White House Determines Gun Control Executive Action Can Be Taken! - Page 5
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > White House Determines Gun Control Executive Action Can Be Taken!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2013, 04:43 PM   #41
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
hiwall's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cleator,AZ
Posts: 3,284
Liked 710 Times on 458 Posts
Likes Given: 227

Default

I can not see Congress passing anything(maybe gas). So IF Obama is serious about increasing gun control his only option would be Executive Order or Presidential Proclamation. He could easily do this. Congress of course could override anything he did but it would take a two thirds vote in both houses(to over ride a veto). Do you see that ever happening? Then there is the Supreme Court. He would have at least two years before they would act(if they did). The 1994 assault weapons ban passed and nothing was done about it. It never even came close to the Supreme Court. And there was no big protests or anything else. He could change semi-autos to the same class as full-autos or make magazines the same class as a suppressor. As long as he sent out no JBT house to house there would be no outrage. The media would praise him. Most of the Dems would kiss him. Before it ever got to the Supreme Court(if it ever did) there is a good chance he would have appointed 1 or 2 new justices.

__________________

Just walking on the edge of of my grave.

hiwall is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 04:48 PM   #42
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Overkill0084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,214
Liked 2729 Times on 1356 Posts
Likes Given: 267

Default

BHO & cronies magically determine that they can do whatever the hell they want. Because, well, "F**k you, gun owners, that's why." What's odd is that anyone is surprised by that.

__________________
Cheers,
Greg
USAF Retired
NRA Life Member

"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Overkill0084 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 04:50 PM   #43
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 214
Liked 14 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 28

Default

They just want us unarmed so they can take land and property like the UN and brazilian forces did this week in brazil to unarmed people and farmers. It's so very sad !!

__________________
eltoro is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 05:17 PM   #44
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
chloeshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Great North Woods
Posts: 2,460
Liked 1979 Times on 1029 Posts
Likes Given: 379

Default

ha! I always likes that one.......

543279_456569257731898_1989737216_n.jpg  
__________________
leave the cannoli - take the gun
chloeshooter is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 05:30 PM   #45
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
John_Deer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,875
Liked 1504 Times on 1019 Posts
Likes Given: 522

Default

Bush and more so Obama have used executive orders because congress is doing nothing. When the Iranians were cyber attacking our banking system congress couldn't pass a law to force ISP's to provide the needed security because they attached a bunch of other laws to the bill. Obama was left no choice but to issue an executive order. I remember the ISP bill because it had a magazine ban attached to it. How many other times has congress backed Obama into the same corner? We all have a right to be angry. It's easy to point the finger at Obama. But we should be keeping notes to vote out the congressional bums in 2014. One here in NC that has to go is Kay Hagan.

__________________

Nothing in the affairs of men is worthy of great anxiety - Plato

John_Deer is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 05:35 PM   #46
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Tackleberry1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver,WA
Posts: 5,925
Liked 4715 Times on 2281 Posts
Likes Given: 1442

Default

BHO has not faced impeachment for past transgression and abuses of EO's because the right had an election to win and did not want to stir up the liberal protest machine.

What Republicans and Democrats need to understand is that we pose a far greater threat to civic order that the Obambies ever could.

Would welfare babies riot if there Gravy Train in Chief was impeached? Sure the would, probably burn down dozens of neighborhoods in the process...

...but that possibility is insignificant compared to the carnage of a second civil war. And make no mistake...conservative trust in the Government and any trust in the separation of powers was LOST when the SCOTUS upheld Obama Care.

No way will "serious" gun owners register and this will set the stage for the conflicts with LEO's to grow. A few dead cops is all the justification they will need for martial law.

I've seen too much "coincidence" in the last month to believe anything but the obvious threat and attempted gun grab that's coming our way. Our enemies know they loose in Congress and they loose in court so there only play is draconian violations of 2A rights...the sit back and wait for the "excuse" to act in the National Interest.

Avoiding this requires a clear message to Capitol hill.

WE WILL NOT COMPLY! If our elected Senators and Congresman fail to stop BHO...we WILL.

Congress should make no mistake...none of us want conflict BUT should congress fail to protect our liberty...we WILL defend it and we will not fail.

...so...there is no easy way out for lawmakers, there's no deal to cut, no compromise to be had...stop BHO or we will all suffer for it.
Tack

__________________
Tackleberry1 is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 10:47 PM   #47
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Jpyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,815
Liked 762 Times on 441 Posts
Likes Given: 457

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alsaqr

Show me "executive order" in that statement.
Its not in the headline but is in Biden's full statement that is quoted in the article.
__________________

"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington

Jpyle is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Eric Holder: executive orders on gun control? Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 21 12-29-2012 08:59 AM
White House describes gun control measures Obama supports Wiebelhaus Politics, Religion and Controversy 25 12-19-2012 09:58 PM
White House to Welcome Rapper Who Wants U.S. Troops Tortured to the White House Overkill0084 Politics, Religion and Controversy 19 12-08-2012 08:16 PM
From the White House to the Big House dunerunner Politics, Religion and Controversy 4 08-22-2010 12:02 PM
Turn me in to the white house opaww Politics, Religion and Controversy 15 08-09-2009 06:35 PM



Newest Threads