1911 and sig

Discussion in 'General Handgun Discussion' started by niteglock, Dec 8, 2013.

  1. niteglock

    niteglock New Member

    590
    0
    0
    I might trade my springfld arm 1911 loaded model for a sig p229 40cal model. Think thats a good trade or not? I like the 1911 but ammo getting too expensive to shoot lately. It is extremely accurate and its the U.S model "made in geneseo, IL". Not the other crap. Would you guys ever do that sort of trade or keep the 1911?? I just dont want to get a lemon of a sig if I do it and feel bad for doing that trade. I paid 1k for my 1911 and I know the 229 is a little cheaper also. Any input appreciated. Thanks in advance.
     
  2. Gatoragn

    Gatoragn Active Member

    3,935
    1
    38
    While it could be argued that .40 S&W was more available in the not too distant past, I have not seen it cheaper than .45 or 9mm.

    Sig's are great shooters and I plan to acquire a 226 someday, but I would not give up a loaded Springer for a 229.
     

  3. danf_fl

    danf_fl Retired Supporter

    12,358
    26
    48
    One can never have enough guns!
     
  4. Mercator

    Mercator New Member

    11,337
    2
    0
    For the price of 4 rounds in 45 ACP you get 5 rounds of 40 SW today. Considering that you may be trading down slightly, and that you are cost-conscious, it will take some time to break even.

    On the other hand, the SIG is more versatile and has a broader appeal. Also, sometimes you are just ready for something else.The 1911s have their limitations. I'd call it an even trade for a NIB SIG, acceptable for an exc cond SIG.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2013
  5. jjones45

    jjones45 New Member

    839
    0
    0
    Sig p229 is one awesome, versatile weapon that you can shoot 40s&w and 357sig out of with a quick barrel swap. However like stated earlier 40/357sig ammo isn't much cheaper if at all. I would just keep the 1911 because in the future you will want another anyways. However if you plan to carry said weapon I would probably take the sig as it conceals for me easier than a full size 1911.
     
  6. jjones45

    jjones45 New Member

    839
    0
    0
    Or you can trade for a sig 1911 and have best of both worlds
     
  7. sweeper22

    sweeper22 New Member

    2,706
    0
    0
    The Sig is a $750-850 gun.

    Both are excellent guns. I'd rather conceal-carry a Sig P229. I'd rather depend on the Springer 1911 for home defense. Both are excellent guns that will perform well, although a 5" gov-framed 1911 is likely to yield better results at the range. Neither gun is likely to disappoint.

    FWIW- I don't let caliber cost dictate too many of my handgun decisions. As long as it's common (and as a result, widely available in a variety of loads), that's really all that matters. Both 40sw and 45acp are utterly common. And both are adequate defense choices. 45acp lends itself to faster follow up shots, while 40sw is often slightly more affordable and typically allows for higher capacity. An identical hit with either will yield similar results...like 98% similar.

    So the answer is- pick what works for you. The calibers and guns in question will do their part.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2013
  8. niteglock

    niteglock New Member

    590
    0
    0
    Yeah I think im liking the smaller sig than the full size 1911. I actually find myself admiring my glock 19 more than my 1911 most the time. I know. I know. I love springfields quality but love sigs looks and size of the 229. I do shoot the 1911 great but thats just that. Its a 1911. Really no skill needed to shoot an accurate weapon like that. Still trying to choose.......
     
  9. Gatoragn

    Gatoragn Active Member

    3,935
    1
    38
    If you decide to sell the Springer, FTF has a classifieds section.
     
  10. Mouser

    Mouser Member

    725
    11
    18
    I like to go on a site like gunsamerica and shop the guns I am looking at...I will see a range of prices, conditions etc...of common guns anyways...from there I can get a good feel for the range the gun should be in.

    You will have to make the "value" decision from there. I have a Springfield EMP and it was about $1050 new I think. I am not sure what the .45's are. Many folks have made statements that the .40 ammo is nearly what the .45 ammo is...I don't find it to be so....the round is squarely in between 9mm and .45ACP in terms of cost, performance and it is usually available these days.
     
  11. Wambli

    Wambli New Member

    958
    0
    0
    Both guns are about the same price wise depending on age condition etc. SIG makes a world class pistol so it's not like you'll be trading down. There are a lot of excellent SD loads out there in .40 because everyone wants to get the LE contracts. I live ammo in the 155-165 HP range in the .40. Long answer to say, sure, I would do the trade if I wanted a SIG.
     
  12. Mercator

    Mercator New Member

    11,337
    2
    0
    You may get disappointed. The SIG is just as accurate. It requires no skill to hit the bullseye. In fact it will even walk down the range and retrieve the target for you.
    :D
     
  13. GunRunner

    GunRunner New Member

    754
    0
    0
    If you really like your 1911, I'd suggest keeping it. If you want a nice Sig but don't have a lot of cash I'd search for a Sig 2022 in 40 cal. Should only set you back about $450.
     
  14. niteglock

    niteglock New Member

    590
    0
    0
    Im sold. Lol.
     
  15. niteglock

    niteglock New Member

    590
    0
    0
    Ok. I think ive narrowed it down. Ive heard too much bad stuff about the newer sig series pistols. I think im going to try to find a 229 model E29-40-BSS-NR. I definetely dont like the looks of the longer ejectors in the newer models. But I do like a rail on them considering its going to be a 40cal. Can anyone help me out with choosing one. I dont want to have a lemon. I do also love the "legacy rail" look over the newer style.