Originally Posted by Daoust_Nat
I think it is more about the solidarity then anything else. Not many could, but you might find some either high enough in the state's food chain, or with their own personal wealth who could afford to. Now they have to find a way to do it out of state.
Good for Wilson.
The large publicly traded companies like Ruger and S&W would be open to stockholder law suits if they did this, so we need the smaller, self owned companies to do so.
Now we need Kimber to move out of NYC, and Remington to move out of New York State. Bennelli to move out of Maryland would be good also.
^^this!!!! You are spot on 100%!!! The slew of law suits will keep the public companies from black balling government agencies etc, but moving their companies, jobs and tax dollars to states that support their business and cause will hit them where it really counts, their bottom line.
I'd like to add that if pro gun states would offer incentives to companies that want to be in a more favorable environment maybe companies would be more inclined to close up shop in states like New York and take their $$$$$ elsewhere..