Another One Bites the Dust...

Discussion in 'Legal and Activism' started by mseric, Mar 3, 2014.

  1. mseric

    mseric New Member

    4,171
    0
    0
    Looks like Rhode Island is sliding down the same paths a CT and NY.

    AR bans, Mag limits, Taxes, "May Issue" and Misdemeanors = "Prohibited Person".

    With the Voting Record in RI, the legislators will have little if any opposition in getting these Bills passed. The Citizens of RI like those in CT will get exactly what they voted for.

    http://libertycrier.com/lawmakers-r...il&utm_term=0_600843dec4-0a80e78178-285044409
     
  2. Sniper03

    Sniper03 Supporting Member Supporter

    7,665
    61
    48
    Well looks like we may be adding RI to the off limits to business with list for the company!;)
    I hope all these states go bankrupt! All are violating the Constitution of the United States. And I do not care what the Liberal Judge in Connecticut ruled! His credibility just went to ZERO with the rest of the socialist, liberal, progressive Zealots!

    03
     

  3. danf_fl

    danf_fl Retired Supporter

    12,358
    26
    48
    I didn't think that RI had a firearms problem.
     
  4. mseric

    mseric New Member

    4,171
    0
    0
    Does any State have a "firearms problem"?
     
  5. danf_fl

    danf_fl Retired Supporter

    12,358
    26
    48
    I can see passing a law if there is a problem.
    Otherwise, let sleeping dogs lie.
     
  6. JimRau

    JimRau Well-Known Member Supporter

    5,028
    72
    48
    Considering the fact that the states have no Constitutional authority to pass laws relating to the RTKABA's I find all this very troubling!!!:mad:
    "We the people" have allowed this happen and now we have a real problem!!!!:eek:
     
  7. mseric

    mseric New Member

    4,171
    0
    0
    Really, splain what type of problem you would consider a "good reason" to Ban, Confiscate and Violate the Constitution.
     
  8. texaswoodworker

    texaswoodworker New Member

    10,198
    0
    0
    I think he was saying that he could see them trying to ban something if there was some tragedy or increase in crime, but not if there was no problem.

    I seriously doubt he was supporting gun control.