Wrongfully Arrested in Vancouver WA
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Wrongfully Arrested in Vancouver WA

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-14-2014, 03:43 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver,WA
Posts: 6,165
Liked 5009 Times on 2429 Posts
Likes Given: 1601

Default Wrongfully Arrested in Vancouver WA


In this video, Air Force Veteran Mack Worley is wrongfully arrested for trespass while on a public sidewalk over a year ago.

It took almost exactly 1 year for the VPD to return his phone and stolen video but only when forced to do so in discovery at a trial they postponed for as long as they could.

Numerous plea offers were made and rejected because the City refused to turn over the video to the defendant and lied about possessing it on numerous occasions.

I heard Mack's side of the story last year within weeks of it happening and have been patiently waiting for VPD to produce some evidence that their actions were just.

At trial, the trespass charge was dropped but the prosecutor managed to get a guilty verdict on a obscure law about displaying a weapon despite the fact that he was legally open carrying a legal firearm?


Tack
__________________

Last edited by JonM; 07-14-2014 at 03:51 AM. Reason: solicitation of funds removed
Tackleberry1 is offline  
3
People Like This 

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-14-2014, 04:28 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
SSGN_Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,668
Liked 2433 Times on 1428 Posts
Likes Given: 553

Default

Pro-open carry or not. This is one of those attention seeking acts that earned the guy exactly the kind of response he was hoping for. He was hoping the cops would misunderstand. Good job. They did.

By purposefully seeking a police response he created a disturbance with his firearm.

There are right ways and wrong ways to promote the gun owners cause. This doesn't help much.

__________________
SSGN_Doc is offline  
7
People Like This 
Old 07-14-2014, 04:38 AM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mopowerbmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 945
Liked 690 Times on 387 Posts

Default

When you look for trouble,trouble finds you.

__________________
mopowerbmx is offline  
3
People Like This 
Old 07-14-2014, 04:52 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver,WA
Posts: 6,165
Liked 5009 Times on 2429 Posts
Likes Given: 1601

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSGN_Doc View Post
Pro-open carry or not. This is one of those attention seeking acts that earned the guy exactly the kind of response he was hoping for. He was hoping the cops would misunderstand. Good job. They did.

By purposefully seeking a police response he created a disturbance with his firearm.

There are right ways and wrong ways to promote the gun owners cause. This doesn't help much.
I agree and would not personally OC an AR in a location like this "which happens to be a 1/2 mile from my home"

The problem is that after being released from an illegal detention, he was arrested for trespass on a public sidewalk?

It's pretty clear to me that the only reason VPD did this was his assertion of his 4A rights.

They arrested him for "contempt of cop", plain and simple. That's the part I've got a problem with and why I'm supporting him.

Tack
__________________
Tackleberry1 is offline  
8
People Like This 
Old 07-15-2014, 07:49 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver,WA
Posts: 6,165
Liked 5009 Times on 2429 Posts
Likes Given: 1601

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mopowerbmx View Post
When you look for trouble,trouble finds you.
This is true, but when it shows up in the uniform of local PD... It should be "legal."
__________________
Tackleberry1 is offline  
2
People Like This 
Old 07-15-2014, 10:31 AM   #6
Administrator
FTF_ADMIN.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
G30USMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 10,547
Liked 1396 Times on 944 Posts
Likes Given: 168

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSGN_Doc View Post
Pro-open carry or not. This is one of those attention seeking acts that earned the guy exactly the kind of response he was hoping for. He was hoping the cops would misunderstand. Good job. They did.

By purposefully seeking a police response he created a disturbance with his firearm.

There are right ways and wrong ways to promote the gun owners cause. This doesn't help much.

+1000....... Amen !
__________________
G30USMC is offline  
2
People Like This 
Old 07-15-2014, 11:08 AM   #7
Big TOW
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
WebleyFosbery38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Irish Settlement CNY
Posts: 6,779
Liked 7506 Times on 3828 Posts
Likes Given: 8409

Default

I think the biggest prob here was the guy was out of his league, 3 armed LEO's likely trump one OC (Obsessive Compulsive). If he was trying to make a point, it got lost the second he attempted to cross back onto private property after somewhat successfully trying to make that point. All they had to do was wait and he was bound to give them a string to hang him with, he did.

If your out to make a point, be sure its one you can sleep comfortably with. He knew what he was getting himself into, he just pushed it one step too far. Im sure that LEO's work for us but understand they have one personal goal, to go home after their shift and be with their family. Momma didnt raise no fool, never disrespect someone with a badge and a gun, you can lose bigtime.

OC is a a basic right in all 50 states that has somehow been made illegal in most of them, I disagree with the states take on it but I will try to only pick fights Im sure I will come out on top. His lone voice only put him in a place he had nobody standing beside him other than legal counsel.

__________________
WebleyFosbery38 is offline  
2
People Like This 
Old 07-15-2014, 01:02 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
clr8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 3,936
Liked 1278 Times on 852 Posts
Likes Given: 837

Default

My question is where is the line here? I thought the cops were for the most part, being pretty polite and respectable. So, would it have hurt to answer some of their questions? At what point are you obligated to? I get the feeling that if he'd told them his name, and why he's toting an AR, they'd have let him go without further difficulties. Honestly, I'd have to put him in the category with the Target guys. Dumbass.

__________________

I don't see what the problem is. Everybody is being nice, and getting along, and I, for one, am learning stuff. So, if you don't like the discussion, don't look at the thread. Or, simply cut to the chase, and close it.
_________________
Is there an age limit for a thread, after which we kill it?

clr8ter is offline  
AIKIJUTSU Likes This 
Old 07-15-2014, 01:29 PM   #9
Troll Scout
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: HillJack Commons
Posts: 1,378
Liked 1176 Times on 629 Posts
Likes Given: 723

Default

Yep, he has absolutely no right to go about his day freely.

If one is going to OC you'd better be prepared to defend that "RIGHT" as most of the LE in this country have been trained to disarm the public. Physically or thru intimidation to the point where most are afraid to expose a firearm even under the most innocent of intent.



The pyscho latino gal with the shotgun should be counting her blessings.

__________________
WNGMSTR is offline  
3
People Like This 
Old 07-15-2014, 01:39 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
clr8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 3,936
Liked 1278 Times on 852 Posts
Likes Given: 837

Default

Quote:
even under the most innocent of intent.
I'm not sure that phrase is applicable. These people's intent is to basically pick a fight. They have no other reason to have a rifle on them. I watched a video from Cali where the cops made sure it was unloaded, as per the law. (It was) So, that right there removes all defense arguments. What is left? NOTHING. They're picking a fight. Want proof? Who takes an unloaded gun, and walks around with it "while my car is being washed" (that's what the Cali guy actually said), while videotaping the WHOLE time? No one.

Now, if someone said, "I live down there, and I'm going to the range a mile down the street.", whole different story. But so far I have never heard of that.
__________________

I don't see what the problem is. Everybody is being nice, and getting along, and I, for one, am learning stuff. So, if you don't like the discussion, don't look at the thread. Or, simply cut to the chase, and close it.
_________________
Is there an age limit for a thread, after which we kill it?

clr8ter is offline  
2
People Like This 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
NYS man arrested jjfuller1 New York Gun Forum 47 11-06-2013 08:40 AM
NYC, arrested for toy gun TankTop Firearms in the Media 2 05-12-2013 02:27 AM
Council Member MELTDOWN Highlights - Vancouver City, WA Poink88 The Club House 10 10-03-2010 06:29 PM
Man cited for open carry in Vancouver,WA. Gojubrian General Handgun Discussion 15 03-30-2010 06:47 PM