Tyranny in Sussex Virgina Planning Commission!
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Tyranny in Sussex Virgina Planning Commission!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2011, 05:06 AM   #1
Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bigcountry02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 6,363
Liked 1908 Times on 1103 Posts
Likes Given: 3902

Default Tyranny in Sussex Virgina Planning Commission!

Posted on Ammoland today, not reported on the forum. This is for Sussex Virgina folks; but, take note this can happen elsewhere, that has been infested with anti-gunners!

Tyranny in Sussex Virgina Planning Commission

Sussex Virgina Planning Commission doing everything possible to kill current and future shooting ranges.

Covington VA --(Ammoland.com)- I don’t know if there are sufficient words in the English language to express my disdain and disgust with the tyrants and elitists that are on the Sussex Virgina Planning Commission.

What I witnessed tonight makes the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors or the Norfolk City Council look like the Founding Fathers when it comes to understanding freedom and liberty.

About 20 people showed up to speak on the proposed new ordinance drawn up by the Sussex Virgina Planning Commission for shooting ranges in the County. The proposed ordinance makes opening a range in Sussex so onerous and so expensive, that no one would want to do so.

The proposal was released to the public 3 HOURS BEFORE THE MEETING and the Commission complained that no one had come to them with issues about the proposal sooner!!!!! What can you say to that level of foolishness?

Just to give you an idea, here is what the ordinance would require (I could not make this up if I tried):

•Ranges can only be open 6 days a week – all of them must be closed on Sunday. If the range is within 1,000 feet of a school, church, or place of “public assembly,” the County would reserve the right to reduce the hours or days that the range could function however the County sees fit
•No rifles exceeding .45 caliber can be shot, except for black powder rifles. The .45 is, of course, a number they pulled out of their, er, hats (I’m trying to watch my language, but it isn’t easy.)
•Every person shooting on the range is required to read every rule and know all the gun laws - this from a Commission whose members are completely clueless on Virginia’s gun laws
•During the hours the range is open there must be a range safety officer on duty, who, before anyone can shoot, must walk the range perimeter to assure no person is in the fire zone
•No person is allowed to enter or exit the range with a loaded firearm (I told them this was illegal and preempted, but they didn’t seem to care)
•Armor piercing ammunition (such as SS109) cannot be shot (a dirt berm stops SS109 the same as it would stop any other rounds – but like I said the Commission is clueless)
•A person can waive wearing eye or ear protection (!!!!!! HOW STUPID IS THAT? And the Commission claims to be SO concerned about safety. Yeah – sure thing)
•Law Enforcement can go onto the range at any time to determine compliance with the restrictions. So much for the 4th Amendment
•There shall be a person at the range anytime it is in use who has been trained in CPR and basic first aid in case someone gets shot or hurt! I told the Commission that you have a much better chance of being hurt at a soccer game or killed in a car accident than being hurt at a shooting range
•The range must have liability insurance covering $500,000 per incident
•The range owner(s) must pass a background check
•The range must be on at least 25 acres
•There must be “Firing Range” and “Do Not Enter” signs in bright or florescent orange or red and the signs must be a minimum of 18 inches and a maximum of 24 inches apart across the entire range boundary
•The range must be approved by the NRA, but even with NRA approval the County can reject the range’s application (they are trying to put the NRA in the middle of this). No NRA officials were present at the meeting
•Finally, the County would reserve the right to make any other requirements that they want
And all of the above were deemed perfectly reasonable by the County Attorney and the Planning Commission! I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: those of you in rural counties had best start getting involved in local government. Those of you in Sussex and surrounding counties, if this doesn’t wake you up, I’m not sure what will.

They asked me questions when I was through speaking:

One of the Commission members, Chairman Steve White, who claimed to have a CHP, said that a lot of people who carry guns use them to scare and intimidate other citizens. I asked him if that is what he does when HE carries a gun. He dodged that hardball.

Ms. Terry Massenburg liked the requirement to have someone on site all day long who knows CPR and first aid. She asked what responsible person would run a range without such a thing. I asked her if she wanted every hunting blind in their county to also have someone standing nearby who knows CPR. (I probably shouldn’t have given her any more clever ideas.)

One of the local ranges was there with representatives. Their President did a great job, but a few of their members really muddied the waters with comments that seemed almost anti-gun at times. One said, for example, that he agreed with 70% of the proposed regulations, but not 30% of it. WHAT? I hated 100% of it! This wasn’t about safety – the entire thing was meant to completely discourage any and all ranges in the County.

I told the Commission that their proposed regulations made it easier to open a nuclear power plant than to open a shooting range! I said that freedom and liberty did come at some risk, but that Americans wanted their freedom more than they wanted safety supplied by an ever intrusive government.

Do I sound angry? You bet I am.

Those of you in surrounding counties, don’t think this mentality can’t spread where you are, too.

***The Board of Supervisors is going to hear this proposal and vote on it on Thursday, February 17th, at 7 PM.*** We need to turn out big-time and tell them to take this proposal, drop it in the toilet, and send it off to where it deserves to be.

If you are anywhere near Sussex County, please show up and stand with VCDL on this or don’t complain when your ranges dry up and blow away. It’s your choice.

__________________
Bigcountry02 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-09-2011, 09:27 AM   #2
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

That bit about law enforcement being able to go onto private property and check to make sure everything is being complied with tells me what I need to know about the Sussex Planning Commission. They're idiots who don't know the law.

The trouble is, you can find these same idiots all across the country. It doesn't take much effort to get on a town board or planning committee.

I suggest you take some time to write a cogent letter to these people and maybe try to get a lawyer who will give you a few minutes of his or her time pro bono to help illustrate how and why their proposal is outright illegal.

__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2011, 11:56 AM   #3
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Mark F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bedford Texas
Posts: 2,865
Liked 54 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigcountry02 View Post
Posted on Ammoland today, not reported on the forum. This is for Sussex Virgina folks; but, take note this can happen elsewhere, that has been infested with anti-gunners!

Tyranny in Sussex Virgina Planning Commission

Sussex Virgina Planning Commission doing everything possible to kill current and future shooting ranges.

Covington VA --(Ammoland.com)- I don’t know if there are sufficient words in the English language to express my disdain and disgust with the tyrants and elitists that are on the Sussex Virgina Planning Commission.

What I witnessed tonight makes the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors or the Norfolk City Council look like the Founding Fathers when it comes to understanding freedom and liberty.

About 20 people showed up to speak on the proposed new ordinance drawn up by the Sussex Virgina Planning Commission for shooting ranges in the County. The proposed ordinance makes opening a range in Sussex so onerous and so expensive, that no one would want to do so.

The proposal was released to the public 3 HOURS BEFORE THE MEETING and the Commission complained that no one had come to them with issues about the proposal sooner!!!!! What can you say to that level of foolishness?

Just to give you an idea, here is what the ordinance would require (I could not make this up if I tried):

•Ranges can only be open 6 days a week – all of them must be closed on Sunday. If the range is within 1,000 feet of a school, church, or place of “public assembly,” the County would reserve the right to reduce the hours or days that the range could function however the County sees fit
•No rifles exceeding .45 caliber can be shot, except for black powder rifles. The .45 is, of course, a number they pulled out of their, er, hats (I’m trying to watch my language, but it isn’t easy.)
•Every person shooting on the range is required to read every rule and know all the gun laws - this from a Commission whose members are completely clueless on Virginia’s gun laws
•During the hours the range is open there must be a range safety officer on duty, who, before anyone can shoot, must walk the range perimeter to assure no person is in the fire zone
•No person is allowed to enter or exit the range with a loaded firearm (I told them this was illegal and preempted, but they didn’t seem to care)
•Armor piercing ammunition (such as SS109) cannot be shot (a dirt berm stops SS109 the same as it would stop any other rounds – but like I said the Commission is clueless)
•A person can waive wearing eye or ear protection (!!!!!! HOW STUPID IS THAT? And the Commission claims to be SO concerned about safety. Yeah – sure thing)
•Law Enforcement can go onto the range at any time to determine compliance with the restrictions. So much for the 4th Amendment
•There shall be a person at the range anytime it is in use who has been trained in CPR and basic first aid in case someone gets shot or hurt! I told the Commission that you have a much better chance of being hurt at a soccer game or killed in a car accident than being hurt at a shooting range
•The range must have liability insurance covering $500,000 per incident
•The range owner(s) must pass a background check
•The range must be on at least 25 acres
•There must be “Firing Range” and “Do Not Enter” signs in bright or florescent orange or red and the signs must be a minimum of 18 inches and a maximum of 24 inches apart across the entire range boundary
•The range must be approved by the NRA, but even with NRA approval the County can reject the range’s application (they are trying to put the NRA in the middle of this). No NRA officials were present at the meeting
•Finally, the County would reserve the right to make any other requirements that they want
And all of the above were deemed perfectly reasonable by the County Attorney and the Planning Commission! I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: those of you in rural counties had best start getting involved in local government. Those of you in Sussex and surrounding counties, if this doesn’t wake you up, I’m not sure what will.

They asked me questions when I was through speaking:

One of the Commission members, Chairman Steve White, who claimed to have a CHP, said that a lot of people who carry guns use them to scare and intimidate other citizens. I asked him if that is what he does when HE carries a gun. He dodged that hardball.

Ms. Terry Massenburg liked the requirement to have someone on site all day long who knows CPR and first aid. She asked what responsible person would run a range without such a thing. I asked her if she wanted every hunting blind in their county to also have someone standing nearby who knows CPR. (I probably shouldn’t have given her any more clever ideas.)

One of the local ranges was there with representatives. Their President did a great job, but a few of their members really muddied the waters with comments that seemed almost anti-gun at times. One said, for example, that he agreed with 70% of the proposed regulations, but not 30% of it. WHAT? I hated 100% of it! This wasn’t about safety – the entire thing was meant to completely discourage any and all ranges in the County.

I told the Commission that their proposed regulations made it easier to open a nuclear power plant than to open a shooting range! I said that freedom and liberty did come at some risk, but that Americans wanted their freedom more than they wanted safety supplied by an ever intrusive government.

Do I sound angry? You bet I am.

Those of you in surrounding counties, don’t think this mentality can’t spread where you are, too.

***The Board of Supervisors is going to hear this proposal and vote on it on Thursday, February 17th, at 7 PM.*** We need to turn out big-time and tell them to take this proposal, drop it in the toilet, and send it off to where it deserves to be.

If you are anywhere near Sussex County, please show up and stand with VCDL on this or don’t complain when your ranges dry up and blow away. It’s your choice.

This is so far beyond stupid, I can't believe any "thinking" human could seriously consider this trash. On the other hand... we're talking liberals here.
__________________
*** Don't Mess With TEXAS ***
Μολὼν λάβε
Mark F is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2011, 12:28 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dog2000tj's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,309
Liked 3735 Times on 1824 Posts
Likes Given: 13269

Default

Hell this is almost SOP for nearly every last Planning Board/Commission in every town/city up and down the east coast. If you think that is bad go to a Commission meeting in NY, NJ or MA and your head would explode.

Back while studying Architecture at ASU I had to attend a Planning Board meeting in Scottsdale for a class assignment. One of the board members held up approval for a major development of mixed use commercial space because she didn't like the earth tone colors that the owners had submitted. The board member stated flatly that if the developers wanted to get approval for their project that they would have to change the exterior color to pink ... yes, PINK.

Picture in your mind a pink 60-70k square foot 3 story building in a southwest setting. That should sum up to you the level of absurdity in 97.835% of all Planning Boards.

__________________

Member: NRA GOA

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Est sularas oth mithas

"either way, you were guilty by association, so you were smited...." JD

dog2000tj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2011, 04:26 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: richmond,Virginia
Posts: 207
Liked 22 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 15

Default

This is horrible, a few side notes, waiving eye and ear protection is a horrible idea. As far as all firearms being unloaded, my favorite range to visit has that same requirement, I asked why and they said it made their insurance cheaper so their prices are lower. It must be true because they are the cheapest in town as far as range fees, so it could be a good thing.

__________________

we're Americans and we pray for peace, and if we can't have peace we find and destroy the people who screwed up the damn peace. So we can have some peace. - Christopher Titus

collegekid20 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
I was planning on getting an H&K USP .45. Your thoughts on this? Ploofy General Handgun Discussion 17 09-19-2010 08:17 PM
Job Planning Fail Jo da Plumbr The Club House 10 06-26-2010 04:11 AM
The Modern Tyranny Movement crowbar Politics, Religion and Controversy 1 03-31-2009 07:43 PM
Miami-Dade County Commission petitions Congress for assault weapon ban johnsteele Politics, Religion and Controversy 5 02-20-2009 03:58 AM
More proposed federal tyranny, courtesy of Commissar Senator Feinstein opaww Politics, Religion and Controversy 2 05-13-2007 11:02 AM