ACR or SCAR-H?

Discussion in 'Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion' started by shon0331, Nov 26, 2011.

  1. shon0331

    shon0331 New Member

    53
    0
    0
    6.8 ACR or SCAR-H?
     
  2. KaiTheGunGuy

    KaiTheGunGuy New Member

    31
    0
    0
    I don't know what you mean, but I think you are asking which I prefer and why. I would prefer the scar-h because it shoots a much bigger round; 7.62x51mm round where the ACR shoots a much harder to find 6.8 Remington special.
     

  3. GUNBOSS1031

    GUNBOSS1031 New Member

    38
    0
    0
    Agreed but just remember scar h mags are 20+1 rounds but im a fnh (and glock) guy. If u get the scar i recomend
    Eotech holo with magnifier
    Green laser
    Surefire taclight 300 lumen
    Grip/bipod scar type
    Im not sure what their called but their are these things that go around thr mag and mag well that is like a secondary grip pretty cool
     
  4. rifleshooter474

    rifleshooter474 New Member

    255
    0
    0
    Bad deal with the FN17H is the Mags are really hard to get and are costly. but the Ammo. 7.62x51 can be bought at a fairly good price, not so sure about the 6.8 Ammo.
     
  5. mjkeat

    mjkeat New Member

    4,026
    0
    0
    I would skip the green laser and the grip pod. Kinda like putting one of those huge import wings on a Farrari.

    The grips are called Ranger Plates or Magpuls

    x51 is the better choice. Like you said it's much easier to find and less expensive.
     
  6. Firearms4ever

    Firearms4ever New Member

    1,757
    0
    0
    Like the others have said the SCAR H utilizes a much easier to find round the 7.62x51mm as compared to the 6.8x43mm. I have had the opportunity to handle a SCAR H/MK 17 (the military's designation for it) and it seemed very well built, fairly familiar compared to the M16/M4/AR15, and more mobile than the M14. One of my cousins is an Army Ranger and when he graduated from the Ranger School (or whatever it is called) I got the opportunity to handle his SCAR H/MK 17.