Firearms Talk banner
1 - 20 of 64 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
67 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hello, I am looking for an all-around bada** tactical rifle that I can feel confident in. I want something that can reach out and nail a 1000 yd target but also be able to be taken hunting as well. I know I'm looking at polar opposites here, but that's why I came to the gurus of FTF because you often can find me what I want or damn close to it. I already have a few things in mind. Such as building a rifle around the Rem 700 action, or going with a Savage 110 BA. I was looking at the 300 win mag or 338 Lapua (leaning more to the 300) and my price ceiling is about $2500. Help me please?
 

·
Supporting Member
Joined
·
12,631 Posts
Sub

Depending on what you are going to hunt the 300 Win. Mag. would probably be the best choice and also because you mentioned 1000 yard shooting. Although the 308 is a good hunting rifle for most medium sized game and I have shot it at 1000 yards the 300 is superior at that long range. And the 700action is a good action as is others like the Savage 111 action you mentioned. If the $2500 range includes a good quality scope which would be needed for long range shooting you are looking at a rifle package costing in the range of $1500. In order to get a good scope you are looking around the $1000 range give or take a little. Selection of the scopes reticle is also an important decision for the application the rifle will be used for.
Thanks for joining us here on the FTF!

03
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
67 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Sniper03 said:
Sub

Depending on what you are going to hunt the 300 Win. Mag. would probably be the best choice and also because you mentioned 1000 yard shooting. Although the 308 is a good hunting rifle for most medium sized game and I have shot it at 1000 yards the 300 is superior at that long range. And the 700action is a good action as is others like the Savage 111 action you mentioned. If the $2500 range includes a good quality scope which would be needed for long range shooting you are looking at a rifle package costing in the range of $1500. In order to get a good scope you are looking around the $1000 range give or take a little. Selection of the scopes reticle is also an important decision for the application the rifle will be used for.
Thanks for joining us here on the FTF!

03
That price does not include a scope. That is solely the rifle. I was seriously considering the Savage 110BA in 300 Win Mag or more seriously considering building a Remington 700 in 300 Win Mag. Thanks for the help. Any opinions on a good scope? I have looked at Nightforce (which is a bit pricey), Bushnell, Weaver, And Vortex. I'm also interested in Leupold, but don't know what scope would be best.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
14,475 Posts
You will be looking at hauling a 10 lb or more rifle around for hunting. You could spend $600 for a hunting rifle and scope for up to 300 yards and the rest on your tac rifle. A compromise usually does neither job well. A Savage 110 FCP 300WM should run about $900
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,934 Posts
Hello, I am looking for an all-around bada** tactical rifle that I can feel confident in. I want something that can reach out and nail a 1000 yd target but also be able to be taken hunting as well. I know I'm looking at polar opposites here, but that's why I came to the gurus of FTF because you often can find me what I want or damn close to it. I already have a few things in mind. Such as building a rifle around the Rem 700 action, or going with a Savage 110 BA. I was looking at the 300 win mag or 338 Lapua (leaning more to the 300) and my price ceiling is about $2500. Help me please?
Here's some pics of my Remington 700 in .300 Win Mag with a trued action and a 28" barrel. Basically, I bought the cheapest Remington 700 rifle in .300 Win. Mag. they made, harvested the reciever, and threw everything else away.

053.jpg

web[1].jpg

It's a tack driver and I've had it out to 1400 yards at altitude. Probably could take it further at altitude before the bullet goes transonic, but havn't tried yet.

I've got more than $2500.00 into this rifle but I think you could get the
thing done for a tad under $3000.00, less the scope, if you choose different or eliminate a few componets for a build similar to this one.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,934 Posts
You will be looking at hauling a 10 lb or more rifle around for hunting. You could spend $600 for a hunting rifle and scope for up to 300 yards and the rest on your tac rifle. A compromise usually does neither job well. A Savage 110 FCP 300WM should run about $900
That red rifle of mine pictured above weight 17 lbs. 1 oz. with the scope. You can use a lighter contour with a shorter barrel and probably save up to a couple of lbs. or so. Also, you would most lilkely use a different stock than the McMillan A-5 I have on this one. There are better compromise long range / hunting type stocks available and for less $$$ than McMillan. Also, that Premier Reticles 5-25X56mm scope on this rifle weighs 39 oz's. by itself not including the Badger rings which weigh 11 oz's. Alot of weight can be saved here as well with the choice of a lighter scope and rings. Still going to probably be a 12 to 14 lb. rifle. And last but not least, using a TAB Gear biathalon sling makes the weight not much of an issue when lugging a heavy rifle like this around for hours when hunting.

https://www.riflesonly.com/pro-shop/tactical-gear/regular-biathlon-sling-rbs.html

Or you could get a back pack like one of these.

http://eberlestock.com/J34 Just One.htm
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
0 Posts
So Id probably be better off doing 2 rifles? One long range tactical, and one hunting rifle?
though a target rifle and a hunting rifle can be interchanged but, you usually have to settle on a compromise somewhere. for a $1000 or less you could have one very nice hunting rifle and scope that will serve you well and then take the rest and start building a long range target rifle.

shooting at very long distances like a 1000 yards is going to require quality optics and they are not cheap. rule of thumb, you can't hit what you can't see.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
597 Posts
winchester model 70 in 300 win mag with a high powered scope and detachable harris bipod should work for what your saying but your still comparing apples to oranges
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
28 Posts
axxe55 said:
shooting at very long distances like a 1000 yards is going to require quality optics and they are not cheap. rule of thumb, you can't hit what you can't see.
Problem can also be -hitting something you don't see-
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
28 Posts
axxe55 said:
if you don't know what's behind your target at that range, you have no business pulling the trigger in the first place.:rolleyes:

some of us actually believe in the 10 Rules Of Gun Safety.
I was more referring to spotting your own target. That 8 mph breeze can be 5 feet of drift @1000.
That can be a target miss.

When you have a $2500 dollar gun budget I doubt there is $600 extra for the spotting scope
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
21,822 Posts

Attachments

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
14,475 Posts
They still shoot 1000 yards matches with black powder cartridge rifles and iron sights. 45-110 was developed for long range target shooting.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
22,674 Posts
Have you ever shot v000 yard competition???
Do you have a 1000 yard range near by to practice??
Do you handload?

If the answer to any of these is no, you might be better off just getting a really good hunting rifle and quaity scope and shooting 600 yard competition (and hunting) for a while.

The .308 would really shine for this, and ammo (or component)costs wouldn't land you in the poor house.:p
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
67 Posts
Discussion Starter · #19 ·
locutus said:
Have you ever shot v000 yard competition???
Do you have a 1000 yard range near by to practice??
Do you handload?

If the answer to any of these is no, you might be better off just getting a really good hunting rifle and quaity scope and shooting 600 yard competition (and hunting) for a while.

The .308 would really shine for this, and ammo (or component)costs wouldn't land you in the poor house.:p
1. Haven't shot competition, but interested because I have shot it as practice and just challenging my hunting buddies.
2. Nothing official. Just 12 acres of land of nothing but open flat land
3. Yes I reload
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
597 Posts
lets try it this way, wat do u wanna spend on this rifle and wat are u thinking of hunting with this rifle other than people in a tactical situation
 
1 - 20 of 64 Posts
Top