Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > WARNING! A False Flag Group Launches Today

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2013, 09:00 AM   #41
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Mason609's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Quincy,MA
Posts: 1,301
Liked 564 Times on 331 Posts
Likes Given: 3221

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texaswoodworker View Post
You won't tolerate their political stands because they won't endorse someone that is antigun like Obama. If a 100% PRO GUN democrat ran for office, you might see a little support from the NRA.




What exactly is "common sense" or "sane" gun ownership? Background checks? They don't work. Criminals will always find a way around them.

Assault weapon ban? Semi auto rifles are used in a VERY small amount of crimes. You are MUCH more likely to be beaten to death with someone's bare hands than you are being shot by a rifle of any kind. Plus, it's been proven that they don't work. The crime rate didn't go down during the last assault weapons ban, the Newtown shooting happened under an assault weapons ban, and the recent shooting in California happened under an assault weapons ban.

Ban high capacity magazines? I know for a fact that 30 round magazines don't have any true advantages over 10 rounder's. It takes about a second or two to change mags. What's the difference between one 30 rd mag, and three 10 round mags in a shooting? A couple seconds is nowhere near enough time for someone to react and tackle the shooter (a popular argument used by antigunners).

Gun free zones? The fact is, they don't work. The vast majority of shootings happen in gun free zones where people do not have the ability to defend themselves.

Gun registration? They ALWAYS lead to confiscation. Do you really want that?

So I ask you, what is "sane" gun ownership? What are "common sense" gun laws? All I see here are violations of the 2nd Amendment.
The NRA may not currently publicly endorse him, but they still finance Harry Reid's campaigns - that is why I don't endorse them.

All firearms laws going back to the NFA (maybe even earlier) are violations of the 2nd Amendment. However, I do feel that if a state wants to keep violent felons from being able to own/possess a firearm, then that's their right.
__________________

Insert witty comment here......


Veritas Aequitas

Vincit Omnia Veritas

Vincere est Vivere

Mason609 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 09:32 AM   #42
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Axxe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East Texas, Texas!
Posts: 27,141
Liked 19824 Times on 11257 Posts
Likes Given: 49976

Default

any organization that doesn't understand, "Shall Not Be Infringed" is not pro-gun or pro-2nd amendment. the NRA understands this and always has.

have any of the bans, restrictions, or gun control laws yet, prevented violent attacks on innocent people? not hardly! have they prevented any type of criminal acts? i doubt it. have they yet kept guns out of the hands of criminals or seriously mentally disturbed individuals? ummm, no.

so an organization that wants more restrictions, that further hinders LAC's wants us to believe it's in our best interests? hmmmmmm.......sounds pretty liberal to me. another backdoor method of subversive tactics to divide us and put us at odds with one another.

no thank you, i'm not interested. IMO, the 2nd amendment works just fine for me.

my final words are this, you either support the 2nd admendment in it's entirety, or you don't. IMO, with regards to the 2nd amendment, it's all or nothing, as there is no compromise or middle ground.

__________________
Coming From The Village Of The Damned.
Resist All Tyranny And Oppression.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil, is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke.
Axxe55 is offline  
4
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 11:34 PM   #43
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 605
Liked 316 Times on 189 Posts
Likes Given: 508

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rn-cindy View Post
The thing is....Even if you do think things like expanded background checks, or a waiting period might be good, They would just be considered stepping stones to the gun grabbers. If you give in on one of those things,, do you think Brady, Bloomturd, etc are going to pack up, and go home...no, they are going to say...whats next....until they reach their goal...total confiscation......
This is what I have said for years, if you give in to the antis on anything they immediately come back for more. However if you fight them tooth and nail even if they win they back off for awhile to regroup and resupply. This new group seems fishy to me. Besides, I feel very well represented by the NRA, CCRKBA and LEAA.
__________________
Warrior1256 is offline  
5
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2013, 01:32 AM   #44
Lifetime Supporting Member
FTF_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Vikingdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains,CA
Posts: 13,435
Liked 7730 Times on 4463 Posts
Likes Given: 9975

Default

I am not always aligned with everything the NRA, GOA, CRPA or any other pro-gun group that I support, but at least I know exactly where they stand and what they stand for. I am willing to support them.

This group seems to me to be a little less transparent. Or should I say their stance on the Second Amendment is not crystal clear. I have not seen anything that tells with absolute clarity exactly what they are trying to achieve. I am all for safety. I preach it every day. They say they are too, but they are using language that is not unambiguous. They are using known anti-gun buzzwords that have historically proven to be the words of gun banners. Some of their statements say to me that they are in favor of some serious infringements on our freedom.

I will not be supporting this venture.

__________________

Shoot me an email at vikingdad995@gmail.com

Check out the Firearmstalk Podcasts with Vikingdad and DrFootball! https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/firearms-talk-podcast/id778007899

Quote:
"Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."
- Mohandas Gandhi, an Autobiography, page 446.
Vikingdad is offline  
5
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 03:29 AM   #45
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Daoust_Nat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando,Florida
Posts: 2,035
Liked 1157 Times on 568 Posts
Likes Given: 72

Default

Tom Gresham took a shot at these guys yesterday also.

Gresham's contention is that they always show up with these groups about one year before an election. We are about 16 months before a very important mid term election.

__________________

A bad day at the range is better then a good day on the job!

Daoust_Nat is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 06:47 AM   #46
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lima,Ohio
Posts: 2,705
Liked 2201 Times on 993 Posts
Likes Given: 2133

Default

Anybody remember obama's campaign add with the supposed life member of the NRA endorsing him? Just more of the same BS. Anyone who compromises with liberals is a damned fool.

__________________
rjd3282 is offline  
readygirl Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Took my church youth group shooting today Garadex Range Report 4 05-02-2013 12:54 AM
Big Sis Launches Undercover TSA Spies to Ride Houston Buses Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 30 04-19-2012 01:06 AM
KAHR P-38 First Group on the Range Today Sniper03 Semi-Auto Handguns 3 07-30-2011 10:26 PM
Holder Launches Witch Hunt Against Biased Banks! Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 9 07-14-2011 02:32 PM