal with mental defectives

or druggies, and monitoring THEM. Maybe THEY should have to pay the

state to be fingerprinted, and mugshot the way every law-abiding

CCW license holder is.
 
#15 ·
unregistered criminal
The only registered criminals are sex offenders who must register when the move. I am proud to be an unregistered gun owner. I live in a state that recognizes registration solves no crimes and only sets the stage for confiscation. We also required no training, photo, fingerprints to carry a firearm openly, have been that way for 99 years, works well so far. Now you can carry concealed the same way here.

To the original post - stupid ad. I also agree that if Sarah Palin got a black eye for a cross hair over a state photo, these blood dancing opportunists should get a bare knuckle beating for this one. I have MANY magazines that hold over 10 rounds, and not one of them has ever shot a kid, grandpa, graduate or teacher. Whaddya know, Joe...
 
#16 ·
I just can't believe that they think that they can do something by banning high cap mags, I mean hell a bullet will kill someone out of any mag ask the animals I've killed and eaten over the years. I mean hell even with my revolver it only takes me a few seconds to reload. I really need to run my snow plow through a field of puppies right now...
 
#18 ·
I really can't believe that they would attempt to tie those clips to shooting children. It makes me wonder what will happen when the next guy blasts 10-20 people and just reloads quickly while using a ten round magazine.

Not only that, but magazines and parts are *so* easy to get, you will never get rid of them. People can make these things all - day - long.

I wonder what person printed that target for their use lol. That person should be ashamed of themselves.
 
#19 ·
I just can't believe that they think that they can do something by banning high cap mags, I mean hell a bullet will kill someone out of any mag ask the animals I've killed and eaten over the years. I mean hell even with my revolver it only takes me a few seconds to reload. I really need to run my snow plow through a field of puppies right now...


They are not out to ban High Cap Mags. Just Assault Clips. I have never seen 32 round Clips.
 
#22 ·
Is it really that foreign of a concept that the **** in Tucson would still happen, even if we had black powder rifles?
Your telling me anti gun lobby that if 10 rounds was the max, you wouldn't make stupid commercials? That's almost worth banning them right there.

It wouldn't be like that though, that commercial would be the same after 'extended' magazines were outlawed, he would just have to reload twice.
 
#23 ·
Is it really that foreign of a concept that the **** in Tucson would still happen, even if we had black powder rifles?
Your telling me anti gun lobby that if 10 rounds was the max, you wouldn't make stupid commercials? That's almost worth banning them right there.

It wouldn't be like that though, that commercial would be the same after 'extended' magazines were outlawed, he would just have to reload twice.
I think I speak for most of us in stating that if we could secure an IRONCLAD

GUARANTEE that the antis would SHUT UP AND GO AWAY, most of us

would give them half our air supply, let alone hi-cap mags. But they'll

never let up no matter what concessions we make.

Join the NRA. Talk everyone you know who isn't an anti into

joining the NRA.
 
#25 ·
I'm not into clubs.
Well, I hope you are "into" clubs, because if the antis take our guns away,

clubs is all we'll have left.

NRA's not a club, it's our voice in Washington. People who bake up excuses

because they don't don't feel like shelling out 25$ a year for a membership

are a big part of what's keeping the NRA at 1/10th of it's needed

membership strength. Add your voice to everyone else's, and maybe once and

for all Washington will hear, even if they don't want to listen.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top