Why California and other States have Antigun Laws
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Why California and other States have Antigun Laws

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-13-2008, 06:14 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 578
Default Why California and other States have Antigun Laws

I have wonder how they get away with these insane laws , after all we have the Nations Constitution that should stop them Plus the individual states Constitutions . Or do we ?

I have been looking up the Constitutions of many states and finally got around to looking at California's and it is only the second state that I can not find the Right to Arms for the individual citizen , joined only by the state of New York which we know also has moronic laws .

Cali has one of the most long winded , useless babbling going on and on about the right of speech I have ever seen yet I didn't find the Right to arms .

Admittedly I only skimmed it but then again all I did was skim the others and it was a right easily found .

Here are example of what other States have to say in no particular order

Deleware § 20. Right to keep and bear arms.

Section 20. A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and State, and for hunting and recreational use.

State of Illinois , SECTION 22. RIGHT TO ARMS
Subject only to the police power, the right of the
individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be
infringed.

Ohio § 1.04 Bearing arms; standing armies; military powers (1851)
[ View Article Table of Contents ]

The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be kept up; and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power

Missouri Section 23. That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned; but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons.

MASSACHUSETTS

Article XVII. The people have a right to keep and to bear arms for the common defence. And as, in time of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be maintained without the consent of the legislature; and the military power shall always be held in an exact subordination to the civil authority, and be governed by it.

Maine

Section 16. To keep and bear arms. Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms and this right shall never be questioned.

Pennsylvania

Section 21 . Right to Bear Arms
The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned

Vermont Article 16. [Right to bear arms; standing armies; military power subordinate to civil]

That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State--and as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power.

Rhode Island

Section 22. Right to bear arms. -- The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

And on and on it goes with the exception of New Jersy which also has some moronic laws "I just looked at their constitution for the first time" .

If you want to look all of this up for yourself be prepared for dead links and all kinds of PITA's , seems like they really don't want a citizen to know their Rights , imagine that .

Hope this has been informative and interesting to few folks .

__________________
BigO01 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 06-13-2008, 06:19 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3479 Times on 1609 Posts
Likes Given: 3590

Default

I actually did find that informative. Thank you for posting.

JD

__________________
Dillinger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 06:26 PM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

I have essentially given up on California. My wife and I are moving to Oregon by Christmas. It will be nice to be back in America.

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 07:11 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
fxstchewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Newton,NC
Posts: 121
Post

Sec. 30. Militia and the right to bear arms.

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; and, as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be maintained, and the military shall be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. Nothing herein shall justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons, or prevent the General Assembly from enacting penal statutes against that practice.

NC also has CCW.

This is North Carolina.

__________________

Last edited by fxstchewy; 06-13-2008 at 08:51 PM.
fxstchewy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 07:19 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3479 Times on 1609 Posts
Likes Given: 3590

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CA357 View Post
I have essentially given up on California. My wife and I are moving to Oregon by Christmas. It will be nice to be back in America.
Depending on what part of Oregon that is. Some of the Haight-Ashbury sect migrated North as well and found homes around Portland and Seattle where I am at.

JD
__________________
Dillinger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 08:01 PM   #6
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigO01 View Post
I have wonder how they get away with these insane laws , after all we have the Nations Constitution that should stop them Plus the individual states Constitutions .
There are some folks who believe the Bill of Rights is an acknowledgment of a set of rights that the Federal government may not infringe upon. States are a whole different matter, implying that state governments may take those rights away.

Of course, that's a load of hooey, and there is no shortage of legal precedent to support that contention. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and no government body at any level may deprive people of rights defined in the Bill of Rights.

The Supreme Court ruled in 1943 in Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 105 that it is illegal for a government agency to require that a citizen pay a fee in order for them to engage in a right acknowledged by the Bill of Rights. Specifically, the ruling read:
A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution... The power to impose a license tax on the exercise of these freedoms is indeed as potent as the power of censorship which this Court has repeatedly struck down... a person cannot be compelled 'to purchase, through a license fee or a license tax, the privilege freely granted by the constitution.'
So why do I have to pay nearly $200 and wait six months to a year to get a handgun permit in Monroe County in New York State?

When the law is so "nuanced" and complicated that opposite rulings on essentially the same matter are both "legal", we cease to have a system of laws that works to our benefit.

Thanks for the info on the state constitutions. That's useful and interesting.
__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 08:18 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ScottG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,614
Liked 9 Times on 3 Posts

Default

They have those laws because we don't march on the capitols and demand their repeal.

__________________

9x18=Makarov

ScottG is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 08:21 PM   #8
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottG View Post
They have those laws because we don't march on the capitols and demand their repeal.
DINGDINGDINGDINGDING! WE HAVE A WINNER!

Seriously, government left untended will do whatever it damn well pleases. An apathetic electorate is its own worst enemy. (See my sig for details.)
__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 11:39 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottG View Post
They have those laws because we don't march on the capitols and demand their repeal.
Yes Unfortunately I knew that long ago , I suppose I should have clarified as to the How they get away with it in their own little world where "Law" rules the land yet there it is in black and white "Laws" that should stop them cold in their tracks .

We all know all any "Law" is nothing more than an rule agreed upon by those we have given power over us yet how ironic it is even when the majority disagree with a law and want it's destruction or wish the creation of one those same people couldn't give a damn what we want .

How sad that the citizens of the newly formed union in 1776 should have been more comfortable with exercising the Rights of their Second Amendment instead of the First if they had we would never have found ourselves in the present mess with corrupt leaders everywhere we look . "Yes I know the Constitution didn't yet exist"

So ridiculous it is that even when the Supremes finally strike down some absurd Law that the makers act as if nothing happened and they merrily pass another law that is only a fraction from being identical to the one just struck down and they begin wasting precious millions and violating rights all over again .

While I know it sounds silly I have always thought that the Supreme Court should control it's own special enforcement section almost like that in the Movie "Judge Dred" For instance with the Heller case assuming it goes the way it should affirming that we do indeed have the Right to Bear Arms .

Within seconds of the judgment being released we will have scum such as Paul Helmke and others running their mouths describing what other angles they will use to destroy our rights , at that moment the Supreme Enforcement section should show up with a long flatbed truck filled with gallows and begin rounding them up one by one and slow hanging them right there in public , or perhaps simply dosing them with gasoline and lighting on fire , hmm no gasoline is far to expensive now to waste on trash like Helmke isn't it ?

Once a Right has indeed been reaffirmed by court ruling anyone attempting to violate it should be arrested convicted and hanged for treason against the nations founding rights of the citizens , First Amendment be damned !!

Free speech for the purpose of destroying the union and making us once again subjects of a new tyrants wasn't exactly what the founders had in mind .
__________________
BigO01 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 01:02 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
RL357Mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albany,New York
Posts: 3,251
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts

Default

[QUOTE]

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkt View Post
[/INDENT]So why do I have to pay nearly $200 and wait six months to a year to get a handgun permit in Monroe County in New York State?
My brother who lives in Westchester County asked this same question of an NRA lawyer when he was seeking their assistance in getting his CCW permit without paying an exorbitant fee and supplying personal information such as SS#, Income and Credit info, and other records. The NRA told him he would have to hire an attorney who has NY State Supreme Court experience. Apparently the NRA is only concerned with high-profile cases and has no concern whatsoever for joe blow from Westchester County! I am going to let my NRA membership expire and give my money to GOA, LEAA, and the SAF instead.
__________________
Guns Have Only Two Enemies-Rust and Politicians
"The United States Constitution (c) 1791 - All Rights Reserved"
If Guns Kill, Do Pencils Mis-spell Words?
Pain is Weakness Leaving the Body - USMC
"Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum"
RL357Mag is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
States to feds: Stay in D.C.! Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 1 05-14-2009 02:01 AM
States that Won't Allow Back-Ups When CCW Captain38 Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 10 04-15-2009 12:17 PM
NH sovereignty, more states possible? supergus The Club House 11 03-27-2009 07:54 PM
Firearms friendly states painted_klown Politics, Religion and Controversy 35 02-18-2009 12:13 AM
most pro-gun to anti-gun states taseal The Club House 2 08-23-2008 05:47 PM