[Bigcountry02]

This is from ammoland, stop worrying about what weapon is on the ban list and read this bloody bill. Read between the lines, this is a push for entire weapons ban.

Too much to mention, read ammoland link, your head will spin!

http://www.ammoland.com/2013/01/every-gun-with-a-grip-is-banned/#axzz2JXEGZvmv

http://www.weapon-blog.com/2013/01/what-feinsteins-failed-to-tell-you/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/122199090/S-150

‘‘(46) The term ‘pistol grip’ means a grip, a thumb-hole stock, or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.

The problem on page 13:
All semi-autos are outlawed, not just some.

Pro-rights and anti-rights attention has been focused on the tremendous list of guns that would be banned under Feinstein’s bill, which takes up a significant portion of the 122 pages of this proposal.

Here’s the problem none of the “news” reports have spotted:
•The list of guns doesn’t matter.
•Magazine size doesn’t matter.
•If the semi-auto firearm has anything to grip it by, it is banned.
•It’s very clever actually.

According to the bill, any semiautomatic firearm that uses a magazine — handgun, rifle or shotgun — equipped with a “pistol grip,” would be banned. That sounds like a limitation, but it is not.

A pistol grip (on page 2) is defined (on page 13) as “a grip, a thumb-hole stock, or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.” In other words, the gun list does not matter. It is a smokescreen designed to distract people from the true meaning of the bill. And it has done a magnificent job. It worked!

Any semi-automatic firearm that exists, with anything on it you can grip, is banned. (There is a grandfather clause for old stuff.)

The list is meaningless tripe. It is camouflage for the real purpose of the bill. When the president said he is not going to take away your guns, well, Feinstein’s bill puts the lie to that.

Magazine size does not matter. Brand name does not matter. It doesn’t matter if it’s black. If you can grip it, it’s banned under this bill.

[TNFrank]

So how are ya' suppose to hold the dang thing if it doesn't have some kind of grip?
I really think she's totally gone insane. A rational person would understand that a grip or any other cosmetic aspect of a firearm has no real bearing on how it functions.
I wonder when they'll get around to AirSoft guns with all those "evil" features. After all, even though they're not really dangerous they DO look scary. LOL

[Trez]

Almost.. Its written like this:
The law (if this passes):

“(36) The term ‘semiautomatic assault weapon’ means any of the following, regardless of country of manufacture or caliber of ammunition accepted:”
“(A) A semiautomatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any 1 of the following:”
“(i) A pistol grip.”
“(46) The term ‘pistol grip’ means a grip, a thumb-hole stock, or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.”

[The same language is repeated for handguns and shotguns; magazine includes belt fed; also included: "Any combination of parts from which a firearm described in subparagraphs (A) through (K) can be assembled;"]

Looks like it says semi-automatic rifle to me...

[Rarity]

They know exactly what they are doing, and it isn't because they are crazy. Their agenda is for complete control, but they will use gun safety as an excuse to manipulate many to follow along with them.

[dog2000tj]

Originally Posted by Rarity

They know exactly what they are doing, and it isn't because they are crazy. Their agenda is for complete control, but they will use gun safety as an excuse to manipulate many to follow along with them.

Ding ding dign ... we have a winner!!! Just like the NY Safe Act which banned any firearm that holds more than 7rds ... Fienstien's "list" of banned firearms is irrelevant

read the fine print ... the gun control advocates are hoping the Legislators don't when they vote on it

[AR10]

The political folks in DC are the ones that need to get a grip.

The people's rights to bear arms shall not be infringed.

[steadyshot]

It is typical for liberal wack jobs like Sen. Feinstein to misrepresent facts and distort the truth in order to promote their political agenda. Dianne Feinstein is a crook and a liar. She is profiting from insider trading and steering lucrative contracts to her husband (all legal for members of Congress). This two face wack job also carries a gun with her, even when she is on Capital grounds.

She is a good example of a present day hypocrite elitist. The laws for you and not for me type.....

[7point62]

X2 on all of the above. The bill as worded is vague enough to be inclusive of just about anything.

[opaww]

Originally Posted by TNFrank

So how are ya' suppose to hold the dang thing if it doesn't have some kind of grip?
I really think she's totally gone insane. A rational person would understand that a grip or any other cosmetic aspect of a firearm has no real bearing on how it functions.
I wonder when they'll get around to AirSoft guns with all those "evil" features. After all, even though they're not really dangerous they DO look scary. LOL

Use the force Luke

[ninjatoth]

SO basically,in the end,she is trying to-at the bare minimum force all the armed people in this country to have only 6 shooters and pump shotguns so that the government can be in total control with far superior firepower at any time?