Victim sues gun maker, distributor
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism >

Victim sues gun maker, distributor


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2012, 12:21 AM   #1
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default Victim sues gun maker, distributor

Court: Shooting Victim Can Sue Gun Maker, Distributor
Saturday, 06 Oct 2012 12:01 AM

A Buffalo man who was shot nearly a decade ago can sue the manufacturer, the distributor and the dealer of the semi-automatic pistol used to shoot him, a New York state appeals court ruled on Friday.

Attorneys for Daniel Williams, who was shot in 2003 when he was in high school, argued that Ohio-based manufacturer Beemiller and the distributor, MKS Supply, violated federal law by knowingly supplying guns to irresponsible dealers.

The defendants said they cannot be sued because of the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, a 2005 law that shields firearm manufacturers and sellers from liability for harm caused by the criminal misuse of their non-defective products.

A unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, on Friday reversed a 2011 ruling that threw out the case against the defendants — Beemiller, MKS Supply and gun dealer Charles Brown, who sold the guns to James Bostic, a Buffalo resident accused of running a trafficking scheme that funneled guns into the black market in New York.

The decision reinstates the case.

The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, which is representing Williams, claims Bostic is a convicted felon and is barred from purchasing guns, according to the ruling.

The center said Bostic traveled to Ohio, which does not require a license to buy a gun, to procure a large numbers of handguns, including the pistol used to shoot Williams, the ruling said.

"Although the complaint does not specify the statutes allegedly violated, it sufficiently alleges facts supporting a finding that defendants knowingly violated federal gun laws," Justice Erin Peradotto wrote for the court.

Jeffrey Malsch, a lawyer for MKS, said he is reviewing the decision.

"We believe (the lower court's ruling) was a courageous and legally correct decision, but the Fourth Department was unwilling to follow his well reasoned opinion," he said. "Whether we appeal or not, we are confident that ultimately the facts will contradict the baseless allegations in the complaint and the case will be dismissed."

Attorneys for Williams and the remaining defendants did not immediately return requests for comment.

© 2012 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 10-08-2012, 12:26 AM   #2
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 19,282
Liked 6836 Times on 3634 Posts
Likes Given: 513

Default

so that means its good to go for a violent crime victim to sue the sht out of the brady center for preventing them from carrying a firearm that would have prevented their injuries...
__________________
"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

"I crapped my pants to avoid the draft!!" -Ted Nugent
JonM is offline  
7
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 12:48 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dog2000tj's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,309
Liked 3740 Times on 1828 Posts
Likes Given: 13270

Default

great news ... now I can sue the SBC for my work accident back in 98'!

After all, it was their guidelines that permitted for the use of stapling of truss components rather than gussets that were a direct result in my falling 24' through a roof onto a concrete slab!
__________________
Member: NRA GOA

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Est sularas oth mithas

"either way, you were guilty by association, so you were smited...." JD
dog2000tj is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 12:49 AM   #4
Administrator
FTF_ADMIN.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 18,386
Liked 11025 Times on 4771 Posts
Likes Given: 1812

Default

THAT decision will be overturned on appeal. It is directly contrary to law- a law that was passed for this very reason. Comparable to suing Ford because they built a car used by a drunk driver who ran into someone.

15 U.S.C. §§ 7901-7903.

The law flatly orders pending cases to be dismissed, and bars filing further cases.
__________________
What we have here is... failure- to communicate.
c3shooter is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 01:14 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
NCFlyfisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mt. Mitchell, NC
Posts: 5
Likes Given: 1

Default

And how many does the U.S. Firearms industry provide our economy with much needed jobs?

I doubt this new decision will go forward.

Heck Mexico tried in 2011: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20056210-10391695.html

Good thing the The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act still had bearing.

Plus this is in New York where firearms have been a bane.

Sort of odd since without them some 200+ years ago, New York might've been part of the United Kington...
NCFlyfisher is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 11:57 AM   #6
Lifetime Supporting Member
FTF_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
7point62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Decisive Terrain
Posts: 2,151
Liked 1519 Times on 764 Posts
Likes Given: 1164

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkt View Post
Court: Shooting Victim Can Sue Gun Maker, Distributor


The center said Bostic traveled to Ohio, which does not require a license to buy a gun, to procure a large numbers of handguns, including the pistol used to shoot Williams, the ruling said.
So...if the state does not require a license there was no crime selling the guns to Bostic. Who do you sue now?

Quote:
"Although the complaint does not specify the statutes allegedly violated..."
Of course it doesn't because the manufacturer and dealer did not violate any statutes. Once again, the Brady bunch grasping at a feeble straw.
7point62 is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 02:54 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,729
Liked 8222 Times on 4485 Posts
Likes Given: 8005

Default

The "Brady Bunch" hasc long preached that lawsuits should be filed over [B]EVERY[/B shooting. Their reasonig is that even though they will lose these suits, if enough of them are filed, they can bankrupt small dealers with legal fee defending agasint them.
__________________
I didn't fight to defend your freedom so you could vote to take away mine.
locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 03:24 PM   #8
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Ohio and New York both use the FBI for NICS checks. It is true you don't need a permit to purchase a handgun in Ohio.

If this guy was a felon and the gun dealer did not have him fill out a 4473 and run a NICS check and find that out, that's legitimately on the seller - he broke federal law. I don't know what Ohio state law says about selling to out-of-staters. Many states won't permit handgun sales to non-residents.

However, if a 4473 was filled out, a NICS check was run and the go-ahead was given then that's on the FBI and not the dealer.

I can see no reason to sue the gun manufacturer; that's just leftist gun-grabbing crap.
bkt is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 03:42 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Edge of Darkness
Posts: 6,495
Liked 4797 Times on 2683 Posts
Likes Given: 1736

Default

I understand this one? Federal Law prohibites the direct sales of a handgun in every state to nonresidents. A nonresident would have to have an FFL or have the gun transfered via an FFL to his home state. This is a play on words no permit needed in Ohio to buy a firearm? The Brady group is pushing the Ill. "FOID" card idea again. They want laws in every state making guns and ammo buyers carry a state issued ID. Beemiller of course is Hi-Point so they make an easy target for Brady.
nitestalker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 08:20 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: \
Posts: 990
Liked 134 Times on 109 Posts
Likes Given: 43

Default

The suit will get shot down like a crow flying over BBQ/dove hunt. The Brady bunch is wasting their resources on this case. How many times can you sue over the same case? Hi Point has cash to deal with this suit like buying bug spray. Other gun makers will support Hi Point under the table. They don't need any precedent for law suits.
__________________
"I do not aim with my hand; I aim with my eye. He who aims with his hand has forgotten the face of his father.
I do not shoot with my hand; I shoot with my mind. He who shoots with his hand has forgotten the face of his father.
I do not kill with my gun; I kill with my heart. He who kills with his gun has forgotten the face of his father."

Adopt a pet!! http://www.aspca.org/ Some of the finest pleasure horses come from here: http://www.canterusa.org/
Old_Crow is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Got Distributor....now a couple more questions 2111 NFA/Class 3 & FFL Discussion 3 06-22-2012 07:28 PM
Officials: Better to be a victim bkt Legal and Activism 29 03-10-2012 02:59 PM
Mil Spec is now a Glockworx Zev Tech Distributor milspecdepot Sponsor Display 0 09-30-2011 01:29 AM
Ammunition Distributor atsi NFA/Class 3 & FFL Discussion 9 05-18-2011 08:50 PM
Victim of Taurus RealWinner The Club House 93 01-21-2010 07:06 AM



Newest Threads