Vermont The new Holy Land.....
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Vermont The new Holy Land.....

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2011, 06:16 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 34 Times on 29 Posts

Default Vermont The new Holy Land.....

THIS MAY MAKE YOUR DAY!



Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to

the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very
carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping
some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.

Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and

require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would

become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about
unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun.

Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only
the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate
to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the

Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by

the government as well as criminals. Vermont 's constitution states
explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of
themselves and the State" and those persons who are "conscientiously
scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent.."

Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to
arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation
that may arise."

Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required
to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's
license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government
interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they
be asked to do so," Maslack says.


Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the
least restrictive laws of any state ... it's currently the only state
that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit.
This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has
resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation.

"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the
system, but too early to shoot the bastards."

__________________
cpttango30 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 01-17-2011, 06:20 PM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

It'll never happen, but it's a good statement of the Second Amendment's intent.

BTW, "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the
system, but too early to shoot the bastards." is a quote from Claire Wolf's book "The Freedom Outlaw's Handbook".

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 06:26 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dnthmn2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Do you see what happens,Larry?!
Posts: 3,317
Liked 7 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Interesting. I don't think that will ever happen, but its interesting none the less. Almost makes me want to move 20 miles north.

__________________
AMAT VICTORIA CURAM

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
dnthmn2004 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 06:39 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Yunus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: |,Maryland
Posts: 4,873
Liked 1154 Times on 691 Posts
Likes Given: 363

Default

I can just imagine how bad this would backfire when the first idiot who has no clue how to fire a gun decides, I'll just buy a handgun so I don't have to pay the fee, then shoots some innocent kid accidentally because he has no idea how to operate the deadly weapon he just bought.

Also I wonder what this guys stance is on Obamacare. He seems to support forcing citizens to make commercial purchases or be fined. Something that people seem to have taken issue with when it's insurance.

__________________

"Good people drink good beer."
Hunter S. Thompson


Last edited by Yunus; 01-17-2011 at 06:41 PM.
Yunus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 06:52 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dunerunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 8,481
Liked 31 Times on 22 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

Personal responsibility, Yunus. If you drive, you have to learn how and the rules of the road. Same thing applies to weapons, learn the rules and how to use them safely.

Same thing would happen if everyone were required to own a chainsaw!

__________________

People get the government they deserve.

dunerunner is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 07:08 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
buckhuntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sapulpa,Oklahoma
Posts: 2,037
Liked 728 Times on 451 Posts
Likes Given: 1734

Default

Something similar has actually been done before, in Kennesaw, Georgia. Kennesaw gun ordinance
Kennesaw did make allowances for objectors, and no penalty was imposed, but it was still the law for every household to maintain a firearm.

__________________
buckhuntr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 07:24 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,170
Liked 5733 Times on 3359 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Thumbs up

Ya know, some of them yankees ain't all bad.

__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 07:29 PM   #8
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Generally, I'm opposed to requiring people to own firearms. Suddenly, one's right becomes compulsory. That's a form of tyranny.

But if Vermont passes legislation to establish county-wide militia groups and all able-bodied people between 18 and 45 (or whatever the age delimiters are) to participate, then fining people for refusal to participate might make more sense. Of course, opponents would point out that there is no compelling need for a militia when the National Guard and LE exists.

Personally, I would like to see the establishment of county militias across the nation. But I would also like to see a draw-down of the standing military and a pull-out from Iraq and Afghanistan as well as an effort to recall military stationed on bases overseas. (It's a complicated issue, I know. It wouldn't be quick or easy.)

__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 07:51 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TimL2952's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lockport,New York
Posts: 1,329
Liked 188 Times on 131 Posts
Likes Given: 304

Default

I used the National Guard point for my school debate on gun control...Since the National Guard is Government regulated it technically isn't a Militia...a Militia is an organized group of armed civilians led by other armed civilians to protect the welfare of the country.

I think voluntary militia is a great idea...no need to force anyone while we have one of the most advanced and largest armed force on the planet.

__________________
TimL2952 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 08:56 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Yunus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: |,Maryland
Posts: 4,873
Liked 1154 Times on 691 Posts
Likes Given: 363

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dunerunner View Post
Personal responsibility, Yunus. If you drive, you have to learn how and the rules of the road. Same thing applies to weapons, learn the rules and how to use them safely.

Same thing would happen if everyone were required to own a chainsaw!
Which is a great reason not to mandate that people own chainsaws The driving example is fair only if people are forced to pay a special tax if they don't own a car.

I like this man's intention I just think his methods are more for show and on one hand I applaud that, it's also an exercise in futility.
__________________

"Good people drink good beer."
Hunter S. Thompson

Yunus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes