Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > What Does The Second Amendment Mean To You?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-25-2013, 06:43 AM   #1
Concealed Carry Instructor
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
AR10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 1,917
Liked 870 Times on 578 Posts
Likes Given: 220

Default What Does The Second Amendment Mean To You?

:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

I see two harmonious aspects to this simple and straight forward paragraph.

Before the comma, we have a militia, or military or governing force.

After the comma, we see the people of this land.

I don't think the founding fathers were calling the people the militia, though in many or even most cases, they were. I think the founding fathers were implementing a procedure where the people were to be equal with the government to keep government from becoming tyrannical.



__________________
AR10 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-25-2013, 07:33 AM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,485
Liked 896 Times on 511 Posts
Likes Given: 363

Default

Of course the founding fathers were calling the people the militia. We weren't fighting our battles against the British with what passed for a standing army and winning. The people of this nation, and a minority of the people of this nation at that, used guerrilla warfare against the British and won because they were willing to shoot and run away to live to fight another day.

Our tactics were a lot like the Taliban in Afghanistan, except no Apaches, JDAM's, or .50 caliber machine guns. QRF was called cavalry- and they actually rode horses. The Taliban have been keeping our military busy for more than 10 years now. Must be something to hit and run tactics.

The Continental Army wasn't an army to speak of in comparison to the British Army. We didn't win through force of arms, just better tactics.



__________________
kbd512 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 10:36 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Donn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 901
Liked 348 Times on 232 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbd512 View Post
The Continental Army wasn't an army to speak of in comparison to the British Army. We didn't win through force of arms, just better tactics.
Attrition played a big part too. The Brits were fighting France at the time, as well as trying to keep a lid on the rest of the Empire. They were stretched way too thin and were pretty much out of money. Sound familiar?
__________________
Never argue with an idiot in public. People passing by won't know which one of you is the idiot.
Donn is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 10:59 AM   #4
Concealed Carry Instructor
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
AR10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 1,917
Liked 870 Times on 578 Posts
Likes Given: 220

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donn View Post

Attrition played a big part too. The Brits were fighting France at the time, as well as trying to keep a lid on the rest of the Empire. They were stretched way too thin and were pretty much out of money. Sound familiar?
It sure does.
__________________
AR10 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 01:21 PM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 8,762
Liked 5126 Times on 2922 Posts
Likes Given: 4336

Default

The 2A is comprised of two clauses, the "prefatory" clause and the "operative" clause.

The operative clause defines the action, the prefatory clause simply explains the operative clause, it cannot modify the operative clause.

The militia clause simply tells us why the "rights" clause is needed.

__________________

"Politics is the art of the possible" Otto von Bismarck.

locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:22 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
chloeshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Great North Woods
Posts: 2,234
Liked 1739 Times on 900 Posts
Likes Given: 345

Default

To me it means there is a power balance (at least an attempt at one) between the people and their government. Other than the voting booth. It doesn't say anything about our right to self-defense, per Se. It doesn't have to, that's a natural law for most of us.

__________________
leave the cannoli - take the gun
chloeshooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:31 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Free State of Winston, AL
Posts: 2,600
Liked 1590 Times on 944 Posts
Likes Given: 786

Default

We already covered this. Read the other thread!!!!

"2nd amendment right to bear arms"

__________________

An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!


Last edited by JimRau; 02-25-2013 at 02:39 PM.
JimRau is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 09:12 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Garadex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 1,267
Liked 225 Times on 176 Posts
Likes Given: 228

Default

I see my right to do whatever I want with my guns as long as it doesn't harm anyone or put them in danger.

__________________

I'm gonna stop you right there, you just said an AR-15 is a high-powered rifle. It is obvious you don't know anything about guns and I shall ignore anything you say from this point on.

Garadex is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 11:03 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 21
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

To truly grasp the meaning of the 2a and the constitution as a whole, one must look further than the words and examine the character of the men that wrote them. For the most part it is a simple document to read and understand. The men who wrote it on the other hand were not simple men just jotting down some words, they were extraordinary. Reading the words is easy but to understand why they were written and to realize the passion behind the words requires knowing our history. If we are going to win the long term battle of preserving our rights then we must start teaching our children American history again. They need to know and understand the massive sacrifices that were made to ensure and protect their rights and freedoms.

__________________
JohnnyRingo is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 11:59 PM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,170
Liked 5731 Times on 3358 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

It is a decent attempt to spell out the natural born right of every human to an armed self-defense. I don't see where it limits what it recognizes as things we can defend against or things we can defend with.



__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
2nd amendment ThomasJefferson2013 Gunsmithing Forum 7 01-21-2013 01:42 AM
NC Amendment 1 tCan Politics, Religion and Controversy 7 05-08-2012 07:34 PM
what first amendment? mountainman13 Politics, Religion and Controversy 7 05-05-2012 04:33 AM
pro-gun amendment to HR 980 Kelly J Legal and Activism 1 05-14-2008 08:12 AM