Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion' started by jestsumguy, Feb 2, 2010.
Which gun would you rather have in battle? Personally I'd go with the AK.
I say AK only for the reason of th M16A1 does not a the chromed chamber and cleaning kit, add that to the little black rifle and it will be in these hands.
Neither. Would rather have a M240B but that is just me. If someone is shooting at me then I want to shoot back but 5 times more ammo. That gives me 5 times more chances to kill that dirty SOB before he kills me.
My theory on battle is blow it up then go in and clean it out after that burn it all to the dam ground. Then and only then is it safe.
hmmm....3 posts, and two of them are polls about choice or arms. This isn't something for Call of Duty again, is it? uhmmm....make mine a MG-42 with unlimited ammo and barrel changes.
Or...I'd call in an airstrike - let the jet jockies/WartHogs/AC130 have at them first, then like Tango said, go in afterwards to finish off whatever is left.
that game is awesome
I dont like the AK in the game too much recoil for me but it is pretty strong
the M16 is burst but its not as accurate as the FAMAS
but if i had to choose between the two i would choose M16
But my favorite is the ACR and the TAR
Nah It can be for Call Of Duty, They don't have the M16A1. They only have the M16A4, Hence the Bursts. As YoungGunWill said, If it was an A2 (I think they had the Chrome Chamber) no doubt. M-16 all the way. but Since it doesn't Sadly Ak-47..
G3A4ZF w/ fixed A3 buttstock.
I was looking for a pic, and found a blogger I had lost track of. Chics' and guns... Hope you understand Spanish! Hell the pics are sweet.
La Guarida del Bigfoot: noviembre 2007
in battle?...neither...make mine a russian gas operated GSh-6-23M 10,000RPM & fires a nasty 23mm round...YUMMY!better make it two of them...incase the 6 little barrels over heat....
here in America: M-16. with all the ARs and .223 ammo everywhere i think it would come down to logistics. anywhere else, AK for the same reasons.
Why? Just curious...
Plains and deserts= AR
Cities, Jungles, forested areas=AK
Perhaps the best compromise might be an AK-74, but I have never owned one of those.
L1A1 SLR (FN FAL)... love em. Or Steyr AUG... coz i know the drills..
Each tool has it's uses.
M4- Anything closer than 100 yds. And it is chrome lined.
Saiga .308- 100 yds. to 400 yds. (technically an AK)..
Mossberg 500- When you run out of rounds for the AR.
P85- when you run out of shotgun rounds.
Cold Steel Recon Tanto- When you want to hear the lung collapse..
Depends on the battle.
The M16 has versatility. The AK has reliability.
Both are very important key elements in a good rifle.
But neither are actual battle rifles. They are assault rifles.
But honestly, I just can't decide on one. I'll have to have both.
I'll also take a FAL or an M14, thanks.
Im a firm supporter of the AK-47, yes it may not be as accurate as the m16 but in the long run I have found that it is not as reliable,durable or low maintenance as the AK. Now be aware that is my opinion, I feel more comfortable with the AK-47 then my AR. Thats just a personal opinion... It isnt the gun of bad guys just the gun that the bad guy logically posseses...
hey since hardly anyone is picking one of the two given choices, I want an ICBM with a giant nuclear warhead... screw your petty bullets
my ar has both a chromed chamber/bore and cleaning kit in the buttstock.
M16 rifle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia