I still kick myself for not getting a H&K 91 in the late 1970's, it was only $250 at the time, SA Ruger .45LC's were going for $125 and our new 1978 Bronco cost $8898, I guess it only goes to show how much our US dollar has lost value, since then.
Schnuffle,
They do not look bad at all and for the money. And with Buds reputation I would say they have to be a decent piece or he would not handle them. I have a CETME 308 with all HK 91 Parts on it which looks like an HK 91 and these rifles! I know some have been critical of the CETME Rifle but I have never had one problem with it over the years I have owned and shot it, So for the money they seem very reasonable. Sure would be worth a try! The only thing that I would bring to your attention if they are a copy of the HK 91/93s and the CETME they take a special claw mount to mount optics on them. I will try to locate a picture/s of one and add it to this Post. Here are some pictures!
Keep us informed if you purchase one! And a Range Report!
03
Mr. Sniper, part of the reason I am considering this specific Century is the rail installed on the top. I had a claw on my '91 back 20 years ago and it became a PITA.
I would have kept my HK91 if it had a rail. Even so, I bought it for $325 and sold it for $2450 during the Klinton AWB..
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Firearms Talk
2.3M posts
61.6K members
Since 2007
A forum community dedicated to all firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!