Thank you Art.
Yep me too. I've little use for the NRA. To much we support the 2A ,,,,,,,but,,,, with them. I was a member long ago but dropped them and never looked back.
I personally don't WANT them to have much clout after the bill they tried to push through in KY last spring. FOL signage, fines, expanded no carry places, in trade for no permit to conceal. DOA but the NRA wrote it.
But that's just me personally.
GOA is much more true to the 2A.
I know my state reps personally for since we were kids ,talk to them often both are very pro RTKABA.
Fed reps are pro gun too though only one is as hardline as I'd like on 2A.
Our present self appointed state gun rights group got us saddled with CCDW permits back in the 90s because they couldn't wait a couple of years for permitless cc. So now we are pushing our legislature to be rid of those.
Not many anti gun folks to deal with in my neck of the woods.
JMO but a true died in the wool anti gun person won't be swayed unless they are actually attacked and self preservation Kicks in
As far as soros and bloomy they should both be tried as traitors as their whole agenda is to dismantle the COTUS.
ya Know, it's a d@mn good thing we can't be hung for treason for just our opinions. If only some of us could understand that.
ghost. It's his RIGHT to feel as he does, even if we don't agree with it. It is also his right to spend his money, as he sees fit.
Personally, I find it both alarming, and ironic, that one who claims to be such a patriot, and supporter of the Constitutional Rights of all Americans, can so quickly decide that they do not apply to another person, simply because he does not agree with the same things you do.
Has Bloomberg broken the law in the past? I'd say yes, as I do remember a 20\20 exposee on how easy it is to buy a firearm in most states, in which he paid for supports and staff to tour the country, buying firear,s from local sellers advertising online, and in the local papers.
Most of which were not residents of the state where said purchases took place.
IMHO, that constitutes complicity in the commission of an inllegal act, that also violated federal law at the time, and for that, all participants, including the sellers, some of which did not ask for ID, should be up on both state AND federal charges.
But to wish someone hung for treason, over their views, and how they spend the money they earned? THAT is despicable. Especially from one who takes the intent of the Constitution, and the BOR at face value.
If nothing else, a day in court, and the chance to face his accusers, is owned to him under that document. As it would be to you, if you were chaged with a crime, even treason.