BLM proposal

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by Mack Bolan, Nov 16, 2011.

  1. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    from the cited article.

    Oh hell no! No more limitations on the bear hunters dangit!

    You know, i would bet that ATV's and joggers and boaters probably do as much if not more damage as recreational shooters.

    BLM - Bullcrap Land Mongers! It isn't "ours" if the feds run it.
     

  2. bkt

    bkt New Member

    6,964
    0
    0
    Whether you're talking land, money or health care, you're damned right!
     
  3. Gordo323

    Gordo323 New Member

    1,086
    0
    0
    Why do we even have a BLM, USFS, USDA etc., etc.!

    Keep feeding the machine, and the bears will make Orangellos fears a nightmare!
     
  4. bkt

    bkt New Member

    6,964
    0
    0
    Exactly! That's the question that should be asked and it's good to see more people asking it!
     
  5. trip286

    trip286 New Member

    18,658
    1
    0
    Where I live at, we have Arkabutla lake and a huge corps of engineers area out there. Several years back, it was the exact opposite of this. ATVers, were banned from the area for causing too much damage. Hunters got almost exclusive use of the area, with the exception of a few recreational hikers. Incidentally, the hunters were now the only ones allowed to use an ATV on that land. They were allowed to use it on that land if the killed game that was too big to haul out by hand. And it was pretty much up to the hunter to decide what was too big and what wasn't.
     
  6. neilage66

    neilage66 New Member

    630
    0
    0
    (suggested by a friend)--->So then suppressors will no longer be NFA regulated so we can avoid *freaking out* urban dwellers who venture out to rural areas? Ok, fine.

    QUICKSAND - GEMTECH

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2011
  7. hiwall

    hiwall Active Member

    4,268
    21
    38
    This year the BLM banned target shooting on 71,000 acres near me.
     
  8. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    Ahhhh Arkabutla; those wind warnings are there for a reason. Do not try to cross that thing in an empty fiberglass canoe; wind can be strong.

    Another story about that lake: Probably seven or eight years ago, they decided to drain the lake down significantly to maintain water levels downstream in the delta (or something along those lines). At that point in time, fishing was greatly impacted and, as i was told, restricted. The officers in charge of the lake were fond of saying that it was a "government asset", or some such crap, and that what the boaters and anglers wanted was not at all important.

    That whole "greater good" thing really depends on who gets to make the call. At one point in time the whims and mismanagement of the federal government was not important in comparison to outside threats to the country's safety. I think nowadays, some people are starting to realize that many of those "outside threats" were caused by the poor strategies and beyond criminal alliances of those same people making the call about "the greater good". Were the vietcong the product of those leftover "allies" against the japanese? Are the AlQueda goobers the result of federal support of the hardcore Islamists and tribalists who were used to keep the Soviets from gaining control over afcrapistan? Who was it that helped train those loser zetas killing all the civies down in mexico? Who was it that backed mostly third-party support for sodamn insane's war on Iran? Who was that back in the 1950's overthrowing the democratically elected government in Iran in favor of a more easily-influenced monarchy to help keep that oil flowing? Who was that back in the late 1980's selling arms to the Islamic Iranian government (the one that replaced the puppet monarchy) to fund a civil war in Nicaragua (allegedly against a drug-funded puppet dictator)? Oh yeah, that was the federal government of these United States of America, mostly through SAD.

    Way to go jerks, just piss away some more of that theoretical American "moral higher ground" and respectability. Oh wait! Maybe you could give some guns to the loser zetas you helped train, so that they can more effectively murder their countrymen. :rolleyes:

    Hell, maybe SAD sold out Detroit to the Muslims to break the greedy UAW; i'm sure they will fess up later when it is too late to do anything about it but ally with the Canadians against a growing domestic Islamist state bent on sovereignty within the confines of {gasp} our precious union. :rolleyes:

    I think the best thing for "the greater good" would be to disolve the ridiculous mess centered in D.C. and start over with stronger limitations on what the feds can mess with. Of course, they haven't really honored the Bill of Rights, so maybe the whole concept of a federal government operating as an agent of its subjects is just fundamentally flawed.
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2011
  9. neilage66

    neilage66 New Member

    630
    0
    0
    Caution: This area is no longer a rant-free zone.

    Your points do not fall on deaf ears Mr Gelatin.
     
  10. Scratchammo

    Scratchammo New Member

    1,490
    0
    0
    Anyone who thinks this administration isn't anti-gun is either blind, deaf, or just plain stupid.
     
  11. gocritter

    gocritter New Member

    65
    0
    0
    What do you think "fast and furious" was all about. Just like Waco, oh dear just look we need some stronger gun laws. Then we have Ruby Ridge. The real farse is the Dog and Pony show the washington scammers have to show the serfs and peons that they have control of the problem.
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2011
  12. widowmaker

    widowmaker New Member

    624
    0
    0
    Maybe its time for some "unintended consequences"?
    Just asking.
     
  13. neilage66

    neilage66 New Member

    630
    0
    0
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  14. dunerunner

    dunerunner New Member

    8,411
    3
    0
    Another armed police force, this time part of the BLM.......Great!! This is unenforcable withoout the BLM creating its own branch of law enforcement.
     
  15. trip286

    trip286 New Member

    18,658
    1
    0
    It could be another job creation farce by obama
     
  16. Millwright

    Millwright New Member

    149
    0
    0
    If "gun nuts" were black, hispanic, female or transgender, we'd be a "recognized minority" ! As it stands, in a nation of 330M, we're probably less than 10 %, yet get no "minority recognition" !

    The way ths change reads - to me - is any none shooting user can shut down any legal shooting sporting use of BLM lands at will without demonstrating any "hazard" ! Since AR-types are known to "push the limits" in any hunting area, this means carefully crafted scientific game management programs are at risk ! Not to mention the revenues various states/residents derive from these activities !

    Ought to be an interesting conflict ! >MW
     
  17. Gordo323

    Gordo323 New Member

    1,086
    0
    0
    Fish Cops, Camping Cops, TSA Cops, etc., etc.!

    Where does it end? Shouldn't these folks be, Border Patrol, City Cops, Highway Patrolmen, Local PD protecting us?

    I have the utmost respect for LEO's that do their job, but do not believe that the Federal Govt. should create their positions without giving me a say in the matter.
     
  18. orangello

    orangello New Member

    19,156
    0
    0
    I really enjoy shooting, but i'm not going THAT far for it. :eek:


    Don't forget the tax cops and the kiddie cops.