You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    

Firearm & Gun Forum - > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism >

Total Civilian Disarmament

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-02-2013, 07:26 PM   #1
Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Bigcountry02's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 7,169
Liked 2393 Times on 1417 Posts
Likes Given: 5222

Default Total Arms Disarmament

Interesting article dated from 1961.

This is their intentions.

Too long to post.

Freedom From War

The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World


The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.

In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:

•The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;

•The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;

•The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;

•The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.


The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved. To this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form part of the total program.


The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:

•As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations must be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of disputes;

•Disarmament must proceed as rapidly as possible, until it is completed, in stages containing balanced, phased, and safeguarded measures;

•Each measure and stage should be carried out in an agreed period of time, with transition from one stage to the next to take place as soon as all measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and verified and as soon as necessary arrangements for verification of the next stage have been made;

•Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed forces and armaments in excess of those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process; and

•Disarmament must take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state.


The program provides for progressive disarmament steps to take place in three stages and for the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions.

Last edited by Bigcountry02; 04-02-2013 at 07:32 PM.
Bigcountry02 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here

Old 04-02-2013, 07:53 PM   #2
Welcoming Committee/ Resident Pellet Gunner
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
FullautoUSA's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Marxachusetts
Posts: 2,627
Liked 627 Times on 478 Posts
Likes Given: 1111



image-4203625476.jpg   image-2238851795.jpg  

[COLOR="Blue"]See my pellet guns here:

FullautoUSA is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 09:08 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
1911love's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,488
Liked 646 Times on 390 Posts
Likes Given: 12


Yeah, so everyone disarms except the UN bc they need to keep the peace. Sounds like Obama Bin Laden's dream bill, only LEO/MIL should be armed bc they keep the peace. Gotta love the great ideas that come out of the UN, even in 1961.
1911love is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 09:50 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Free State of Winston, AL
Posts: 4,858
Liked 3527 Times on 2054 Posts
Likes Given: 2308


This is the progressive goal!
It has been for about 100 years now, read it and weep!
The first UN was the League of Nations founded by the great progressive Woodrow Wilson after the Great War!
An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!
JimRau is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 11:19 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 614
Liked 327 Times on 195 Posts
Likes Given: 517


Originally Posted by 1911love View Post
Yeah, so everyone disarms except the UN bc they need to keep the peace. Sounds like Obama Bin Laden's dream bill, only LEO/MIL should be armed bc they keep the peace. Gotta love the great ideas that come out of the UN, even in 1961.
So only those in power will have firearms eh? Sounds logical to me. Why in the world would anyone resist this if it leads to world peace?

(Yeah, sure)
Warrior1256 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 11:45 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
MisterMcCool's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bumfugg, Egypt
Posts: 12,727
Liked 12708 Times on 6627 Posts
Likes Given: 26743


"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry." --Thomas Jefferson

"Among the natural rights of the colonists are these: First a right to life, secondly to liberty, and thirdly to property; together with the right to defend them in the best manner they can." --Samuel Adams

"Arms in the hands of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny, or in private self defense." --John Adams

"Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." --James Madison

"Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with our arms for defense?" --Patrick Henry

I'm not just a happy drunk; I'm also a mean sober. (̿▀̿ ̿Ĺ̯̿̿▀̿ ̿)̄

Last edited by MisterMcCool; 04-02-2013 at 11:48 PM.
MisterMcCool is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
The Myth of Total Disarmament vs. The American Spirit Dillinger Legal and Activism 106 09-08-2012 03:02 AM
Total disarmament can only happen if the people let it happen. opaww Legal and Activism 1 06-06-2010 03:32 PM
The Folly of Unilateral Disarmament Kelly J Politics, Religion and Controversy 11 05-30-2010 05:52 AM
Veterans Disarmament Act on its way to the President Chuck Legal and Activism 20 12-30-2007 04:36 AM
Fighting the Kotowski/Millner Civilian Disarmament Act opaww Legal and Activism 0 05-16-2007 10:01 AM